It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In his letter, Southworth told school district leaders the new law promotes sexual assault of children, and warns that teachers who follow the law could be charged with misdemeanor or felony delinquency of a minor, with maximum punishments ranging from nine months in jail to six years in prison.
"For example, if a teacher instructs any student aged 16 or younger how to utilize contraceptives under circumstances where the teacher knows the child is engaging in sexual activity with another child -- or even where the 'natural and probable consequences' of the teacher's instruction is to cause that child to engage in sexual intercourse with a child -- that teacher can be charged under this statue," Southworth wrote.
Originally posted by endisnighe
Or do you not believe in our justice system?
The state law, called the Healthy Youth Act, took effect in March. Starting this fall, it requires schools with sex-education courses to teach students medically accurate, age-appropriate information, including how to use birth control and prevent sexually transmitted diseases. It also requires the classes to include information about how to recognize signs of abuse and how alcohol can affect decision making.
In his letter, Southworth told school district leaders the new law promotes sexual assault of children, and warns that teachers who follow the law could be charged with misdemeanor or felony delinquency of a minor, with maximum punishments ranging from nine months in jail to six years in prison.
Originally posted by iamsupermanv2
reply to post by eNumbra
I think what this DA is trying to say is if the kids know how to use a condom, know what sex is, know how to do it the "right" way, then they will totes be sex offenders.
Originally posted by iamsupermanv2
reply to post by OldDragger
eNumbra,
You could be right about that. I still think it's just as stupid.
Originally posted by getreadyalready
The problem is too many laws, too many interpretations, and not enough parenting!
I don't believe the state should have mandated this education. I also don't believe the DA should be prosecuting teachers for teaching?
The parents should decide if they don't want their children getting this type of education, and they should change their lawmakers, or change their state, or pull their kids from those schools.
Parents will be permitted to remove their children from sex-education classes, as they could under previous state law. Schools also will be allowed the choice of whether to offer sex education, but must notify parents if they decide not to.
Originally posted by endisnighe
Who are you to decide who gets charged with a crime? Prosecutors are duly elected people that decide who gets charged with crimes. The Jury decides if the statute is lawful and if the person committed it.
Or do you not believe in our justice system?
Can't go cherry picking the legislation you like and dislike can we now? /s
This is a trained lawyer you know, one just like the ones you people elect day in and day out to be your representatives that write the laws.
See how that works?