Which came first - the chicken or the egg

Chicken lays egg.

Egg does not lay chicken.

So - 1. Chicken and 2. Egg.

Therefore, a creator of this world.

LoL seams like the question is quite relevant since there are so many different answer.

The egg came before the chicken. But chicken eggs are from chickens .)

A chicken evolved from a different egg.

What's a "chicken"?

reply to post by Therian


It's improper chicken or the egg, this old story really talks about the universe, what was first, in that content the chicken and the egg is addressed. I would rather use the shell or the content what was first, the content is in the shell, like the chicken in the egg. The primordial soup was first, I'm guessing, like the content of an egg is just that before it becomes a chicken, in a liquid form. If there is anything above the primordial soup then I'm guessing that is that, if not it's the primordial soup.

God made a soup. This question with the egg and the chicken addresses this old story.

With a bit of logic reasoning and knowledge it is easy to answer that question.


The egg came first. A different bird, similar to a chicken but not quite a chicken laid the egg that through a quirk in its DNA became the chicken we know today.


The real question is, how did the first living being come about? What gave an organic compound the energy of life?

Neither. Its the Archaeopteryx!!!

According to fossil records, the present-day chicken is believed to be a descendent of Archaeopteryx

answers.yahoo.com...

Well this answer is quite easy and according to the Bible neither the Chicken or the Egg were 1st, because it was the Rooster or Man who was made 1st. So the rooster, crossed the road, knocked the Hen up and then snuck back home to watch Monday night football with some of his well know jail bird cromies, leaving Her to raise that poor chic alone. So when the Chicken took Him to Court asking for Child support, Her Case was Dismissed, as She had no witness and even the Judge admitted He couldnt understand Hen talking women.

Originally posted by TattooedWarrior
I have just finished reading The origin of species and was wondering about the answer to the question posed in the thread title. I couldn't find a decent answer in Darwins book and I haven't got a danny lerue and was wondering what you guys think.
No egg means no chicken. No chicken means no egg.
WTF?????

ughhh
EGG
something before the chickens evolution would have laid the chicken egg.

First you have the egg from a bird
then a chicken comes out.
then you have the chickenegg

problem solved

The Rooster...

The Rooster ALWAYS comes first!

Eggs were around a long time before chickens. Fish eggs. caviar. yum.

Now for the real question.

Did God create man or did man create god?

reply to post by mongomuggins


My guess is man created god, the next question, where did the first ever egg came from?

Originally posted by TattooedWarrior
I have just finished reading The origin of species and was wondering about the answer to the question posed in the thread title. I couldn't find a decent answer in Darwins book and I haven't got a danny lerue and was wondering what you guys think.
No egg means no chicken. No chicken means no egg.
WTF?????

Here is your answer: When you ask about the chicken and the egg you are refering to the "circle of life." In a "circle" there is no beginning or end.

This question is only for the evolutionist
the chicken was created bearing eggs.
The same goes for every living creature
nature is awsome in that way
life is an intelligent design
only goes to show we are not so intelligent at all.

[
life is an intelligent design

only goes to show we are not so intelligent at all.

Speak for yourself.

reply to post by TattooedWarrior

For you that really want to know ...

Read this

I don't want this to be about being a creationist or evolutionist, but please read this and tell me how this could be wrong...

Many evolutionists believe that either DNA or RNA were the first things to have evolved. This newsletter will show not only why that would be impossible but that DNA actually supports a Creator. DNA (Deoxyribonucleic Acid) is two strands coiled together into a double helix that carry information for any living organism to make all the molecules needed for life. It even stores all the information for cells to divide. RNA (Ribonucleic Acid) is a single strand that puts the genetic information found in the DNA to use by building proteins. These proteins can not arrange themselves without the help of the DNA or RNA. Proteins are like the machines in a wood shop and the RNA/DNA would be the blueprints or instructions to construct the machines. RNA is also very unstable and will only last from about 30 minutes to a few hours, whereas DNA is very stable. This stability is why information is stored in DNA. In short, DNA stores information and then passes it on to RNA, which reads and decodes the information to make proteins. The challenge to any evolutionist is to answer the question of where life came from. With DNA, one must answer the question of where did all the information, stored within itself, come from? In other words, how could the process of natural selection or microevolution gain and pass on information to increase complexity? Today, very few scientists believe DNA could have been the first molecule to evolve because of its extreme complexity

I believe he's right... the chicken was first.

reply to post by mkkkay


What if it was something in between a chicken and an egg, half chicken half egg. That would mean a larva, biological between a form of egg content, what an egg contains, organic matter and a primitive form resembling something. In other words a slimy creature half egg half creature.

It's how an egg looks inside.

You ask which came first: the chicken or the egg
I want to say the egg.

reply to post by TattooedWarrior




Really?

Well the egg came first, since dinosaurs laid them. Then theropod dinosaurs evolved into birds and kept the whole egg laying thing as a standard feature. Chickens evolved from earlier egg laying birds that were not quite chickens. If you went back in time to witness this event you would be unable to tell the exact moment at which the new generation in the egg was a chicken as opposed to what it USED to be since the genetic changes in evolution are gradual.

So the egg came first and it came from something that wasn't quite technically a chicken yet (it's offspring was).

Since DNA can be modified only before birth, a mutation must have taken place at conception or within an egg such that an animal similar to a chicken, but not a chicken, laid the first chicken egg

Chicken or the Egg

reply to post by Titen-Sxull


And what laid the "similar to a chicken but not a chicken" egg?