It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Digital_Reality
reply to post by A Fortiori
Yeah, I know it was a bit immature but she is someone that I truly despise.
My apolagies...
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
I am not defending Polanski or rapists in general and quite frankly I believe justice should be served in this case. There are good reasons why rape is illegal. However I don't think it is as simple as it has been presented here and I know I am not privy to all the information available.
He was offered a plea to a lesser charge which he accepted. A condition of that plea was his confession to a crime. Many of you are ignoring that important fact which could be interpreted as coercion by our judicial system. Again I don't know, but it is a possibility
Generally sex offenders do not stop their behavior even after being convicted and imprisoned. I asked if anyone could provide any other examples of criminal behavior perpetrated by Polanski. All we have is anecdotal evidence of a relationship with Natassia Kinski. Might be true but no charges have been filed.
One more thing...I find it deeply disturbing that all the crusaders for justice on this thread have made no mention of justice against the girls' parents.
If what has been presented is true then the mother should be brought up on charges and imprisoned for her role in endangering a minor. Examples need to be made so that perverted parents will not sell their children for sex. These parents need to realize there are serious criminal consequences for this behavior. I am a parent and I can assure my children would never be alone with any adult for a "photo shoot". I mean really!
Originally posted by John Matrix
I still don't see Polanski as having got away with anything. He served time and suffered before and during the trial.
His exile was provoked by what he and many others perceived to be an injustice.
He was willing to go to a six week diagnostic facility and tell people what they wanted to hear, not to go into "county" and serve time which is one of the sentencing options for that particular deed.
If not for that injustice, he was perfectly willing to accept his punishment and make restitution.
That he was able to work, make a new life for himself, make new friends, live well, and became a productive citizen has nothing to do with whether he should be punished further.....it speaks to his rehabbed character.
A criminal that straightens out his life and becomes successful is deserving of merit...IMHO.
Regardless how rich he became, he was still not able to come to the USA. For any man that made his home here....that would be a severe punishment to endure for 30 years.
As I said in another post, if the guy was a plumber he would be long forgotten and no one would care, but because he is a famous celeb. we have a prosecutor looking to get his face on television.
Originally posted by A Fortiori
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
Might be true? They both admitted being in a relationship. He admitted in an interview his preference for very young women. His pattern shows that he does tend to chase young women. In the US that is a crime. Elsewhere, no, but the place that he committed the crime, yes.
One more thing...I find it deeply disturbing that all the crusaders for justice on this thread have made no mention of justice against the girls' parents.
*sigh*
Read my posts. I'm crusading and said her parents should be beat with a rubber hose for allowing her to go there. As we do not know if they knew she would be raped we cannot convict them of conspiracy to commit rape, just bad parenting.
If what has been presented is true then the mother should be brought up on charges and imprisoned for her role in endangering a minor. Examples need to be made so that perverted parents will not sell their children for sex. These parents need to realize there are serious criminal consequences for this behavior. I am a parent and I can assure my children would never be alone with any adult for a "photo shoot". I mean really!
Agreed.
I have read your posts and find them overwrought, vindictive and self righteous.
Sorry I didn't interpret "Beat with a rubber hose" as a sincere cry for justice but another smug remark.
It is amusing how you can intuit Polanskis every behavior in meticulous detail yet you suddenly "don't know" if her mother was aware of her actions.
You still have not shown a pattern of criminal behavior just innuendo. How about some facts! His relationship with Kinski was not illegal.
Something else that Polanski said was " I didn't know how old she was." You are quick to quote him but you didn't mention that quote.
I think he was lying. My guess would be that you do also.
I am glad we agree that her mother should be charged and imprisoned.
Originally posted by A Fortiori
reply to post by Leo Strauss
Leo, her mother wasn't tried in a court like Polanski. We don't have her or anyone else's statements on record.
As to my "smug" attitude... smug, no. Smug implies a satisfaction that I do not have. "Angry" is more like it. However, call me smug. Call me angry. Call me vindictive, a harpy, a shrew, mean, whatever. On this topic I will not bend.
Forty four year old men who sleep with thirteen year olds regardless of consent are breaking the law. No one is above or beneath the law. Forty four year old men who rob the joy from a thirteen year old girl by plying her with drugs and forcing sex upon her are rapists.
I find it interesting that you will condemn me for words and give him a pass for his actions. Interesting, indeed.
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
Originally posted by A Fortiori
reply to post by Leo Strauss
Leo, her mother wasn't tried in a court like Polanski. We don't have her or anyone else's statements on record.
As to my "smug" attitude... smug, no. Smug implies a satisfaction that I do not have. "Angry" is more like it. However, call me smug. Call me angry. Call me vindictive, a harpy, a shrew, mean, whatever. On this topic I will not bend.
Forty four year old men who sleep with thirteen year olds regardless of consent are breaking the law. No one is above or beneath the law. Forty four year old men who rob the joy from a thirteen year old girl by plying her with drugs and forcing sex upon her are rapists.
I find it interesting that you will condemn me for words and give him a pass for his actions. Interesting, indeed.
I meant smug more along the lines of "contentedly confident of one's ability, superiority, or correctness; complacent".
It is obvious you are angry, more angry than the actual victim I would add.
Also you lied when you characterized my position regarding rape (strawman).
These examples of your behavior in our limited contact convince me that you could not be trusted render a fair verdict. You are excused.
Originally posted by A Fortiori
Forty four year old men who rob the joy from a thirteen year old girl by plying her with drugs and forcing sex upon her are rapists.
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
If you have the stomach for it check out what Polanski lived through. The fact his parents were butchered by the Nazis and his wife and unborn son were butchered by the Manson gang gives me sympathy for him. I know I am a softy and he should be repeatedly sodomized then taken out back and shot.
Originally posted by A Fortiori
Originally posted by TheColdDragon
reply to post by A Fortiori
Uhhhhhhh.....
Have you ever Read "Lolita"?
Your comments make me think perhaps you haven't.
Uhhh, I have. I realize Nabokov intentions with the novel but with any author or artist the reader may take a different message from the story than they intended. As a female I perceive Lolita differently and I see the whole novel as a form of mental masturbation and fantasy for men, whether that was the intention or not.
Originally posted by TheColdDragon
See the titles under my name? They are apt, they are accurate. My handle? Also accurate.
Originally posted by Valhall
lmao - good thing you've got those titles.
How about I shove a hot poker up your backside because your titles make me hot.
Oh...and it WILL be your fault. Because you're something else. *wink wink*
Originally posted by TheColdDragon
Originally posted by Valhall
lmao - good thing you've got those titles.
How about I shove a hot poker up your backside because your titles make me hot.
Oh...and it WILL be your fault. Because you're something else. *wink wink*
I've gotta ask if you mean hot in a good way, or if I get you irate and steamed.
I sure hope it's not the latter.
Originally posted by Leo Strauss
reply to post by A Fortiori
If you simply scroll up the screen you will see my position on rape and this case.
If you have the stomach for it check out what Polanski lived through. The fact his parents were butchered by the Nazis
and his wife and unborn son were butchered by the Manson gang gives me sympathy for him.
I don't think he should be shot. I think he should have gotten jail time.
I know I am a softy and he should be repeatedly sodomized then taken out back and shot.
I would bet he could have gotten off fairly easily on an insanity plea. Did it occur to you he might in fact have been insane at the time?