It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MarrsAttax
However, once we start hypothesising that the phenomena may be the result of an intelligence at least on par with our own then you must make allowance for the fact that any 'evidence' you find may have been manipulated by the very phenomenon you are trying to study.
Originally posted by MarrsAttax
How do you prove the existence of something that doesn't want it's existence proved and is much smarter than you?
Originally posted by EsSeeEye
Since I joined these forums (and over the time before when I simply lurked them) there has been a very obvious and exceptional stance taken toward the skeptical point of view of the ET Hypothesis. Namely that we, as skeptics, are an adversary to thwart in the grand scheme of bringing the reality of extraterrestrial visitation to light for the rest of the world. It’s become something of a war
Originally posted by grizzle2
Is it any wonder, when skeptics have acted like they do, calling an abductee (yelling at him, actually) "You are a God-damn liar!!" on Larry King's show
Originally posted by grizzle2
What does an "extraordinary" claim mean?
Originally posted by grizzle2 And why does it require extraordinary evidence
Originally posted by grizzle2 it walks, acts and quacks like a duck, scientists tell us it's a cow. Or a cow dressed up like a duck.
Originally posted by WingedBull
Sagan's Dragon in the Garage parable eloquently explains this much better than I could hope to.
Originally posted by EsSeeEye
reply to post by Flux8
You're absolutely right. The only reason I used the term "skeptic" at all in this post was because it is the most immediately identifiable definition of myself that I was able to come up with, so I didn't need to explain everything.
There's a very wide gamut that runs between pure eyes-closed-forever ignorant unhealthy "skepticism" and mind open for anything regardless belief. I'd bet that a good 98% of us are somewhere smack dab in the middle, and only differ in slight degrees on either side.
Like I mentioned in the post, though: If I were to garner sufficient evidence, I would change my stance immediately. Being abducted by aliens could very likely change my viewpoint.
Originally posted by tsawyer2
There are some hard core debunkers and they can be rude...
Originally posted by EsSeeEye
But how will we ever get that kind of evidence when the Government/Military/Illuminati/insert-your-favorite-flavor-of-cover-up-conspiracy-here is hoarding all the real evidence?
I don’t believe there is a mass cover-up of evidence (for the same reason I don’t yet accept that there are aliens visiting the Earth, lack of real evidence and an overabundance of fabricated stories). However, if I were wrong and there were a mass cover-up by people who are so powerful that they could silence the literally thousands upon thousands of people that would have to be knowledgeable of the truth, then what could we do? We’d be at their whim.
Originally posted by yeti101
reply to post by TheFlash
your stanton friedman video isnt working. Disclosure project was a bunch of people telling stories. That other link about a judge not releasing information becuase of national security- so what? nowhere does he say its anything related to ET in spaceships or that the gvt said it was related to ET in spaceships.
Originally posted by Kali74
"Believers" have made this bed too. Before we start talking about abductions ad contactees (not saying this doesnt happen), we have to establish proof that ET is here. If we can't establish that then those accounts only make the mainstream push it further away.
Originally posted by TheFlash
Originally posted by EsSeeEye
But how will we ever get that kind of evidence when the Government/Military/Illuminati/insert-your-favorite-flavor-of-cover-up-conspiracy-here is hoarding all the real evidence?
I don’t believe there is a mass cover-up of evidence (for the same reason I don’t yet accept that there are aliens visiting the Earth, lack of real evidence and an overabundance of fabricated stories). However, if I were wrong and there were a mass cover-up by people who are so powerful that they could silence the literally thousands upon thousands of people that would have to be knowledgeable of the truth, then what could we do? We’d be at their whim.
This would seem to indicate that you are not aware of information such as:
- The Disclosure Project
- The Information in this ATS thread
- This information
This causes me to wonder how much how much personal time and research your opinion on the topic is based on. The fact is that many of the involved people HAVE come forward and spoken on the record. Research will also reveal other historical instances of projects and events which were considered government secrets at the time and kept by large numbers of people.
Originally posted by Pimander
The other thing that I would like to point out is that there has been an incredible amount of testimony that there are aliens visiting Earth, including testimony that people have met them and seen them in association with flying craft. Testimony that people have seen bodies. Testimony that 'saucers have been captured. Lots of related material too.
Yes, testimony is never going to amount to scientific proof. You are correct to say that. But it is stretching the imagination to say that every bit of that testimony is either hallucination, fabrication etc. If only one of those testimonies are true, then there has to be some scientific explanation for it.
My bone of contention with some (not all) so called sceptics is this: If you are so interested in this topic then why not look for that scientific explanation yourself instead of just hanging around debunking? In other words do a bit of original research.
Of course when some interesting data is produced it should be scrutinised by those of us who are truly sceptical of new ideas. But there is something going on and it demands an explanation. The answer might be complicated (it isn't all aliens that's for sure) or it may be simple (there are, perhaps, aliens in all this muddy water somewhere). But surely more of your sceptical enquiry should be directed to finding new evidence and not just debunking.
I hope I am not going to get slammed for that, but I think I have a point. Anyone agree?
Originally posted by tsawyer2
For me, when I see a post about this topic, I am hoping to see something extraordinary, but first I have to ask myself. Is there a rational explanation for this? If I see a shaky video of a blinking light, I'm going to call it just that. Especially when it turns out that the video was taken at night in the landing path at Newark International airport.
I have seen some videos out there that I certainly can't explain. But then again, just because I can't explain them doesn't mean I have to jump immediately to the conclusion that it's extraterrestrials.
Originally posted by Pimander
reply to post by EsSeeEye
Good post. S&F.
Originally posted by EsSeeEyeWords.
This is the only part where I differ from you in any major way. We know there has been a cover up of some description. However, that doesn't mean that it has all been a cover up about aliens. Some of it may be but there is so much garbage out there it is a nightmare to separate all the different strands of evidence.
Originally posted by Pimander
The other thing that I would like to point out is that there has been an incredible amount of testimony that there are aliens visiting Earth, including testimony that people have met them and seen them in association with flying craft. Testimony that people have seen bodies. Testimony that 'saucers have been captured. Lots of related material too.
Yes, testimony is never going to amount to scientific proof. You are correct to say that. But it is stretching the imagination to say that every bit of that testimony is either hallucination, fabrication etc. If only one of those testimonies are true, then there has to be some scientific explanation for it.
Originally posted by Pimander
My bone of contention with some (not all) so called sceptics is this: If you are so interested in this topic then why not look for that scientific explanation yourself instead of just hanging around debunking? In other words do a bit of original research.
Of course when some interesting data is produced it should be scrutinised by those of us who are truly sceptical of new ideas. But there is something going on and it demands an explanation. The answer might be complicated (it isn't all aliens that's for sure) or it may be simple (there are, perhaps, aliens in all this muddy water somewhere). But surely more of your sceptical enquiry should be directed to finding new evidence and not just debunking.