It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by necati
Am I wrong or is this again one of those postings trying to arouse the impression that I don’t know what I’m talking of.
Originally posted by necati
All the parameters for animating the spheres (particles) like gravity, air resistance, turbulence field, birth rate, lifespan etc can be found within the above mentioned program. The odds that this is a mere coincidence are astronomical.
Originally posted by free_spirit
Just remember CGI? No way. But if you insist then PROVE IT !!
There are much easier ways to fake something like this than any after effects plug-in. So I very much doubt it.
If you're not going to listen to anybody who has many years (some of us over a decade) of experience actually creating such systems, then there is little point in any of us trying to answer you further.
Maybe Josué has ignored your messages because you don't have credentials, simple. But just be patient, I've been informed that Josué Hernandez is gonna be invited to the tv show to talk about his recreation and the Pedro Hernandez UFO footage, in fact the intention is to present the two of them talking about this sighting and wait, it will surprise you. Stay tuned.
By the way I see you quoted me with I think my first post in this historic thread. Learning something from me perhaps?
A word of advice for free; Beware with the CGI syndrome, you may end believing your own shadow is a CGI illusion, or your own reflection in a mirror. Just remember CGI? No way. But if you insist then PROVE IT !!
Originally posted by necati
If you wouldn’t have omitted the link which follows the above quote you perhaps would have understood that I didn’t mean the odds for certain parameters/ functions to be available in a plug-in but the fact that they exactly provide everything to have exactly the sphere-ejecting behaviour. I would kindly ask to read it and perhaps a little more about it in the other thread. The ‘thread button’ is a very helpful tool. Your quote should include the last sentence as well
Originally posted by necati
You have also omitted to answer two important crucial questions which would have lent more credence to your judgement:
Originally posted by necati
Could you please let me know what those easier ways are?
Originally posted by necati
Would you create each single sphere separately
Originally posted by necati
and animate it with (again animated) paths?
Originally posted by necati
What a tedious way if you have a particle plug-in at hand
Originally posted by skibtz
Maussan, by not releasing the RAW footage for general consumption, is doing more to
discredit this case than any Ufology-bashing sceptic could ever do.
Originally posted by skibtz
reply to post by free_spirit
The guys with the evidence are asking the people without the evidence to prove it's a
fake.
Twisted!
And then - if you are not known, do not have the credentials, do not have good reason,
are not worthy and/or not in the club - then you get to see nothing.
Twisted!
Some elements of the community are giving Ufology a bad name - in particular those
who refuse to share evidence that could help answer some of mankind's (arguably)
most important questions...
Originally posted by necati
Uhmm, not really……..you might remember that I’ve a rather good memory
I can’t find any sense in such a strange approach to the UFO phenomenon. "Let it
remain unsolved because it would be a splendid mystery."
Originally posted by ArMaP
reply to post by free_spirit
Not really a reply to that post, but maybe this way you will answer me.
Can you answer my questions on
this
post, please? Or at least say you will not answer? As things are I don't know if you
didn't saw them or if you saw them but decided to not answer.
Thanks.
Originally posted by skibtz
reply to post by free_spirit
If there is a chance that the videos are CGI then having the raw data could help resolve that issue.
It would also help to determine how the events unfolded without prejudice.
Personally, I am with the balloon/kite concept and the raw video could help resolve that line of enquiry.
By not releasing the raw data, the owners are ensuring that only carefully selected
investigators/researchers (cohorts?) get to examine the raw data and provide a
(biased?) opinion.
The longer they refuse access to the raw data the longer the case may go on.
Not a problem though as Maussan and Co. are getting some great publicity in the
process
Don't get me wrong, I am happy to sit by and wait for this to unfold in it's own time - it
is not my integrity on the line at the end of the day...
And for all I know, you may well be Jaime Maussan!!
[edit on 6/9/2009 by skibtz]