It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Darkwing01Even though it is readily apparent that this stuff is not reacting with atmospheric oxygen he should really do one in a vacuum or something just to shut our friends the debunkers up once and for all.
Ho ho, Jon, Gotcha!
.
PTFE or other fluoropolymer can be used as a binder for the composition. Its reaction with the aluminium, similar to magnesium/teflon/viton thermite, adds energy to the reaction.
It turns out that Viton makes a nice thermite with aluminum, no iron oxide needed. en.wikipedia.org...
Originally posted by Darkwing01
reply to post by pteridine
Ho ho, Jon, Gotcha!
Hardly, firstly this is not Jones doing the experiment.
Secondly, he says why he is using Viton very clearly at the outset, because that is a formulation of nano-thermite described independently in the scientific literature.
from that wiki page:
.
PTFE or other fluoropolymer can be used as a binder for the composition. Its reaction with the aluminium, similar to magnesium/teflon/viton thermite, adds energy to the reaction.
It is not clear that this is the same formulation as that of the WTC dust particle, in all likelihood by the looks of it it is not. But that is hardly the point now is it?
It is exactly the point. Viton and aluminum are a thermite without iron. No Viton was found in the red chips; no fluorine was shown in the EDAX. Cole does experiments with no bearing on the red chips and then tries to link his experiments with known thermites to the WTC.
Originally posted by Darkwing01
reply to post by pteridine
It is exactly the point. Viton and aluminum are a thermite without iron. No Viton was found in the red chips; no fluorine was shown in the EDAX. Cole does experiments with no bearing on the red chips and then tries to link his experiments with known thermites to the WTC.
It's not Cole, it's Ryan.
He never said this IS the same stuff, he states at the outset that he is testing different formulations. The reddish color clearly comes for the iron oxide and the iron is melted post-reaction. Your source does NOT state that iron does NOT react in a Viton thermite with iron oxide added, it is just something you made up. There is no reason to imagine it would not.
He didn't claim that this is the same formulation, it obviously isn't, but nobody knows what the exact formulation of the WTC stuff was and reverse engineering a compound formulation is not a simple task like you seem to imagine it is.
Originally posted by Darkwing01
reply to post by pteridine
What makes you think a conclusive analysis would be such an easy feat.
You are just making stuff up in you imagination and presenting it as fact. Are you arguing that reverse engineering a chemical formulation is a cake-walk?
Can you outline the steps Jones et al. SHOULD take to easily reverse engineer the stuff you are talking about. We know it isn't Viton thermite, but we also know it is not paint.
So you're the genius, what type of thermite is it then and how was it made?
If you STILL want to claim its paint it should be easy for you to find the specific brand and type so it can be tested.
Come now, this is easy-peasy so I expect you will have no troubles doing either.
Originally posted by pteridine
Jones analyses are flawed.
If we are to believe Jones, there should only be iron oxide, aluminum, silicon, and a carbonaceous binder.
Thermite has not been proved. Jones analyses are flawed.