It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Oh just great, we fight a couple world wars
only to be invaded successfully
by Canadians.
Obama just spit on every single grave at Arlington.
Originally posted by Fox Molder
Why am I the only one that does not see a problem with this agreement ? It is obvious that any troops serving on foreign soil and under the command of the residing military force would be bound by that nation's laws. The only place a U.S. soldier or citizen for that mater is on he's own soil while in another country is at the Embassy.
Plus..The only time such utilization be done would be under martial law meaning a hell of a lot of civil unrest!
It is no different than the understanding in place now that allows a Canadian police officer to continue a chase on to American soil....Once crossed over the boarder the Canadian officer is to take an accompanying role in the chase, same goes for the contrary when a U.S. trooper crosses in to Canada!
Originally posted by 420man
It' all about sovereignty. I believe that Canada and the US should worry about thier own populace.Troops should only be protecting trier own embassies otherwise,yes, the potential for abuse of power is gonna be there. A "he said she said" scenario.
Oh just great, we fight a couple world wars only to be invaded successfully by Canadians.
Originally posted by boondock-saint
Oh just great, we fight a couple world wars
only to be invaded successfully
by Canadians.
Wonder what Gen. Patton would think about that???
Or Eisenhower ???
Obama just spit on every single grave at Arlington.