It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But what script are you talking about? The one where she says that all skeptics are close minded at the beginning of EVERY post? Or that we never look at the facts, when that's exactly what we look for?
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
By the by, you would do well to ignore MatrixRising. She operates off a script and cannot deviate from it; she will repeat the same lines and lies over and over, and ignore any questions her script cannot answer. It is useless to discuss anything with someone who so well defines the term "closed-minded". She is little more than an automaton.
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by Anamnesis
You say that not one single thought provoking questio was asked. However, I beg to differ. One example touched upon in the show were the Megalithic stones cut to such precision that it could not be duplicated today w/out the use of computers and high-tech cutting machines, the most intriguing of which can be found at the Puma-Punku ruins in Bolivia. Not only are these stones cut to precision they were mass produced as modular building blocks. Anyone who has cut stones will tell you that w/out the use of modern diamond cutting tools the task would be next to impossible to produce just one block.
Again suspiciously, the program failed to inform viewers that close inspection of the blocks at Puma Punka reveals chisel marks in the cuts.
See what I mean?
Harte
Originally posted by drew hempel
reply to post by Anamnesis
Oh you're a stone cutter? Brown's gas!
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
www.youtube.com...
That's how ancient civilization did it to the stones.
www.youtube.com...
Originally posted by drew hempel
reply to post by Anamnesis
www.svpvril.com...
www.google.com...
Yeah melting granite.
drax325 Well granite is mostly made of SiO2, which has melting point 1650'C (wiki). Hydrogen burns at I think more than 2000'C some sites say as much as 2300'C
Originally posted by Anamnesis
So... what kind of chisels are we talking about here? Copper? Brass?Forged Steel???
There are some estimates that Puma-Punku is about 14,000 yrs old, well before copper was first smelted (according to current theories)
Originally posted by Anamnesis
I'm not buying the whole chisel story. I'm a stone cutter!
This is what kills me about ATS. Lots of idots flapping their gums w/out amy practical knowledge or experience to back itup. What a joke.
Originally posted by Anamnesis
Originally posted by Harte
Again suspiciously, the program failed to inform viewers that close inspection of the blocks at Puma Punka reveals chisel marks in the cuts.
See what I mean?
Harte
Would be great if you provided a source. That way I don't have to take your word for it.
Originally posted by Anamnesis
With regards to Puma Punku's age: I mentioned that SOME estimate the age at between 14,000 and 17,000 years old. But it doesn't really matter if it the age isn't accurate. It wasn't built in the modern industrial age.
Originally posted by Anamnesis
Doom - Did you come here just to b*tch slap me or do you have anything of substance to add to the conversation?
Originally posted by Harte
Originally posted by Anamnesis
Originally posted by Harte
Again suspiciously, the program failed to inform viewers that close inspection of the blocks at Puma Punka reveals chisel marks in the cuts.
See what I mean?
Harte
Would be great if you provided a source. That way I don't have to take your word for it.
Can't do it right now, I'm at work.
It was on the web in a PDF of a paper published by one of the archaeologists that has worked at the site, though.
I believe it's linked around here at ATS somewhere.
I will try to find it and link it for you later.
And you're right, of course, about Brown's gas.
Re chisels, IIRC, the idea was that the stones were sawn and then the pieces chiseled out.
But, we'll see when I have time to locate the PDF for you.
In the meantime, what's your take on the Vimanika Shastra part I posted about?
Do you trust this "documentary" given the fact they pretended that the V.S. was an "ancient" Vedic text?
Harte
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
If you were not so self-absorbed, you would have noticed I've made other posts in this thread. Slapping you was just a bonus.
Originally posted by Anamnesis
Well... no, I don't trust the documentary entirely. You're dead on with regards to the Viminaka Shastra... I remember reading that it was "channeled" in relative recent times. But I'm not saying that the entire documentary should be taken as gospel either.... the intriguing parts for me were the megalithic stone sites.
Originally posted by Anamnesis
lol... ok tough guy... internet gangsta... hehe... keepin it real...
Originally posted by draknoir2
Originally posted by Anamnesis
Well... no, I don't trust the documentary entirely. You're dead on with regards to the Viminaka Shastra... I remember reading that it was "channeled" in relative recent times. But I'm not saying that the entire documentary should be taken as gospel either.... the intriguing parts for me were the megalithic stone sites.
Didn't the Rigveda also describe flying machines, and wasn't it written around 1500 BC?
Originally posted by DoomsdayRex
Originally posted by Anamnesis
lol... ok tough guy... internet gangsta... hehe... keepin it real...
Anamnesis, I hate to tell you this, but your racism is showing.