It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by subject x
reply to post by ImmortalIntegrity
Why do you keep bringing up HAARP in a chemtrail debunker thread?
There are plenty of HAARP threads around, why not add your opinion to some of them?
This one has heaps of good information in it.
Originally posted by ImmortalIntegrity
I would like to propose that chemtrail debunkers are nothing more than government shills, shilling themselves to the point of ridicule.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
But why then would you place any more credence on, say, Carnicom, Rense, or any of the various vociferous chemtrail proponents, and leap to the conclusion that chemtrails DO exist?? Because they publish videos? Because they have their own websites?
there are plenty of "debunking" sites too - usually much better organsied and presenting much more and better supported evidence.
There is heaps of science explaining everythign that contrails do.
Originally posted by Drustew
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
But why then would you place any more credence on, say, Carnicom, Rense, or any of the various vociferous chemtrail proponents, and leap to the conclusion that chemtrails DO exist?? Because they publish videos? Because they have their own websites?
there are plenty of "debunking" sites too - usually much better organsied and presenting much more and better supported evidence.
There is heaps of science explaining everythign that contrails do.
From what ive seen from this thread i think your looking for comments like the one above. As this person has said there is debunking website that as he has acknowledged are better organised and presenting much better with more evidence on debunking
Thats what the question is here u see and i hope this is what you were meaning for this thread to prove. Why?....... Why have they got better websites which are more organised and presented, why such the effort to debunk and border line ridicule the theory of "Chemtrails" and the people that believe. Interesting thread with interesting reactions to the OP.
I made a thread about chemtrails just today and about a "Black line" that the plane was following, here's the link for anyone thats interested www.abovetopsecret.com...
Seems this is possibly caused by shadows from some sort of clouds that on my day of viewing couldnt be seen, that to me sounds more of a conspiracy than spraying chemicals but hayhoo not hijacking this thread. Interesting stuff IMO.
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by network dude
I have already made a few contacts on face book and I created a new "chemtrail info sharing" community group there. I will get the word out to as many people as I can once we have a more solid plan in place.
Edit: I can contact about 5000 chemtrail people today to discuss this proposal.edit on 22-3-2011 by MathiasAndrew because: edit text
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by network dude
Batter up.....I will accept your challenge dude. I say that the science by which the "persistent contrailers" stand by is inaccurate, incomplete, inconsistent and under studied. Where would you like to begin?
Originally posted by Essan
Originally posted by MathiasAndrew
reply to post by network dude
Batter up.....I will accept your challenge dude. I say that the science by which the "persistent contrailers" stand by is inaccurate, incomplete, inconsistent and under studied. Where would you like to begin?
I've started a new thread just for this purpose - to show that the persistent contrail theory is wrong
www.abovetopsecret.com...