It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by pteridine
reply to post by manmental
B-25 WW2 light bomber in 1945 not a B-52 heavy bomber. The Empire State building was of a completely different construction than WTC 1 and 2.
Originally posted by warequalsmurder
Yeah, I believed the official story that my parents told me about Santa Claus. But then I grew up and found out that their OS was a fairytale. Much like this poppycock you're trying to pass off as closure and confirmation.
Originally posted by gandalph
Dude, that is not a steel column building. It's a prefab, concrete building that's only several stories high, not a skyscraper/highrise with a steel structure.
Try comparing the demolition of a mud brick house next...
Originally posted by manmental
but seeing this video and seeing that this kind of damage is possible from a top floor collapse has made me think that extra explosives needn't have been involved.
Originally posted by manmental
It looks like 'FREE FALL' to me... at least as exact as one can say from videos. Exactly like WTC.
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
reply to post by manmental
NIce find, but that is not the same at all. The whole building didn't even fall down. They even weakened the side that did fall. That building was not built up to code like the WTC was. The WTC was built to withstand the collision of an airliner. The building in your video did not have the same steel beam reinforcement as the WTC. I can go on for ever but I will stop now.
I hate to be a jerk, but that video doesn't prove anything at all.
Originally posted by manmental
reply to post by reeferman
But as you mention it. I think building 7 might well have been a controlled demolition... as in I heard a lot of New York buildings have to be built with controlled demolition explosives in place in case they need to 'pull' the buildings. I haven't got a source to this apart from stuff I've read on ATS etc.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by manmental
but seeing this video and seeing that this kind of damage is possible from a top floor collapse has made me think that extra explosives needn't have been involved.
Well don't think about it too hard. The video you posted was of a concrete structure being felled. Not even in the same ball park as comparable to any steel-structured highrise, let alone the WTC towers.