It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by edmc^2
Due to the DESIRE to believe something that is not, evolutionist will try give the most illogical explanation to something that is so simple, clear and logical. Case in point – this simple test.
Originally posted by edmc^2
Evolutionist I can prove to you that what you believe (evolution) is based on illogical reasoning,
Originally posted by soleprobe
Good job.... but the evolution theory is very similar to the climate change theory... it's roots are political... thus only logic that directs towards that political objective will be used.
Originally posted by OzWeatherman
Originally posted by edmc^2
Due to the DESIRE to believe something that is not, evolutionist will try give the most illogical explanation to something that is so simple, clear and logical. Case in point – this simple test.
And creationists do...
...
Edit to add- Your test proves absolutely nothing...its not the desire to believe, its observing and interpreting data and following patterns which lead to ones conclusion
Too many of these thread topics on ATS
[edit on 17/7/2010 by OzWeatherman]
Your test proves absolutely nothing...its not the desire to believe, its observing and interpreting data and following patterns which lead to ones conclusion
THEY ALL REQUIRE A CREATOR
If a robot requires an intelligent 'creator' why wouldn't the human body require a 'creator' a more advance intelligent Creator?
A machine requires a 'creator' while a human body does not require one. Makes sense?
Due to the DESIRE to believe something that is not, evolutionist will try give the most illogical explanation to something that is so simple, clear and logical. Case in point – this simple test.
Originally posted by Romantic_Rebel
Is this just another anti-Atheist and anti-Evolution thread on ATS? It's not like we have seen the same threads over and over again. What is with creationist wanting disprove Atheism and Evolution? The original poster has no clue what he is talking about. Making fun of evolution and calling it childish will not make it seem logical creation is correct. For easily understanding evolution check out this great site.
evolution.berkeley.edu...
www.swarthmore.edu...
www.usbible.com...
[edit on 17-7-2010 by Romantic_Rebel]
Conclusion:
Due to the DESIRE to believe something that is not, evolutionist will try give the most illogical explanation to something that is so simple, clear and logical. Case in point – this simple test.
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by edmc^2
f) One is known to be man-made, the other is naturally occurring.
Your quiz is highly flawed.
Originally posted by edmc^2
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by edmc^2
f) One is known to be man-made, the other is naturally occurring.
Your quiz is highly flawed.
So if a simple pencil requires a maker (man-made) then the bird does not require a maker because it's naturally occuring. In other words, the one known was "caused" while the other more complex "thing' was not caused.
Am I understanding you correctly?
ty,
edmc2
Originally posted by edmc^2
...the desire to believe on something that is not.
Originally posted by edmc^2
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by edmc^2
f) One is known to be man-made, the other is naturally occurring.
Your quiz is highly flawed.
So if a simple pencil requires a maker (man-made) then the bird does not require a maker because it's naturally occuring. In other words, the one known was "caused" while the other more complex "thing' was not caused.
Am I understanding you correctly?
ty,
edmc2
Again, your comparisons are completely redundant. A pencil (an inanimate object) vs a complex system of gases and matter....there's nothing to compare, they are two different things....your test is yet another BS test creationists use to reassure themselves that a creator exists.