It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hot_Wings
reply to post by hawaii50th
It was not my intention to destroy your hope. There is definitely hope for relative peace and tranquility, as we have seen in America for many years now. But this relative peace and tranquility comes not from the flawed logic of “Let’s all get along”. Our relative peace and tranquility comes through unity and strength. It is that we understand and accept fundamentally the truths that I previously described and do something about it.
Our way of life was granted to us by three things, freedom, Christian morality and laws, and military strength. These are where we have come from and where we must remain in order to avoid conflict and enjoy a relative peace. It is not that we ignore the truths of life, it is that we remain united against our aggressors and not lose focus upon these truths of life. This is why I have repeated them here, because many are choosing to state that they do not exist and are splitting into the factions of disunity that will enable our unified enemies to destroy us
.
It is not that you stand upon the side and say, “Just don’t bother me.” That is the fool’s way that always leads to utter doom. It is that you stand for what you believe and unite with others of your beliefs and not lose sight of responsibilities of our nation and its freedoms and relative tranquility. You must stand up for what is right.
If you smoke, stop. Do not justify your wrongs and claim to be good parents and stewards of home and country by being excusive and belligerent. If you are Christian than stand for Christianity and do not say it is not my problem to confront other ideologies and those who want to promote them. Your belief that nothing matters so long as it does not affect you is precisely the philosophy that will enable everyone else to seize control of the position of policy that you have vacated and the results of which will affect you down the hundredth generation.edit on 23-2-2011 by Hot_Wings because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TheAmused
I would have thought ATS a conspiracy site would not have them considering there afraid to fart for fear the government will eat them alive.
Yet they come to ATS acting like a concerned citizen..
Saying..NO..Spewing hatred and Discontent toward HUMAN BEING'S..
LIKE...
smoker's should be tried for unfit parent's.
fat people should loose the right to healthcare
drunk's are not people but a shell and not worth pity.
All of the thread's you know well if not just do a search.
My point is all this controlling is not from the mind of a conspiracy theorist's mind.
Conspiracy theorist's do not want the government to take away your right's now do they?
Heck NO they don't...they fear it more than anything...
Yet A new group of people are trying to get fuel to there agenda..DO NOT fall for it folk's be smarter.
Even if smoking is nasty to you..it is there right to smoke.
just like if fat people make you sick ...it's there right to eat all they want as they can afford.
and same goes for the drunk.
and so on and so on.
These SO CALLED member's on ATS are baiting you for there agenda.
Do you guy's not understand...
You take away a smoker's right's claim there unfit parent's...
Next you opened a doorway for far more implication's...and the government will use the chance.
Remember folk's stop trying to control anyone.
The Shyt is not right period!
Originally posted by daryllyn
If people would mind their own damn business, everyone would be better for it.
S&F
Originally posted by PlanterZ
Originally posted by TheAmused
smoker's should be tried for unfit parent's.
fat people should loose the right to healthcare
drunk's are not people but a shell and not worth pity.
I'm sorry, I know this if off topic, but allow me to rant. Since when is everyone using apostrophes to make things plural? That really doesn't belong there. Smoker - Smokers, not "Smoker is", which is what smoker's is.
I don't understand how so much of the internet can follow this trend so quickly. Guys, to make a noun plural, just add an s. No need for an apostrophe.
BTW, I agree with you. S&Fedit on 21-2-2011 by PlanterZ because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by fooks
are u frikkin #tin me? 2 wrongs don't make a right?
walking along a road with mucho cars is better?
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
I'm not a pro smoker, i don't smoke, have never smoked and i don't think people should.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
No but it is merely one example, i can give you a number of others which eventually lead to harm to other people. Consider obesity, the amount of money spent on people who are obese cuts money from other essential health services and impacts everyone in society. Does this mean we should tax fat people?
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
I would argue cigarrettes have a practical benefit. Firstly they raise taxes which can be spent in other areas, smokers will often pay double the healthcare costs they use. Secondly it does appear smokers are people who need something to relax them, they are basically self medicating, just like alcoholics.
And generally they do keep it to themselves, you are correct it is about self gratification but it's also self medication. Some people meditate (like me) others smoke.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
That is generally how it goes in the UK as well. Occasionally you walk past someone in the street but it's maybe twice a day for me, i somehow doubt it's impacting my health.
Originally posted by ImaginaryReality1984
I knew we could agree on something somewhere
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Perhaps I should have phrased that as: ''this regular line of argument from those who support someone's right to smoke in public.''
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
The link you make between obesity and the impact on other health services is not a direct cause/effect link, and is also open to debate and interpretation.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Obese people, like smokers, tend to have higher incidences of early death, thereby also saving money on the health services that would be provided to them if they had lived a healthier lifestyle.
Whether this cancels out the amount that's spent on people who are obese, I don't know.
I think that fat people should be indirectly taxed by the introduction of tax on unhealthy and fattening foods.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Yes, but all of the above stands whether they are allowed to smoke in public or not.
Taxes will still be raised by people buying them, and people can still use them as stress-relief or as some kind of a relaxant, even if they are not permitted to smoke in public.
Originally posted by Sherlock Holmes
Really ? Twice a day ? Do you live in a big city ?
When I'm in my city centre, there are dozens of people smoking over a short space of time, walking down the street or outside the entrance to buildings.. While I'm aware that I'm not going to inhale everybody's smoke, it is perfectly common for me get 4-5 daily ''up close and personal'' intakes of someone else's smoke.
If someone is being beaten, robbed, abused, raped, mugged, neglected, held against their will, etc... Then yes, you should speak up. What's sad is that many times the above mentioned things are ignored, and things that really don't matter are things that people want to get involved in.
Originally posted by angelwrangler
daryllyn said:
If someone is being beaten, robbed, abused, raped, mugged, neglected, held against their will, etc... Then yes, you should speak up. What's sad is that many times the above mentioned things are ignored, and things that really don't matter are things that people want to get involved in.
This has been my supposition as well daryllyn, ...while we are focusing on shiny bobbles or the ridiculous bogey men, they are walking out the back door with our houses, our children's future's and our dreams.
I read google news everyday.
They found the person who dismembered the crippled ten year old, and the parent who killed his three sons, but, we are no closer to finding the boy in Washington who disappeared off of school grounds and the parents of the four year old who beat her to death who are in holding jail since the neighbors did not know that they had a child. The woman who seat belted her children into their child "safety" seats and then neutraled them into a river where they drowned, is in jail, eating three meals and sleeping well on our bill...and what are we talking about...
.....second hand smoke, legal drugs and fast food.