It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by schuyler
Originally posted by Swills
You missed the whole point of this article (by AOL news) and that is many former DOD/Military folk have come forward and stated there are UFOs and by the looks of it they are not of this earth.
Need more?
Disclosure is: When the government tells what it knows--all of it.
Disclosure is NOT some whistleblower with an unverified story.
Disclosure is NOT some old general claiming UFOs exist.
Disclosure is NOT Corso telling us all how he single-handedly saved Italy.
Disclosure is NOT Jimmy Carter saying he saw one.
Disclosure is NOT Greer telling us he held an alien baby.
So, yeah. I need more. This stuff simply does not cut it--even a little bit.
Originally posted by bvproductions
Just curious... how do we know this is even true? I tried to find the source for this "AOL News" post but came up with no results. Something seems very fishy about the article to me.
Now, this is not saying I am a disbeliever of UFOs...but simply, the source for this post seems to be quite iffy.
Just my two cents!
"At one time, before a lot of this information was released, I could see both the classified and the unclassified material. And I will tell you that 98 percent of the information was already in the public domain. The only things that weren't there was stuff like sources and method, which is protected, but the information about the incident was already out there."....."The problem is, when you discuss UFOs, we are talking everything from little balls of light to hard craft a mile or more across, and everything in between. So what is it?" Alexander asked......... "I argue that, not only are we not solving the problems yet, we're not even asking the right questions, because we approach this wrong................ "I suspect that consciousness is a piece of the puzzle. We talk about UFOs, saying it's a technology that's 1,000 years in advance, but it really isn't. If you follow the history of these things, usually it is somewhat in advance, but not beyond our comprehension by any stretch of the imagination......... "The conundrum you get into is, yes, they are seen by sensors; however, at other times, they are not seen by sensors that should've seen them, and that's one I can't answer."
Originally posted by Ghostinshell
because, what people want is not some random general they have never heard of. but, a press conf of current leaders etc saying ok, here's the deal....
Originally posted by johncarter
reply to post by stirling
Honestly. Noone really cares. The world is swiftly falling towards a global economic chaos. UFOs is the last thing in ordinary ppls mind.
The real crux of the matter is What are we going to do about it?
the ultimate solution to UFOs is more complex than most people think.
Originally posted by anumohi
Its true that some disclosure has occurred, just not the disclosure that everyone dreams about, where they lay it all out in facts with materials.
Col Corso was the only one that shed full light on why the gooberment wasn't and isn't willing to share with the public its findings, because they don't have to, and the longer they can keep it a secret, the more powerful they can become once they have all of the technology worked out and no one will be able to stop them no matter what earthy technology they possess.
but some disclosure has occurred