It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by backinblack
NO....again, you aren't understanding.....what you are referring to are the numerous (slanted and usually vaguely worded) polls and surveys?? Read the questions they ask...then re-evaluate what you wrote:
.....one thing that is a proven FACT is that people who NOW believe the Government version of events on 9.11 are well and trully in the minority..
SEE if any of those polls ask specific quiestions, such as "inside job", and crap like that......
The only "government version" of events that has people sensing a "cover-up" is due to what I HAVE MENTIONED dozens of times before.....it is the twisting and evasion of the events that LED UP to that day.
It is very simple.....once it had happened, the inevitable finger-pointing started. And eveyone even remotely involved immediately began to find ways to cover their butts.....thousands of different ways.
THAT is the whole of it....people who knew that, for many and varied reasons, they FAILED big time, wanted to make sure the taint of that failure fell on someone, anyone OTHER than them.
The inter-agency rivalry is unacceptable, and those people (with their egos, and hubris, and petty squabbles and personal vendettas and self-aggrandizment attitudes) KNOW that if the details of how incompetent, and schizophrenic the various Intel agencies were, it would reflect poorly on them individually.
CIA, FBI, NSA, etc etc.......they were all dysfuctional, especially in dealing with each other. "Turf Wars", that sort of thing.
THERE...that is your "conspiracy"....and, it is going to be a lot more difficult to unravel allof those details. There is, though, NOTHING to indicate any internal "collusion", in the sense that so, so many moronic so-called "truth" sites try to claim.
They dropped the ball....and, WHEN faced with the actual reality, those (also in the "government") made a valiant, valiant effort....much is just not known, nor understood....by the majority of "truthers"...because they don't read much beyond their computer screens.
There are many, many books that, when all read together, help to give a feel for the incredible ways that people adapted to a very confusing, complicated and fast-changing situation. AN unheard-of situation.
I think one of the best ones, chronicaling the aviation aspect, to include NORAD's response, is "Touching History", by author (and airline pilot) Lynn Spencer.
How many actual books have any so-called "truthers" read, besides the tripe that only supports their delusions??
Another that describes the WTC is "102 minutes"...Jim Dwyer and Kevin Flynn......
edit on 22 January 2011 by weedwhacker because: (no reason given)
I merely stated people do not believe the OS..
Cool your jets....the point is, by mentioning this:
Part 25 aircraft are also required to have design enhancements that allow continued safe flight after certain structural failures that would make a Part 23 aircraft unairworthy. G-loading tolerances are just one of the differences between the two aircraft design standards.
www.stickandthrottle.com...
In any event, the Vg-Diagram (as attempted to "shoehorn" into representing a "B-75/76" ...or any other Boeing, or Airbus) is irrelevant.
In any case....by reading the link above (AND, even the "Handbook", from where the diagram appears to have been lifted).
Originally posted by backinblackSo is the Vg diagram that they posted correct or not?
UPSIDE DOWN IN AN AIRPLANE? NOW WHAT?
If it's not then please post a correct one...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by backinblack
If it's not then please post a correct one...
The Boeing Commercial Aircraft Co. doesn't make any such chart for its products.
well its a powered decent, there is no "dive bombing" as you put it