It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by depth om
reply to post by Annee
What is god, can't have an argument without understanding the subject material.
In my opinion there are too many semantic interpretations, rendering any constructive argument null, the only way to argue and debate is if both parties agree on what it is they are discussing.
Oddly, the exact history of the word God is unknown. The word God is a relatively new European invention, which was never used in any of the ancient Judaeo-Christian scripture manuscripts that were written in Hebrew, Aramaic, Greek or Latin. According to the best efforts of linguists and researchers, the root of the present word God is the Sanskrit word hu which means to call upon, invoke, implore. Nonetheless, it is also interesting to note the similarity to the ancient Persian word for God which is Khoda. The following is a survey of some of the efforts of those who have been trying to decipher the ancient roots of the word God: Webster's 1913 Dictionary: \God\ (g[o^]d), n. [AS. god; akin to OS. & D. god, OHG. got, G. gott, Icel. gu[eth], go[eth], Sw. & Dan. gud, Goth. gup, prob. orig. a p. p. from a root appearing in Skr. h[=u], p. p. h[=u]ta, to call upon, invoke, implore. [root]30. Cf. [Goodbye], [Gospel], [Gossip].]
Google Video Link |
Originally posted by BlasteR
IMO, this thread has thus-far told us two important things.
Originally posted by depth om
reply to post by Annee
did you just watch zeitgeist?
I don't know what god is because I do not have all the information there is in the universe. My notion of god is that it is the initial generator and mutual attractor of the fractal that is the universe.
Originally posted by izero
Hi All,
It is an important issue because religious groups often get involved into public debate and their opinons are biased by their belief system. Therefore their religious beliefs must also be debated.
This also ties in to that old hypocrisy, whereby the religious can comment on whatever they want, however no-one can comment on the religious.
I also believe it to be an important debate as here in australia, faith based schools recieve funding from federal government. It agitates me a great deal knowing my tax money is going towards the indoctrination of children into false belief systems.
Thanks (first time poster).
Originally posted by silent thunder
Pondering this a bit more deeply, I guess that when it comes to religion, I don't really *believe* as much as I *feel.* To me, this takes religion out of the realm of "belief" and into...well, a totally different kind of experience.
Originally posted by Annee
I support Zero God in government. Any God. Government is like a business. Businesses need to be run by logic and the bottom line that provides and supports EVERY citizen equally. Personal belief systems have no business in government.
Originally posted by thegoodearth
Originally posted by Annee
I support Zero God in government. Any God. Government is like a business. Businesses need to be run by logic and the bottom line that provides and supports EVERY citizen equally. Personal belief systems have no business in government.
Hello, Annie.
Though I am not here to debate your theology, or lack thereof, I am curious if you live in the United States?
If so, have you read the Declaration of Independence?
I know you did not ask me, but if you don't mind, I'd like to answer this question from my own perspective.
Originally posted by thegoodearth
You clearly must not believe in its validity. I am asking simply out of curiosity why you would choose to live here when you do not believe in the doctrines of which the United States was founded on. I am not being a smart aleck, truly, I am just wondering... no matter how many people try to explain this away, these are the truths upon which these documents were written, and I wonder how you feel living under them... Thanks for your response. Again, not trying to offend, just wondering.
Not sure what you mean here but I'll take a guess. I would argue that Atheism is a true belief, I believe it a strongly as another may believe in christ, and I have just as reasonable reasons for believeing it. Just remember, claiming to be an Atheist only means I don't believe in god or gods in any shape or form. My views on spirtuality, the soul, or the afterlife are not included in that label.
In the Constitution, religion also was actually defined as a true belief, not a right to believe in nothing...