It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by brainsandgravy
HA HA! Of course it's the "wrong angle, wrong lighting. wrong background. wrong everything"--it's the filming of a different event.
Originally posted by brainsandgravy
It is similar though in that it shows distant banking airplanes against a clear blue sky. The question though, is can video compression artifacts cause the apparent sudden disappearance of detail such as an airplane wing.
Originally posted by brainsandgravy
Obviously, as is demonstrated here, it can--unless you believe this clip is also fake.
How do you explain in this clip one wing on both plains completely vanishing?
Originally posted by elnine
Originally posted by brainsandgravy
HA HA! Of course it's the "wrong angle, wrong lighting. wrong background. wrong everything"--it's the filming of a different event.
I rest MY case
Originally posted by brainsandgravy
It is similar though in that it shows distant banking airplanes against a clear blue sky. The question though, is can video compression artifacts cause the apparent sudden disappearance of detail such as an airplane wing.
yes and no.
in general, perhaps yes it can. But in the case of 9/11, NO IT CAN'T where there's unusual circumstances, evidence needed to be examine, and context to incorporate/consider/factor in before one can conclude what you'd like most to believe that its as simple as COMPRESSION artifacts.
But No, it isn't even SIMILAR at all... so unless you can show a COMPARABLE example, your argument is irrelevant and proves or disproves nothing.... The entire clip of that video is filled with artifacting due to far more compression affecting even the cloudy sky. Not true in the 9/11 vids... totally different dynamics are occurring and involved.
Originally posted by brainsandgravy
Obviously, as is demonstrated here, it can--unless you believe this clip is also fake.
How do you explain in this clip one wing on both plains completely vanishing?
You continue to dodge several posts that have addressed and debunked the compression issue which you've failed to logically refute or explain away how its possible the SAME anomalies show the same right wing disappear at the exact same time, while being recorded in totally different position, angle, and height....
the hologram/cgi around the "thing" that hit the tower, failed at the last moment.
edit on 25-11-2010 by elnine because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Angelwerks
reply to post by Korg Trinity
Its smoke. The wing enters a diffused smoke and seems to disappear.
Originally posted by Angelwerks
I saw the plane hit from the rear on the news live on that day.
Originally posted by Angelwerks
The wing was there and i will never forget the feeling.
Originally posted by Angelwerks
There is no conspiracy. Government isn't smart enough to cover up a blow job in the white house, let alone 2 planes killing many, some of who i knew and did business with.
Think a bit before posting kindle that can start a fire.
Originally posted by brainsandgravy
Any thoughts on the plausibility of this?
Originally posted by Anonymous Acorn
Originally posted by iamsupermanv2
reply to post by Korg Trinity
So...I find most of these videos of OMG 9/11 PROOFS!!!111 to be really lame, but I am seeing exactly what you are seeing.
The plane goes in and then the wing "disappears". I don't know if it's an optical illusion or what, but it's there, then it "isn't"
Very interesting...
As crazy as this sounds... and saying it is against my better judgment... because I've never even heard anyone else mention this before... but is it possible that what we actually witnessed on 9/11 was a hologram portrayed as an attack just before the buildings fell under a controlled demolition??? Not saying that's what I believe... just wondering what others might suspect after watching this video???
Originally posted by stimmy
Originally posted by Anonymous Acorn
As crazy as this sounds... and saying it is against my better judgment... because I've never even heard anyone else mention this before... but is it possible that what we actually witnessed on 9/11 was a hologram portrayed as an attack just before the buildings fell under a controlled demolition??? Not saying that's what I believe... just wondering what others might suspect after watching this video???
Exactly my thoughts.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by Korg Trinity
WAIT a minute!!!!
ARE YOU trying to slither away from an earlier claim????
And I stand by my original premise that what hit the WTC was not the commercial air liners that the OS stated. It was something else and then was covered over using post editing techniques.
How could I be any clearer??
Korg.
As the plane approached the south tower, it entered the shadow of the thick smoke from tower 1 (see the Park Foreman footage to watch this happen: youtu.be... ). This is why the plane looks black. It's shaded from direct sunlight. Seen from the ground, the bright blue sky acts as a back-light causing the plane to be seen in dark silhouette. However, just prior to impact as the plane is banking, the right wing emerges from shadow into direct sunlight. This can be seen happening in all videos of the second plane which have the right wing in view just before impact.
So why does the wing disappear in some videos? It's due to lossy digital video compression. From this east side angle the sunlight reflecting off of the underside of the wing is so close in color to the backgroud sky that compression algorithms don't distinguish between the two. The wing therefore becomes part of the pixelated blue sky. Videos posted for viewing on the internet are always heavily compressed to conserve bandwidth. Lossy compression codecs, even a high quality mpeg2 used for comercial DVD's, discard the majority of the original video data. Typical lossy compression codecs will:
- Reduce color nuances within the image.
- Reduce the color resolution with respect to the prevailing light intensity.
- Remove small, invisible parts of the picture.
- Compare adjacent images and remove redundant image data that are unchanged between them.
In this video I used an uncompressed copy of the video footage and added some contrast to it after zooming in. The wing can still be seen. Even though the original video is in standard definition, I had to convert it to HD before uploading it to youtube. Why? Because even when I uploaded a high-quality AVI in original format, the flash video compression used by youtube kept erasing the plane's wing!
Set your youtube player to HD quality for the clearest image of the "missing wing".
Note: I discovered after making this post that someone else had already up-loaded this same clip in HD format back in July. See it here:
youtu.be...
Can you see the wing?
Get the uncompressed clip here:
911datasets.org...:3FFVH7GCZ7HHIJP2K57GLVUXT3SERM4U
(I made this video when I came across "9/11 Vanishing Wing in HD (Best Video Ever)WOW!!! Debunk This" (youtu.be...). So I accepted the challenge since similar videos are still getting lots of hits on youtube.)
care to explain the nose of the plane coming out of the building seemingly completely intact???
Originally posted by Korg Trinity
reply to post by lunarasparagus
Very interesting... care to explain the nose of the plane coming out of the building seemingly completely intact???
Korg...
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by Korg Trinity
care to explain the nose of the plane coming out of the building seemingly completely intact???
Except it wasn't the nose of the plane.....