It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FoosM
NASA is and was run by humans.
Goodluck
I am confused why one of these pictures has a flat black background while the other appears to be fogged by something.
Originally posted by FoosM
Well since you are here, and you say you have forgotten where you were... let me summarize by having you
solve the following:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/53b331ce7bce.gif[/atsimg]
Where did the Sampler go?
Originally posted by backinblack
One of the main questions in that series of pics is the sampler..
Pic 1..Sampler in holder near left hand..
Pic 2..Sampler is in his right hand..
Pic 3..Sampler is gone...
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by SayonaraJupiter
I am confused why one of these pictures has a flat black background while the other appears to be fogged by something.
You are confused because (I am guessing) you grew up in an era of digital cameras and digital video.
I understand that, what I don't see is where the question leads. He could have dropped the sampler, he could have placed it somewhere out of frame etc.
How is it possible that NASA would fake a sequence of photos, taking more than one take to do it, and forget that the main character was holding a sampler? Does this really sound like a convincing piece of evidence that the whole thing is a hoax to you?
Originally posted by exponent
If your best answer to the question of why is 'people make mistakes', then it's not a very credible argument is it? In your eyes it seems that any tiny anomaly condemns the case for us travelling to the moon, wheras in reality tiny anomalies occur regularly. None of us can sufficiently model or understand the behaviour of those suits enough to answer some of your questions, but the existence of those questions does not damage the credibility of a moon mission unless there is some reasoning involved.
Your reasoning seems to be 'it looks odd to me', and you have no further argument to back that up. This is insufficient to claim evidence for any sort of hoax, and frankly promotes terrible 'my side, your side' debate.
Originally posted by backinblack
I agree but it's still odd..
The NASA transcript says he is being photographed jumping into the Rover..
Apparently in under 4 secs but no ones sure..
I guess the question would be, why did he grab the sampler out of it's holder just to throw it away..
I don't know..
Originally posted by FoosM
My answer wasn't simply that people make mistakes.
My answers were that they are human.
It wasn't in its holder. Here's a clip from about 17 minutes before they got in the rover, showing the sampler on his yo-yo (a retractable tether on their belt):
Originally posted by backinblack
I guess the question would be, why did he grab the sampler out of it's holder just to throw it away..
I don't know..
Originally posted by exponent
Originally posted by FoosM
My answer wasn't simply that people make mistakes.
My answers were that they are human.
What particularly human property do they have which would render them incapable of realising an extremely obvious fact: If you take more photos in the time than you could have, it would be noticed by people like you?
Originally posted by nataylor
I think the sequence of motion went like this: He jumps up into the seat. In the process, the sampler that had been dangling on his yo-yo tether flies up, either from the momentum of the jump, or being knocked up by his leg. This is the point we see in AS17-134-20452. As the sampler comes up he knocks it (without actually grabbing it) with his left arm or hand towards his right side, where he grabs it with his right hand and pulls it to the right. This causes the yo-yo clip to disengage and retract back. This is the point we see in AS17-134-20453. Now since he had to aply some extra force to get the yo-yo clip to disengage, the sampler is still going to have some momentum carrying it to Schmitt's right. I think he doesn't have a solid grip on it in AS17-134-20453, and it comes out of his hand and continues on to his right, out of the frame of AS17-134-20454.
Originally posted by exponent
Originally posted by backinblack
I agree but it's still odd..
The NASA transcript says he is being photographed jumping into the Rover..
Apparently in under 4 secs but no ones sure..
I guess the question would be, why did he grab the sampler out of it's holder just to throw it away..
I don't know..
Neither do any of us, I doubt he even remembers why.
The point I am making is that even if it is odd, it's no evidence of a hoax unless it fits into a coherent body of evidence to support that theory. There are hugely long videos of EVAs on the moon, and if they can be shot without having to retake jumping into rover scenes, I think it's likely that 'odd' means just that, not 'hoax'.
Originally posted by FoosM
Have you ever thought that maybe that was the point?
When were all these photos released to the public?
Originally posted by FoosM
You got it backwards.
The ability to go to the moon is a theory.
Anyone claiming to have done it needs to prove that without a shadow of a doubt their evidence could not have been done on Earth or LEO. So far, every aspect of the moon mission could have been done on Earth.
Originally posted by FoosM
And the three photos are more than odd, they are wrong.
Originally posted by FoosM
For all you engineers... I have to ask.
Is this not dangerous?
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/0d05e68d3f57.gif[/atsimg]
Those protruding "teeth" could they not cause rips and tears to the suits?
If the astronauts jumped in, or jumped out of their rovers?
It is inconceivable that sharp objects like these would be placed where the alleged astronauts get in and out of the LRV.
Originally posted by exponent
Originally posted by FoosM
Have you ever thought that maybe that was the point?
When were all these photos released to the public?
I don't understand the question? What was the point you think NASA were aiming for? The photos have been released in various quantities and qualities over many years.
In other words, to say why NASA as one unit would do such and such, is oversimplifying the situation.