It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by damwel
reply to post by Mrmerak
Good lord, you still don't know any better than what you are saying? That's just more Rush Limbaugh crap you're spouting. The media is owned by rich corporatists and almost all of them tend to be republicans. This idea that the MSM are all left was just a fox tactic to give you a reason to believe their lies when every single other news outlet were telling you different.
Frum: "Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us and now we're discovering we work for Fox. And this balance here has been completely reversed. The thing that sustains a strong Fox network is the thing that undermines a strong Republican party."
Frum: "Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us and now we're discovering we work for the American public that watches Fox. And this balance here has been completely reversed. The thing that sustains a strong Fox network is the thing that undermines a strong Republican party."
Originally posted by mnemeth1
Fox does not dictate public opinion.
Fox puts on pundits and talk show hosts that reflect what people want to hear.
Originally posted by damwel
reply to post by Mrmerak
Good lord, you still don't know any better than what you are saying? That's just more Rush Limbaugh crap you're spouting. The media is owned by rich corporatists and almost all of them tend to be republicans. This idea that the MSM are all left was just a fox tactic to give you a reason to believe their lies when every single other news outlet were telling you different.
Part One: What Journalists Think
Surveys over the past 30 years have consistently found that journalists — especially those at the highest ranks of their profession — are much more liberal than rest of America. They are more likely to vote liberal, more likely to describe themselves as liberal, and more likely to agree with the liberal position on policy matters than members of the general public.
Most members of the media steadfastly deny the presence of left ideology in their profession. In the words of former CNN and CBS reporter Deborah Potter (as reported in The Boston Globe, January 17, 2002), "I have yet to see a body of evidence that suggests the reporting that gets on the air reflects any political bias." They imply that charges of media distortion are manifestations of conservative paranoia. But it is not exclusively conservatives who are concerned about changes in news covereage. In 2002, 60 Minutes commentator Andy Rooney said on CNN's Larry King Live: "There is just no question that I, among others, have a liberal bias. I mean, I'm consistently liberal in my opinions. And I think some of the, I think Dan [Rather] is transparently liberal. Now, he may not like to hear me say that. I always agree with him, too, but I think he should be more careful." Earlier, Newsweek Washington Bureau Chief Evan Thomas stated on Inside Washington, "There is a liberal bias. It's demonstrable. You look at some statistics. About 85 percent of the reporters who cover the White House vote Democratic, they have for a long time. There is a, particularly at the networks, at the lower levels, among the editors and the so-called infrastructure, there is a liberal bias."
Originally posted by mnemeth1
reply to post by 12GaugePermissionSlip
Frum: "Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us and now we're discovering we work for Fox. And this balance here has been completely reversed. The thing that sustains a strong Fox network is the thing that undermines a strong Republican party."
What he meant to say:
Frum: "Republicans originally thought that Fox worked for us and now we're discovering we work for the American public that watches Fox. And this balance here has been completely reversed. The thing that sustains a strong Fox network is the thing that undermines a strong Republican party."
Personally I think this is actually a good thing.
Fox does not dictate public opinion.
Fox puts on pundits and talk show hosts that reflect what people want to hear.
The people are pissed off at the rampant fascism of government. Fox is capitalizing on that anger, they aren't creating it.
He's got the cause and effect reversed.
Originally posted by 12GaugePermissionSlip
reply to post by OnceReturned
You have brought up the question. Who will follow who? Fox is in it just for the ratings which equals money. If republicans politicians continue to follow Fox's lead, Fox will drive that bus off a cliff in the name of great TV. However, if republicans try to buck them, Fox will have their viewers burn them down. That is what you get when you allow your body guards run things, and then try to assert authority again. I predict republicans will continue letting Fox dictate their positions.
What he meant to say:
Fox is capitalizing on that anger, they aren't creating it.
Originally posted by Janky Red
Three dollar bill you turned out to be
Certainly Fox dictates public opinion
Everyday Fox is regurgitated here, EVERYDAY
The rampant Fascist government was sanctioned and explained away for eight years
by Fox.
At least David is honest, surely he TANKED his career for the hell of it
Dave was like "fo*K it, I'm going ruin my career just to say something that is detrimental to my core beliefs"
Just like the wars, they manipulate you and manipulate you, Adolph could have forged
victory working with the lot of you.
Originally posted by Mrmerak
The fact is there is no such thing as an un-biased news outlet. I worked with an international news service - I know. If you agree with a news outlet's views it will reflect what you think and you will agree with its point of view. I like Fox because all the rest of the main stream media are liberal and I am not a liberal I am a conservative. If you don't like Fox you are a liberal. Simple and not complicated. If you cannot stand a little competition then go to a place that does not allow for any
competition.