It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
totally Idiotic threads such as This Swill that can, forever, Discredit ATS.
It's so sad to see how many Lindsey Graham loving, dumbed-down Dweebs yearn for droppings like this.
Originally posted by WhatTheory
Here is the link and quote:
ModernGhana
For Ghana, Obama's visit will be a celebration of another milestone in African history as it hosts the first-ever African-American President on this presidential visit to the continent of his birth.
Bold is my emphasis.
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by cbianchi513
I guess air conditioners are evil British throwbacks too then.
Ever hear of a British Thermal Unit?
Really?
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by gr8fuldaniel
Just a minute, the Birthers will be along shortly to say that the article was edited to shut up the writer.
Originally posted by ravenshadow13
You're kidding, right?
Continent of his birth. As in his ancestry. As in where he came from genetically.
How in the world does this have 3 replies but 8 flags? Do people now just automatically flag any thread that supports the whole fake birth certificate thing??
[edit on 7/13/2009 by ravenshadow13]
Originally posted by whatukno
reply to post by cbianchi513
Whats in a name? That's the point I am trying to make here.
The point of fact that 35 of our founding fathers and most likely were part of the BAR.
Once again, disagree... This has nothing to do with the fourth amendment.
It has to do with the Constitution though, but certainly not the fourth amendment.
You see, when a candidate runs for the position of POTUS, it is the responsibility of the candidates party to properly vett said candidate.
Not just now that Mr. Soetoro has been sworn in, but during the campaign, this issue had been raised. The DNC simply did not properly satisfy this condition. The court of public opinion is not legally recognized, but is nonetheless one of the highest courts in the land.
I don't claim to know the answer of how exactly to handle this. I would think that Mr. Soetoro would want this issue cleared, and would be forthcoming with all available information proving his eligability. That does not seem to be the case.
He IS a sworn public official. Certainly he knew that there would always be muckrakers waiting in the wings.
WHY then, has he spent so much time, effort, and money to prevent his long form birth certificate being released. Certainly no honest man or woman can claim that Mr. Soetoro is acting on principle...
I mean, come on... We already established that the man is a politician.
Originally posted by argentus
reply to post by kinda kurious
Question, if you'll indulge me... do you know why Orly's Doctorate is always in quotations "Dr."? I saw that on the website you linked as well. Is her doctorate in question, or is she referred to as Dr. and doesn't have a doctorate?
Doesn't seem to be a wealth of information -- at least that I could find -- about her credentials. thanks
I agree with pretty much your entire post on Constitutional grounds, Wukky... I know that you have a good grasp on how things should be, according to the Constitution.
Likewise, you're assessment of the "court of public opinion" is right in line with mine... But both of us being realists allows us to KNOW that your assessment is not based in how things are, but how things ought to be. Surely you can discern the difference.
It could be argued that Mr. Soetoro, with his failure to abolish the "patriot" act, should be held to the same standards that ALL Americans are.
Although the fourth amendment affords US citizens the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures... We, the People of the United States know that this simply is an illusion as long as the "patriot" act exisits.
Why should Mr. Soetoro be afforded immunity from the blatant violation of the Constitution that the "patriot" act provides for, when you or I would certainly NOT be given the same consideration?
Why is this man above the what has sadly become the ruling "law" of the land?
You hit the nail on the head: This man is the finest and most reliable tool the moneyed elite that truly run this country have had.
I'm a realist, just like you. I know the score...
I'm sorry I "led" you into this. It has served a purpose though, hopefully...
Now some readers of our little discourse may be asking themselves the same questions, and peering over the edge of the rabbit hole.
Be careful folks... It's way deeper than you can imagine.