It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by Xcathdra
You do have a right to question the police. The problem is people dont understand there is a time and place for that. A 3rd party trying to question an officer who is on a traffic stop is not the time nor place. Demanding answers from an officer during the middle of a call or questioning doesnt quite work either.
Then clearly the cop in her instance was by far in the wrong. Thank you finally explaining why you actually agree finally. Obviously during a traffic stop was not the time for him to divert his attention and question the woman. Not the time and place.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
reply to post by SpectreDC
Thank you - and no its not the first time ive been invovled in this topic on this site -
ATS Thread - Police Arrest Woman For Videotaping Them From Her Front Yard: (Wait till you see this tape!)
ATS Thread - Case Dismissed Against Woman Arrested While Videotaping Police
and in both of those threads the underlying argument is false. She never was arrested for recording the Police. She was arrested for failing to oey a lawful command.
Since the charges were dropped by the PA, MS. Good has since filed a civil suit for false arrest and violatin her civil rights - which wont go anywhere.
They also ignore that MS. Good has been down this road prior to this incident, up to and including being arrested for failing to obey lawful commands by other officers while proteting foreclosures.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by Kitilani
Originally posted by Xcathdra
You do have a right to question the police. The problem is people dont understand there is a time and place for that. A 3rd party trying to question an officer who is on a traffic stop is not the time nor place. Demanding answers from an officer during the middle of a call or questioning doesnt quite work either.
Then clearly the cop in her instance was by far in the wrong. Thank you finally explaining why you actually agree finally. Obviously during a traffic stop was not the time for him to divert his attention and question the woman. Not the time and place.
Ah yes, I see you still try to twist to support your argument. The lady had no right to intefere in the traffic stop. Her actions got the attention of the Police, and only escalated it when she decided to lecture the officer on her rights to be in her front yard and to record, which had nothing to do with the officers request, which was to back away.
Because of her refusal to comply wiht alawful command, she was arrested, andher video shows that. Maybe you and the others should watch her video, specifically the part when the officer states why she is under arrest, instead of ignoring it and jsut making up your own reasons why.
She was in the wrong. She had no right to refuse the request.
Originally posted by PhantomLimb
reply to post by Xcathdra
Oh ok, you're an officer so you're obviously going to be an apologist for this shoddy police work. I guess you missed the part where the district attorney said that no crime was committed. Or are you willfully blind to that?
Originally posted by PhantomLimb
reply to post by Xcathdra
Oh ok, you're an officer so you're obviously going to be an apologist for this shoddy police work. I guess you missed the part where the district attorney said that no crime was committed. Or are you willfully blind to that?
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
reply to post by Xcathdra
Was there a time and a place to question the Nazi Secret Police? Don't try and say that they are any different from our police in this era and this country. The only difference is which language they tell us to crouch down and relinquish our rights. Anyone who supports these men and women, is supporting traitors and oath breakers, as they swore to DEFEND the constitution, and instead they spit on it! You sir, have no right to call yourself an American.
Because of her refusal to comply wiht alawful command, she was arrested
Originally posted by TDawgRex
Originally posted by PhantomLimb
reply to post by Xcathdra
Oh ok, you're an officer so you're obviously going to be an apologist for this shoddy police work. I guess you missed the part where the district attorney said that no crime was committed. Or are you willfully blind to that?
Wow! That's quite the assumption that the PA/DA will be at every scene. They don't get involved until AFTER the arrest. Or are you willfully blind to that?
The guy made a bad call and will more than likely be punished somehow. Myself? I think he was polite throughout and made his intention clear if she did not reply.
She was looking for something to sensationalize and she found it.edit on 3-7-2011 by TDawgRex because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by bumpufirst
reply to post by Xcathdra
so what kind of behavior is a protest of foreclosure?and what does it say about her?
are we also omitting the burglary unanswered plus the ticketing?
She was arrested for failing to obey a lawful command.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Originally posted by PhantomLimb
reply to post by Xcathdra
Oh ok, you're an officer so you're obviously going to be an apologist for this shoddy police work. I guess you missed the part where the district attorney said that no crime was committed. Or are you willfully blind to that?
Ah yes, the other argument. Attack the person you dont agree with. At wehat point are you going to drop your blanket hatred against law enforcement? Do you really think that just because you dont understand how the system works that all cops are in the wrong and support each other?
For all we know your Ms. Goods relaive and you are on here schilling for her.
wow... see how easy that was.
Heres an idea.. read the law, see what occured and go from here. Think for yourself instead of being told what to think.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Ah yes, I see you still try to twist to support your argument. The lady had no right to intefere in the traffic stop.
Her actions got the attention of the Police, and only escalated it when she decided to lecture the officer on her rights to be in her front yard and to record, which had nothing to do with the officers request, which was to back away.
Because of her refusal to comply wiht alawful command, she was arrested, andher video shows that. Maybe you and the others should watch her video, specifically the part when the officer states why she is under arrest, instead of ignoring it and jsut making up your own reasons why.
She was in the wrong. She had no right to refuse the request.
Originally posted by Xcathdra
Ah yes, I see you still try to twist to support your argument. The lady had no right to intefere in the traffic stop. Her actions got the attention of the Police, and only escalated it when she decided to lecture the officer on her rights to be in her front yard and to record, which had nothing to do with the officers request, which was to back away.
Because of her refusal to comply wiht alawful command, she was arrested, andher video shows that. Maybe you and the others should watch her video, specifically the part when the officer states why she is under arrest, instead of ignoring it and jsut making up your own reasons why.
She was in the wrong. She had no right to refuse the request.