It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
Originally posted by bogomil
That's your subjective choice, as is your self-contained, self-proving circle-argumentation and your way of presenting it.
Many of us outside this rather small 'bubble' of yours, operate from much bigger and better validated 'bubbles', e.g. science/logic/objectivity, from where we DO ask and test ('bigger' does not include fantasies etc in this context).
But don't fear, very few here (if any) are suggesting to oppress christianity, no matter what 'answers' eventually are found. Non-theists usually only request, that christians take their egalitarian place together with everybody else, independent of faith.edit on 7-6-2011 by bogomil because: addition and precision
I don't care to buy into your psycho-babble, or your "my bubble is bigger than your bubble" mentality. The science you seem to worship has unspoken assumptions you may never articulate in your own lifetime. I note, BTW, that it is science, for all its self-congratulatory aggrandizement, that has led us all to the brink of annihilation. Ironic, yes?
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
Originally posted by bogomil
I'm not a bible-verse citing expert, far from it. But I'm quite at home on the general subject of ideology.
So riddle me this: Who made a 'deal', including all mankind, on the exclusive doctrine of redemption. And on what authority was this 'deal' made.
I never signed that contract, but I'm daily told, that I am part of it. I don't even believe in the basic situation, which is an embellished fairytale to me, around this deal. If I protest publicly, I'm told, that I'm persecuting somebody's 'right' to constantly trying to convert me.edit on 8-6-2011 by bogomil because: additional clarification
On His own authority, God created the Plan of Salvation. By this means, He purposed to save/redeem/reconcile the the entire Creation (note carefully here: not just "lost sinners") back into a right relationship with Himself. As the One who created it all, He was the One to do it. You were not required to sign any contract, but even so, you are a party to it as a created being. Your lack of commitment, your lack of belief, your protest have no bearing on this. I don't even care if you convert or not, the Plan of Salvation will overtake you, and there is nothing you can do about it. It's really quite funny.
Originally posted by bogomil
So in other words, ....I am, with or without my consent, forced into this scheme of religious fascism, because you and your holy manual say so.
I'm quite sure this attitude of yours will be attractive to contemporary mankind.
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
Originally posted by bogomil
So in other words, ....I am, with or without my consent, forced into this scheme of religious fascism, because you and your holy manual say so.
I'm quite sure this attitude of yours will be attractive to contemporary mankind.
Fascism is a specific political ideology, so why do you apply it here? It's a sloppy use of terms. My attitude in this matter is irrelevant, as is its attractiveness. You are correct, however, in assessing your situation. You are an un-indicted co-defendant. You can not escape your fate, bad in the short term, good in the long term. You should know that I am a Universal Reconciliationist.edit on 8-6-2011 by Lazarus Short because: lah-de-dah
In what way is it the opposite of a null hypothesis?
Well, if it's the deity of the Christian Bible, that deity says that all things are possible through faith.
Which rules would those be?
Your understanding of basic critical thinking is a no-go if you think there isn't a null hypothesis.
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
You neglected to mention that God was not privy to that "deal." It was all in the mind of Jephthah, who did admit that he had made his oath foolishly.
Judges 11v29-31
Then the Spirit of the LORD came on Jephthah. He crossed Gilead and Manasseh, passed through Mizpah of Gilead, and from there he advanced against the Ammonites.And Jephthah made a vow to the LORD: “If you give the Ammonites into my hands,whatever comes out of the door of my house to meet me when I return in triumph from the Ammonites will be the LORD’s, and I will sacrifice it as a burnt offering.”
Originally posted by Leahn
That's not what I said. I said that his null hypothesis isn't a valid null hypothesis. It is an affirmative premise, that is, it makes a statement about God's existence, that is, that He doesn't exist. When making said statement, the OP incurred in burden of proof for his statement, which he has not met.
Matthew 7:7,8,11
Ask, and it will be given to you; seek, and you will find; knock, and it will be opened to you. For everyone who asks receives, and he who seeks finds, and to him who knocks it will be opened...If you then, being evil, know how to give good gifts to your children, how much more will your Father who is in heaven give good things to those who ask Him!.
Originally posted by Leahn
And where in your tests do you account for the fact that God also has free will and may choose to not to cooperate, specially given your affirmation that "no way your tests would miss him" ?
Leviticus 27:28-29
But nothing that a person owns and devotes to the LORD—whether a human being or an animal or family land—may be sold or redeemed; everything so devoted is most holy to the LORD. No person devoted to destruction may be ransomed; they are to be put to death.
Hebrews 2v17, 9v11,24
For this reason he had to be made like them, fully human in every way, in order that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in service to God, and that he might make atonement for the sins of the people...he went through the greater and more perfect tabernacle that is not made with human hands, that is to say, is not a part of this creation..It was necessary, then, for the copies of the heavenly things to be purified with these sacrifices, but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these.
Originally posted by LiveEquation
Originally posted by Leahn
That's not what I said. I said that his null hypothesis isn't a valid null hypothesis. It is an affirmative premise, that is, it makes a statement about God's existence, that is, that He doesn't exist. When making said statement, the OP incurred in burden of proof for his statement, which he has not met.
If God was absolute truth he would pass any test thrown at him since absolute truth is a singularity. If God is a singularity then it also means he is infinite, then there would be no way my tests would miss him since properties of his existence are everywehere.edit on 8-6-2011 by LiveEquation because: (no reason given)edit on 8-6-2011 by LiveEquation because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LiveEquation
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
You neglected to mention that God was not privy to that "deal." It was all in the mind of Jephthah, who did admit that he had made his oath foolishly.
That actually is not true...According to your bible Jephthah was under the influence of the Holy Spirit when he made that vow
Judges 11v29-31
Then the Spirit of the LORD came on Jephthah. He crossed Gilead and Manasseh, passed through Mizpah of Gilead, and from there he advanced against the Ammonites.And Jephthah made a vow to the LORD: “If you give the Ammonites into my hands,whatever comes out of the door of my house to meet me when I return in triumph from the Ammonites will be the LORD’s, and I will sacrifice it as a burnt offering.”
I don't know why people always neglect that it all started with the Spirit of the LORD coming on Jephthah.
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
I suspect that God just does not care a fig about your silly tests.