It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
psychiatry provides a way to eliminate or silence dissenters and other able people
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
reply to post by l_e_cox
psychiatry provides a way to eliminate or silence dissenters and other able people
How so? No one can be "forced" to go to a psychiatrist for dissenting. In fact, the only situations that result in mandatory psychiatric evaluation are those in which the person has harmed others. I see no problem with this.
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
reply to post by Rockerchic4God
Actually, most of the problems you mention (memory loss, etc.) were solved when practices switched from bilateral to unilateral ETC. That's not to say there aren't other issues related to the therapy, but the ones you've cited are outdated.
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
reply to post by l_e_cox
psychiatry provides a way to eliminate or silence dissenters and other able people
How so? No one can be "forced" to go to a psychiatrist for dissenting. In fact, the only situations that result in mandatory psychiatric evaluation are those in which the person has harmed others. I see no problem with this.
wow you are really living in a bubble, aren't you? have corrupt police or spooks visit you at 4 am and take you for a ride and return you home before six am completely brain fried/wiped and say that again-- if you can.
can't be forced tell that to all those african-americans who got diagnosed and locked up as dangerous schizophrenics back in the sixties for being in the civil rights movement all it took was a rewrite of that "big book of mental illnesses" that the psych's use nowadays there is supposedly a mental illness called confrontational something or other got diagnosed with it once. a bit of NLP and some judicious use of hypnosis made that so called doctor forget to
record it, so as far as TPTB/authorities know i'm completely sane with no records of M.I.
it used to be my understanding that this was banned in "civilized countries" guess not
a friend of mine whose only problem was an extreme case of being self-conscious/easily embarrassed
had this done to him, he was kinda kooky,but functional 4th in our class;
now it's as if he's possessed by Legion ["we are many"]
and is now permanently institutionalized.
definitively a form of lobotomy
S&Fedit on 29-1-2011 by DerepentLEstranger because: added edit & additional commentedit on 29-1-2011 by DerepentLEstranger because: spellcheck
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
How so? No one can be "forced" to go to a psychiatrist for dissenting. In fact, the only situations that result in mandatory psychiatric evaluation are those in which the person has harmed others. I see no problem with this.
The criteria for writing requires probable cause. This includes danger to self, danger to others together with some indication, prior to the administering of the hold, of symptoms of a mental disorder, and/or grave disability—as noted below. The conditions must exist under the context of a mental illness.
1) Danger to self: The person must be an immediate threat to themselves, usually by being suicidal. Someone who is severely depressed and wishes to die would fall under this category (though they generally have to have expressed a plan to commit suicide and not just a wish to die).
2) Danger to others: The person must be an immediate threat to someone else's safety.
3) Gravely disabled: ..............
en.wikipedia.org...
Jonathan M. Metzl, MD, PhD, is a psychiatrist who also has a Ph.D. in American Studies. He is Associate Professor of Psychiatry and Women's Studies and Director of Program in Culture, Health, and Medicine at the University of Michigan. In this capacity he works as a Senior Attending Physician in the adult psychiatric clinics and teaches courses in the areas of history of psychiatry, gender, and health at the undergraduate and graduate levels. He is the author of "Prozac on the Couch: Prescribing Gender in the Era of Wonder Drugs" (Duke University Press, 2003), and of "The Protest Psychosis: How Schizophrenia Became a Black Disease" (Beacon Press, 2010).
Originally posted by VneZonyDostupa
A spouse/next-of-kin can easily sign you out, assuming you haven't shown signs of suicidal ideation, self-harm, or have harmed others.
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
what part of the above don't you understand?
or did you just not bother to follow the link as is SOP for you?
T&C forbids you to advertise your business here. awww, to bad.
i prefer to "Deny Ignorance" by ignoring people who have their heads up their anus, they never listen any way.