The GAY BOMB!

Originally posted by halfoldman

Did they plan the enemy to be temporarily stunned with a situational homosexual orgy?

They were hoping.. buncha pervs.

reply to post by Terms777


I do think its possible, and i think its to do with energies.

I am sure they have researched this alot in prisons, and it probably works, i would guess.

To even think of something like this you have to have repressed homosexual tendencies.

Funny yes! Me homo? No! My libido tells me not to be gay. No offence!

Originally posted by Terms777

Originally posted by Randall07
Man the news in this world never ceases to amaze me. "The sunshine project" that's hilarious! So if they can make straight people gay, does that mean they can also make a de-gaying bomb as well?

If you wish them to drop the degay bomb, type...YAY, and the reason why you think the degay bomb should be dropped!

edit on 20-1-2011 by Terms777 because: (no reason given)

I'm sure some corporation would come up with an antidote called, Ben Gay.

Hey you guys, if a big giant gay bomb exploded in a major city, would then "It (be) Raining Men"? "Halleluyia!"

reply to post by Terms777


I have had no real conversations with God, but from what I have read He is the judge and wishes that I love my brother. My brother ( or sister) might have the gay. I can disagree with it, but I can still love the person and allow God to do his job in judgment.

Next time youre talking to him will you PLEASE ask him where my keys are? I had to pay big bucks for a duplicate car key last week and Im pissed off at now having to get others remade and replaced.

Originally posted by Terms777

To even think of something like this you have to have repressed homosexual tendencies.

Funny yes! Me homo? No! My libido tells me not to be gay. No offence!

edit on 20-1-2011 by Terms777 because: (no reason given)

What does man have to have sex, just an erection. Its possible to make any man homo, and i reckon they know it already.

Originally posted by andy1033

Originally posted by Terms777

To even think of something like this you have to have repressed homosexual tendencies.

Funny yes! Me homo? No! My libido tells me not to be gay. No offence!

edit on 20-1-2011 by Terms777 because: (no reason given)

What does man have to have sex, just an erection. Its possible to make any man homo, and i reckon they know it already.

Noooooooooooooo! haha

reply to post by Terms777


Yes it is, they already know how to make anyone homo.

If you do not want to know, thats your bag. But i reckon they could make anyone homo, no matter how straight you think you are.

I reckon its to do with spirituality, and its not all in your genes.

Originally posted by Terms777

To even think of something like this you have to have repressed homosexual tendencies.

Funny yes! Me homo? No! My libido tells me not to be gay. No offence!

edit on 20-1-2011 by Terms777 because: (no reason given)

Sorry, confusing sentence.
No not the posters here.
I meant the guys at the military who conceived of the project must have had repressed or latent tendencies.
Repressed tendencies and a massive lack of knowledge of actually being gay, and what this means.

reply to post by halfoldman

I can't help but be reminded of the 1979 version of the musical Hair, and the song Black boys/White boys, and its military theme.
I hope it's no longer considered offensive, well here it's been on daytime TV and it's an old hat.

I think it would be kind of cool if they could come up with a hand held aerosal spray of this 'gay gas'. Call it 'Rainbow Spray'. It would be a huge seller. Just think how cool it could be. A woman is about to be raped, she pulls out that multi colored bottle of Rainbow Spray and Voila! That rapist would suddenly be all embarrassed and run away from that woman.
Or if a snarling pitbull was about to attack you, you spray that dog and I bet that dog would be so dog-gone confused that he would just sit there wondering "What the heck?"
How about this. You make a bet with a friend that you can go into the toughest bar in the world and come out without a scratch. Walk into that bar. Immediately all the tough guys surround you. You start spraying that Rainbow Spray and start singing Liza Minelli songs. Those guys would escort you to the door and wave bye bye much to the amazement of your friend who's sitting in the car.
I like the possibilities here.

reply to post by withopeneyes

I see your point, but wouldn't the danger be that they would rape the next available guy?
In SA it took a long time to even have male rape recognized as an equal crime to female rape, and this protection for males from other males only came with gay rights.
At worst male rape was just considered assault.
Nevertheless there remains a huge problem with male-on-male rape, and often officialdom just still turns a blind eye.
I think it is just as traumatic as male-on-female rape, and physically more damaging and risky as far as HIV goes.
Of course, if a group of potential rapists end up raping each other instead of the victim - that would be poetic justice!

Thinking back to 1994, perhaps some of the military stereotypes were less about sex or a strategic orgy of butch soldiers.
Perhaps they were thinking that the "gay bomb" would cause the "homosexualized" enemy men to flap their wrists and shriek every time they heard gunfire, and to exchange their guns for make-up and perfume.
Perhaps they thought of gays as lily-livered fops.
All these feminized, submissive queens would then hand themselves in to the powerful, gorgeous US marines.
If that's the case, boy did they get it wrong.

reply to post by halfoldman


The idea, was the troops of the opposition would be attracted to each other, and cause disharmony.

thats the point of what they wanted.

Originally posted by halfoldman
Thinking back to 1994, perhaps some of the military stereotypes were less about sex or a strategic orgy of butch soldiers.
Perhaps they were thinking that the "gay bomb" would cause the "homosexualized" enemy men to flap their wrists and shriek every time they heard gunfire, and to exchange their guns for make-up and perfume.
Perhaps they thought of gays as lily-livered fops.
All these feminized, submissive queens would then hand themselves in to the powerful, gorgeous US marines.
If that's the case, boy did they get it wrong.

edit on 20-1-2011 by halfoldman because: (no reason given)

Thats whats so funny to me.. as if ALL gay men are feminine and ALL gay women are butch. Absurd sterotypes abound. Also EVERYONE knows that ALL gay men are hypersexualized and run around humping everything in sight while flaming around and dressing smartly.. if you make folks gay with a bomb they will just become so overcome with the natural gay urges they wont fight back. RIght??

According to Woody Alan, in the future they will have 'The Orgazmatron'! I saw it work in the movie 'Sleeper' so it must be true!

Military 'Think Tanks' always come up with screwy ideas on how to create new weapons and some of them are even wackier than this one. Like using Bats to deliver fire bombs. What's strange is that some of them actually work!

Zindo

reply to post by Advantage

Yes, and the hardcore military men may have been more swayed by right-wing, personal religious views of gays.
Such religious texts argue that historical empires were destroyed by their tolerance of homosexuality, and that being gay was being a feminized male, and this eventually weakened and made now extinct empires decadent.
In the homophobic, religious scheme of history, homosexuality made peoples weak, and eventually vulnerable and extinct.
(Wanted to add a link to illustrate the point, but I refuse to link to hate groups.)
Suffice to say there was (and is) a belief that all cultures who have tolerated homosexuality are now extinct.
Now if somebody subscribes to that misinterpretation of history, then making enemies "gay" seems perfectly logical.

Originally posted by halfoldman
reply to post by Advantage

 

Yes, and the hardcore military men may have been more swayed by right-wing, personal religious views of gays.
Such religious texts argue that historical empires were destroyed by their tolerance of homosexuality, and that being gay was being a feminized male, and this eventually weakened and made now extinct empires decadent.
In the homophobic, religious scheme of history, homosexuality made peoples weak, and eventually vulnerable and extinct.

Revisionist history.. gotta love it

reply to post by Advantage


No everyone is within a scale of extreme feminism and extreme masculine. Everyone exists between that scale of those two extremes.

So there is alot of room for swing, and there can be all sorts of gays and straight males and females.

Originally posted by andy1033
reply to post by Advantage

 

No everyone is within a scale of extreme feminism and extreme masculine. Everyone exists between that scale of those two extremes.

So there is alot of room for swing, and there can be all sorts of gays and straight males and females.

I was being sarcastic, Andy.