It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kiwasabi
Especially this one, which is great evidence for a bomb exploding in a Pennsylvania field:
www.layscience.net...
1. Flight 77 wreckage (from the landing gear) at the Pentagon. Conspiracy theorists used to argue that no plane ever hit the Pentagon, claiming that there was no visible debris at the site. They seem to have retreated from this claim in the last couple of years
Originally posted by SteveR
Originally posted by kiwasabi
Especially this one, which is great evidence for a bomb exploding in a Pennsylvania field:
www.layscience.net...
How is a smoke plume "great evidence for a bomb"? It looks very similar to the plumes of other plane crashes as shown here: media.photobucket.com...
Originally posted by SteveR
reply to post by kiwasabi
The ones on the right are stills from video which caught the moment of impact. The Shanksville plume was taken a significantly longer time after impact by a witness who went to reach for her camera.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Let's look at a different view of this photo:
The following image was recently released by the NYPD along with other images. It is a view of the same collapse as above, but from the NYPD helicopter:
[atsimg]http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/813a9e14d6ee.jpg[/atsimg]
Notice the two columns in the middle-left that have white smoke coming from the ends from just being cut with explosives? Pictures really are worth a thousand words.
If you take into account all the first responder testimony to the flashes in the lower/middle levels of both towers as they were collapsing, and take into account every other aspect of the collapses, controlled demolition is the only option for what we are seeing and what happened to those mighty towers that day.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
If you take into account all the first responder testimony to the flashes in the lower/middle levels of both towers as they were collapsing, and take into account every other aspect of the collapses, controlled demolition is the only option for what we are seeing and what happened to those mighty towers that day.
[edit on 11-4-2010 by _BoneZ_]
Originally posted by jthomas
Actually, no such claim can be made. No evidence for explosives has ever been found. The collapses were explained without the need to introduce the need for explosives. Your claim remains unsupported.
Originally posted by jthomas
You have no ability to say what you claim as "smoke" really is.
Originally posted by jthomas
it could be smoke from the fires that were burning
Originally posted by jthomas
but could equally be dust from disintegrating wallboard that covered the inner core
Originally posted by jthomas
You cannot eliminate those just from looking at a photo.
Originally posted by jthomas
No evidence for explosives has ever been found.
Originally posted by jthomas
The collapses were explained without the need to introduce the need for explosives.
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by jthomas
it could be smoke from the fires that were burning
Not on the very ends. You know, the exact place that would have been cut with explosives. Oh, and heating steel up to where it's red-hot will not cause it to smoke hardly at all. The steel has to be super-heated to smoke like that. And don't tell me any different because I work with steel and aluminum every day.
Originally posted by jthomas
but could equally be dust from disintegrating wallboard that covered the inner core.
Again, not coming from the very ends. You can actually see the gray dust coming from the rest of the length of those columns, but the white smoke coming from the ends stands out like a sore thumb.
Originally posted by jthomas
You cannot eliminate those just from looking at a photo.
Sure you can if you're researched and knowledgeable in the subject and know what you're looking at.
Originally posted by jthomas
No evidence for explosives has ever been found.
No evidence for anyone specifically searching for explosives has ever been found either.
Bodies, telephones, desks, everything in those towers were blown to tiny bits. I don't know how you think very much explosive evidence would have survived.
Originally posted by jthomas
The collapses were explained without the need to introduce the need for explosives.
The collapses are explained to the lay person who doesn't know any better, to those who are lacking in the logic and physics departments, to those who are unresearched, to those that don't fully understand the construction of the towers, and to those who's denial won't let them see past their own bias.