It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Before succumbing to her legendary death-by-snake in 30 B.C., Cleopatra VII, last queen of Egypt, gave birth to twins.
Alexander Helios and Cleopatra Selene II were born in 40 B.C., two of the eight children sired by Roman general Mark Antony during his lifetime.
As it happens, the asteroid 216 Kleopatra also had twins: Two small moons were recently found orbiting the space rock.
Kleopatra the asteroid was discovered in 1880, waaaay out in the so-called main belt, between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter. (See an interactive solar system.)
Using Earth-based telescopes in Chile and Puerto Rico, scientists discovered in 2000 that Kleopatra has two lobes connected by a long midsection, reminiscent of a dog's bone—albeit one that's 135 miles (217 kilometers) long.
Kleopatra 216
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/2e0f1dfa1dab.jpeg[/atsimg]
The radar images that revealed her curves also told scientists that Kleopatra is most likely made of metal, with a loose, gravelly surface texture. But the asteroid's interior structure remained a mystery.
In 2008 higher resolution pictures taken with a telescope in Hawaii confirmed the dog-bone shape and uncovered the two orbiting offspring, each about five miles (eight kilometers) wide.
Originally posted by randyvs[/I]
Doesn't appear that mass has much to do with gravity after all.edit on 25-2-2011 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by nataylor
There are 6 known small bodies that have at least 2 moons. It's estimated as many as 2% of all asteroids have moons.
Originally posted by randyvs
Seriously is there a difference between minor planets and asteroids? This seems to widen the scope as far as gravity is concerned. Dosn't appear that mass has much to do with gravity after all.
Originally posted by poet1b
why would an asteroid orbiting another asteroid be classified as a moon. Considering our moon is as large as Mercury,
Originally posted by Ophiuchus 13
Originally posted by poet1b
why would an asteroid orbiting another asteroid be classified as a moon. Considering our moon is as large as Mercury,
I see your point exactly. I think a moonoid does fit better with description Or maybe just large or small celestial bodies with orbiting or rotating celestial bodies.
Thanksedit on 2/25/11 by Ophiuchus 13 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by poet1b
reply to post by CLPrime
Nice math skills. Looks like you do this regularly. Where do you get the value for an Iron basis for density?
Do you have any idea what gravity force would exist on the surface of Cleopatra?
I have to speculate, considering the shape of Cleopatra, if we aren't looking at a giant magnate. I wonder if this has been looked into by NASA.