It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Crop circles are evidential of what?! Encounters are evidential of what?!
In mid March, 1957, we received an urgent message from the Alexandria Police Department. The message indicated that two of their on-duty police officers had picked up an alien who had landed some 14 miles south of Pentagon Boulevard, and the occupant was transported to the Pentagon to meet with the Under Secretary of Defense and then shuttled underground to meet with President Eisenhower and Vice President Richard Nixon. The meeting lasted for nearly an hour and then, the alien visitor was put on VIP status and was shuttled back to the Pentagon where he spent the night in the Army reception office on the first floor near the concourse. This alien's name was Valiant Thor.
Commander James was on duty at the Security Clearance and Review for the branch officer of the Project Blue Book. He oversaw the meeting through official channels and reported the landing and meeting of the "space emissary", as he was labeled by the Department of Defense, to a governing group of high military officials including Secretary of Defense F.F. Forestall and other scientific men of which there were twelve. They in turn made recommendations to the President and Cabinet members, the CIA, FBI, NSA, and so on.
(snip)
Val Thor landed in Alexandria and met with the President to discuss the world's problems and offer advice and counsel on how to deal with and eliminate them. He indicated to Mr. Eisenhower that the world was in a precarious situation and that if the world continued to proceed on a war footing - it would cause an economic imbalance throughout the world. Val Thor stayed on Earth until March 16, 1960, and then disembarked to his home planet Venus.
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
Science would not agree with your POV. Evidence does the talking. So far it's quiet!
Whatever you hear of the reality of ET is not based on scientific evidence, it is based on hearsay.
There is no life, such as humans, on any other planet. We are it, this is it. We don't know what UFOs contain whether it's biological beings or robots and if robots where the handlers are. No one knows! You believe. Belief does not depend on evidence, it is a mental construct.
Wait until we have definite answers before you jump on the bandwagon.
Originally posted by chrisd250
reply to post by Historical-Mozart
my questions are...
1)how will the info be disclosed?
2)how will the religious people(who will be freaking out and violent and rioting) be kept calm...
3)who will be coming forward with such info/evidence and what would they show as proof?
4)why would they choose now to disclose if supposedly it's been known for quite some time?
Originally posted by Visiting ESB
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
Science would not agree with your POV. Evidence does the talking. So far it's quiet!
Whatever you hear of the reality of ET is not based on scientific evidence, it is based on hearsay.
There is no life, such as humans, on any other planet. We are it, this is it. We don't know what UFOs contain whether it's biological beings or robots and if robots where the handlers are. No one knows! You believe. Belief does not depend on evidence, it is a mental construct.
Wait until we have definite answers before you jump on the bandwagon.
The mistake you make, and most others who deny the existence of alien life, is that you demand scientific evidence. None is needed. In a courtroom, sometimes all that is needed is testimony of a credible eyewitness. We don't need to prove a bank robbery with a photograph. Just some good, credible witnesses. That constitutes acceptable evidence.
Your stance simply illustrates all-too-well the arrogance of "science." It is that very arrogance that makes it look so silly. Remember, it was the genius of science that said we cannot travel faster than 35 mph without deadly results, and, it was science that insisted, in no uncertain terms, that the earth was the center of the universe and that it was flat. Science frequently gets it wrong, primarily because of it's refusal to imagine the possibility that our current understanding is simply a step along the way and that we don't know nearly as much as we think.
Science cannot explain why we exist or why we can even think -- oh, it can say it's the neurons firing in our brains, but that is the physical portion, not the internal, non-physical -- and it cannot explain consciousness or the multitude of paranormal experiences of untold millions. To science, the solution is (and always has been) to deny the existence of that which it cannot explain. That, to me, is the height of intellectual cowardice.
[edit on 13-10-2009 by Visiting ESB]
[edit on 13-10-2009 by Visiting ESB]
I would agree. I think it is worth pointing though out that many pseudo-skeptics conflate their subjective points of view / metaphysics with science as well. SkepticalEd no doubt believes he is being "rational" and behaving "scientifically".
Originally posted by KingAmongstMen
You, like SkepticalEd, confuse science itself with scientists.
To knock science on the back of errors and stupidity made on behalf of scientists is pretty silly.
Originally posted by hoghead cheese
As to aliens coming to visit our planet and having evidence, it's always been in front of us and we just can't believe it. The reference to Gilgamesh and other ancient texts of going to the gods in the sky or seeing flying fire shields or fire chariots or as one description that never gets questioned is the 4 wheel contraptions that is seen by ancient people.
Originally posted by randomviolins
are we so arrogant to believe that aliens all over the universe have basically the same body configuration as us? And speak the native language of wherever they are?
Originally posted by StinkyFeet
I agree that there probably is life on other planets
Originally posted by Skeptical Ed
reply to post by Matrix Rising
Science would not agree with your POV. Evidence does the talking. So far it's quiet!
Whatever you hear of the reality of ET is not based on scientific evidence, it is based on hearsay.
There is no life, such as humans, on any other planet. We are it, this is it. We don't know what UFOs contain whether it's biological beings or robots and if robots where the handlers are. No one knows! You believe. Belief does not depend on evidence, it is a mental construct.
Wait until we have definite answers before you jump on the bandwagon.
Look at the way "aliens" act and look. They are dumb enough to crash land all over the planet. They are obsessed with our reproductive organs. They have a fixation on livestock. Does this sound like something aliens, who would have to traverse impossble distances to get here, would do?
Originally posted by KingAmongstMen
You, like SkepticalEd, confuse science itself with scientists.
To knock science on the back of errors and stupidity made on behalf of scientists is pretty silly.
Originally posted by autowrench
And lastly, the "impossible distances" you speak of are in third dimensional terminology. Have you not ever hear of wormholes, and bending space, or any other the many other techniques explored by the military and NASA over the years?