It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Conventional entanglement links particles across space. Now physicists say a similar effect links particles through time.
The answer is that Olson and Ralph's teleportation provides a shortcut into the future. What they're saying is that it's possible to travel into the future without being present during the time in between.
To see how, imagine an experiment that Ralph and Olson describe in which a qubit is sent into the future. The idea is that a detector acts on a qubit and then generates a classical message describing how this particle can be detected. Then, at some point in the future, another detector at the same position in space, receives this message and carries out the required measurement, thereby reconstructing the qubit.
As far as I can see this seems to work from the past to the future, not much good for sending a yes or no signal back in time. Imagine the possibilities if that was the case.
I can't even imagine the implications if this is one day put into conventional use.
What? That makes no sense. If you recieve the answer in the present, then you have no choice but to go back in time in the future to deliver that answer. There's no way getting around it. It's not a movie.
Originally posted by WhizPhiz
reply to post by ppk55
As far as I can see this seems to work from the past to the future, not much good for sending a yes or no signal back in time. Imagine the possibilities if that was the case.
I can't even imagine the implications if this is one day put into conventional use.
Well, it would create a type of paradox if we could receive answers from the future. How can we discover something in the future, and receive the answer in the present? That means we've just discovered the answer in the present, so our future selves don't have to find the answer and then send it back to us. It's not logical. However, sending a message forward in time might be plausible. Since we are sending our future selves something they should already know. In fact they would probably have a record of that transmission taking place. If the message was sent from your present self to your future self, the future self would have a memory of sending it. I can't really see much use for this TBH.
Originally posted by Phractal Phil
The whole primise of sending your past self a messge from the future has been proven to be paradoxical. Any claim that it can be done is a lie.
However, sending a message forward in time might be plausible.