It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by 547000
I'm defending her because most people are being retarded.
Originally posted by 547000
They only care about cute animals, besides which throwing animals in rivers was an established practice.
Originally posted by 547000
They want her arrested because she wasn't somber while doing what she was told to do.
Originally posted by 547000
And of all the retarded things to do they're charging them plenty of money when they couldn't afford to euthanize the dogs in the first place.
Originally posted by 547000
Why is feeding the dogs a bad idea? Some people eat dogs. You can't be hypocritical if the hungry are fed food. Or do you care more about animals than human beings? The dogs would die anyway; better not let them go to waste. But oh wait, the internet squad likes puppies, better not eat them or they will track you down and make your life a living hell!
Originally posted by zerbot565
reply to post by DrumsRfun
is it normal for people to sit on their asses and watch tv while millions of children starve dirctly cause of western interfarence in local goverments ?
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
What this story has shown is when united the masses have a powerful voice that is heard and prompts action.
Originally posted by loam
reply to post by ProtoplasmicTraveler
Originally posted by ProtoplasmicTraveler
What this story has shown is when united the masses have a powerful voice that is heard and prompts action.
While I think most might interpret that as a hopeful prospect, I find the notion terrifying.
Personally, this story is ridiculous for many of the reasons already mentioned in this thread. :shk: