reply to post by jazz10
Out of curiosity, I've been through this thread and made a complate list of all the reasons that you've offered for believing that there will be
"Disclosure" during the South African World Cup. They are as follows;
Because Table Mountain is flat.
Because Jo'Burg is a "gold city".
Because Al Quaeda were threatening to attack the world cup.
Because there will be an eclipse at Easter island (but not in South Africa).
Because there was an advert showing a fictional kidnapping of David Beckham.
Because the USA team were growing in confidence.
Because people were blowing trumpets.
Because South Africa is a "rainbow nation".
Because a Japanese space probe was returning to earth (but not in South Africa).
Because World Cup stewards with pay complaints were fighting with police.
Because there was a volcano in Iceland (but not in South Africa).
Because there was an oil spill (but not in South Africa).
Because mineral deposits were found in Afghanistan (but not in South Africa).
Because NASA had a meeting about dealing with dangerous asteroids (but not in South Africa).
Because sounds were being produced by the magnetic field of the sun (but not in South Africa).
Because the Queen delivered a speech (but not in South Africa).
Because the Ark of the Covenant was found in Yemen (but not in South Africa).
So, basically, the argument is that anything vaguely newsworthy happening anywhere in the world is evidence that there is going to be Disclosure at
the World Cup Final.
The Latin phrase "Non sequitur" comes to mind. It does not follow.
This is not just one thread coming under test, but an entire method of argument.