It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It is a valid question, because to be honest, I don't understand the flipside of that argument. What does loving someone have to do with having sex with someone else? It sounds noble, and it is politically correct, but the fact is that a very, very high percentage of marriages have infidelity. Does that mean they don't love each other?
I can honestly say that I have loved many women. I have also had sex with many women. The two lists are not mutually exclusive. Many of the women that I have loved were never sexual partners, and many of the women that were sexual partners were the farthest thing from love. Hell, I didn't even like some of them!
I suppose you and I will never understand one another. I am never jealous. I am supremely confident in my role as a husband, father, and lover. If my wife forgets how good I am, she is welcome to try some other loser and she will quickly be reminded why she married me. I expect the courtesy of honesty if that day ever comes, because I would feel hurt if she chose to do it behind my back. I am attracted to a lot of women, I very rarely act on it, but if I were overwhelmed by an attraction, maybe even an emotion for another women, it would not mean that I don't love my wife, it only means that I also have feelings for someone else.
Why is that hard to understand? Don't you love your mother AND your father? Brother AND Sister? Why not wife AND girlfriend!!
Originally posted by Wyn Hawks
...christian husbands have long been forcing their wives into sexual submission... it used to be very common for fully matured christian males to take barely matured females as their wives or concubines (whores)... lots of them justified their behavior with scriptures from the bible and lots of them still do (even the females) - but - we're not supposed to notice or mention or talk about that reality, huh?...
The difference here would be that Sharia law isn't "used to be common".
it used to be very common for fully matured christian males to take barely matured females as their wives or concubines
Originally posted by Alora
So then it must not be possible for a wife to rape her husband? (read: sodomy) If the woman wants it, then the husband has to lay there and take it. Rules are rules, after all
it used to be very common for fully matured christian males to take barely matured females as their wives
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
Originally posted by Alora
So then it must not be possible for a wife to rape her husband? (read: sodomy) If the woman wants it, then the husband has to lay there and take it. Rules are rules, after all
LOL! Love it, love it, brilliant idea.
We probably won't understand each other, but believe me theres more people who would class me as normal and you as abnormal I don't mean that in an offensive way but it's true...
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by Americanist
ITS RAPE!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by ladyinwaiting
reply to post by Death_Kron
lol. Actually in this case, a better word might be vindictive.
Controversial pastor Cedric Moss has vocally opposed the legislation claiming the amendment would create a "society of rapists." Citing the "word of God", Mr Moss argued that rape cannot be committed in marriage because the couple gave each other authority over the other's body and agreed to open-ended sexual consent in the marriage contract.
politicalhumor.about.com...
I know this is painful for the ladies to hear, but if you get married, you have accepted the headship of a man, your husband. Christ is the head of the household and the husband is the head of the wife, and that's the way it is, period."
Social conservative women believe in a strict division of gender roles as decreed by the scriptures. Gender is envisioned as a hierarchal ordering with God and Christ at the top, followed by men, and then women
By getting married, the woman has consented to sex, and I don't think you can call it rape.