It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by macthistle
This plane exists! The technology exists and it’s been about for a while and this plane has existed for a number of years. The existence of this plane was even leaked by an American general in a press conference a few years a go. It was spotted in the North Sea because the American military uses the British air strips in Scotland because of the remoteness of the area. There are probably now planes the American military have developed that are even faster than the Aurora. THIS PLANE EXISTS!
[edit on 2-4-2006 by macthistle]
Originally posted by Canada_EH
reply to post by RussiaUSA
May I suggest to rethink blasting in here with no real proof yourself. A Generals word can't be trusted if your asking about black projects so why even bother as it doesn't secure funding to spread a rumor, trust me black projects that do exist are above that. 2nd the B-2 bomber was developed during the time the the mythical aurora was "supposedly developed" the tech that is involved in low RCS at that time wasn't transferable to high speed flight. At hypersonic speeds that speed is your stealth as you dam easy to track unless your plasma wake is somehow helping you.
Originally posted by Canada_EH
unless plasma wake is somehow helping you.
Originally posted by _Del_
Originally posted by Canada_EH
unless plasma wake is somehow helping you.
I can't think of a reason it wouldn't. In addition, some of the shaping beneficial at hypersonic speeds just might be beneficial to your RCS. And some of the materials just might be capable of being used as RAM in certain situations. Add to that available active measures. I don't know how you'd be able to make it VLO really, especially at all wavelengths (especially IR!), but I think you're likely overstating the visibility of the final product.
[edit on 16-10-2008 by _Del_]
The experimental X-43A hypersonic research aircraft, part aircraft and part spacecraft, will be dropped from the wing of a modified B-52 aircraft, boosted to nearly 100,000 feet altitude by a booster rocket and released over the Pacific Ocean to briefly fly under its own power at seven times the speed of sound, almost 5,000 mph.
The flight is part of the Hyper-X program, a research effort designed to demonstrate alternate propulsion technologies for access to space and high-speed flight within the atmosphere. It will provide unique "first time" free flight data on hypersonic air-breathing engine technologies that have large potential pay-offs.
The $250 million program began with conceptual design and scramjet engine wind tunnel work in 1996. In a scramjet (supersonic-combustion ramjet), the flow of air through the engine remains supersonic, or greater than the speed of sound, for optimum engine efficiency and vehicle speed. A scramjet operates by supersonic combustion of fuel in a stream of air com,pressed by the high forward speed of the aircraft, as opposed to a normal jet engine, in which the compressor blades compress the air. Scramjets start operation at about Mach 6, or six times the speed of sound. There are few or no moving parts in a scramjet engine, but achieving proper ignition and combustion in a matter of milliseconds proved to be an engineering challenge of the highest order.
Researchers believe these technologies may someday offer more airplane-like operations and other benefits compared to traditional rocket systems. Rockets provide limited throttle control and must carry heavy tanks filled with liquid oxygen, necessary for combustion of fuel. An air-breathing engine, like that on the X-43A, scoops oxygen from the air as it flies. The weight savings could be used to increase payload capacity, increase range or reduce vehicle size for the same payload.
Originally posted by Aim64C
We found this out with the SR-71. While it had very small returns (for its size) at subsonic and low supersonic speeds - once it got up to its cruising speeds, it had a much stronger radar return that was caused by the difference between the hot air being generated by moving that fast and the ambient cold air.
the SR-71 was still easy to track by radar and had a huge infrared signature when cruising at Mach 3.2 or more
Originally posted by Canada_EH
I guess I need to ask something simple flat out and see what others think as this question is bothering me. How can something that hot around the 230 degree Celsius mark on say the 71 be untrackable to IR missiles? (higher temps if we talk hypersonic)
Originally posted by _Del_
I'd suspect that mixing airflow like that isn't really feasible in this instance.
Richard, you might know more about this than I do (which isn't much): As far as IR, won't most seeker heads reject signatures that are too hot and/or too bright (the sun, a decoy, etc)? Could this help your hypersonic vehicle? Are certain parts of the spectrum ignored to find the typical spectrum that includes jet efflux? And if so can you purposely manipulate your IR emission to parts of the spectrum ignored (like that of the sun, for instance)?