It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by skibtz
Originally posted by DaMod
My note here is, how many Mexican computer programmers do you know? Would a guy that rides a bus in Mexico be one of those guys? Wouldn't a programmer in Mexico be pretty sought after? Wouldn't he make a better comparable living? If it was me shooting this footage with no skill in CGI at all, wouldn't you still claim it to be cgi?
Major Cop Out...
Major generalistion of Mexicans more like - shame on you for perpetuating such ignorance!
Originally posted by DaMod
No no no no... and you spelled generalization wrong.
I'm not generalizing mexicans other than...
Originally posted by skibtz
Originally posted by DaMod
No no no no... and you spelled generalization wrong.
It was a typo (I dropped the 'a' - please forgive me!) and it is spelt 'generalisation' - check my avatar - I'm from the UK, we do things different here. Is that ok? I have a feeling that it won't be...
I'm not generalizing mexicans other than...
Keep digging...
Originally posted by DGFenrir
reply to post by DaMod
Or you're just refusing to believe that this can be CGI.
Nowadays we have special programs for adding effects to videos. The user only has to choose what kind of effects he wants. It's even easier than riding a bike.
And no there is no evidence of neither. We can't prove it to be CGI because the only way to do it on this site is to have the origina video which we don't have and will not have.
By the end of the day aliens haven't been proven and all we have is hundreds of videos with unidentified objects in them or obvious/not-so-obvious CGI.
Originally posted by DaMod
As a poster said before in response to me that it is a piece of cake. I say, if I went into one of these programs my dots would look like &*^*. My main point is people are giving too much credit to this guy, and using an explanation that is too easy to get away with. I mean no one here can prove it's cgi. Their cgi claim holds just as much water as this is an alien craft claim because there is an equal amount of evidence for both... none at all. That is why it is a cop out. If this is not CGI then how do you explain it?
Sure the program might be easy to obtain and simple to use, but how simple is getting the graphic to match the zoom / blur of the footage at the exact right time? Then how hard would it be to get the objects being released to flow exactly right to match what the creator is really trying to portray.
I think it would be best if instead of making a claim like this, some ATS cgi artist tried to duplicate the effect. That would be a little more convincing to a lot of people than just pointing fingers and calling out CGI!
When I say duplicate, I mean match it and make it good!
[edit on 6-7-2009 by DaMod]
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by liquidsmoke206
but where's Phage, ATS's most overrated debunker, to tell us that this is nothing more than a plastic bag blowing in the wind?
Well we are on page 7 and the usual list of debunkers have not yet swooped in on this. Normally you will see the regulars on page one but at least by page two..
The fact that NONE of them have offered an opinion is extremely telling.
Debunkers rarely tackle something they cannot explain... at least not until they work out a game plan
Originally posted by DGFenrir
reply to post by DaMod
There is no need for any skill or knowledge to do a video like this. You only have to take the video clip, get it on your pc, open the program, add a few dots, assign them movement trajectories, add blur/grain and you're done.
Edit:
It's not rocket science.
[edit on 6/7/2009 by DGFenrir]
Originally posted by badw0lf
Originally posted by DGFenrir
reply to post by DaMod
There is no need for any skill or knowledge to do a video like this. You only have to take the video clip, get it on your pc, open the program, add a few dots, assign them movement trajectories, add blur/grain and you're done.
Edit:
It's not rocket science.
[edit on 6/7/2009 by DGFenrir]
Off you go then, find some random scenery footage and do this. Add a few dots, apply a trajectory to it and ... wow us all.
And unless it perfectly matches how this footage is, then you fail.
Now, I also believe it is quite possible that it is CGI. BUT I would not be so cocky in stating how 'easy' it is, and you're really making yourself out to be an arrogant member of the forums by your continual snide contributions.
I know I could pull something similar to this off in After Effects, using the provided plugins that come with it, having done similar when attempting to learn the application via tutorials. I also know that anything I did produce would certainly not stand up to scrutiny at the hands of people directly opposed to your view, and as such will refrain from doing so.
BUT for someone to sit there, not offer anything by way of example and claim that no skill would be involved whatsoever, is absolutely ignorant in the basics of how these things work.
So, you claim the ease of which this can be done, show us. Or your claims are moot.
Originally posted by badw0lf
Originally posted by DGFenrir
reply to post by DaMod
There is no need for any skill or knowledge to do a video like this. You only have to take the video clip, get it on your pc, open the program, add a few dots, assign them movement trajectories, add blur/grain and you're done.
Edit:
It's not rocket science.
[edit on 6/7/2009 by DGFenrir]
Off you go then, find some random scenery footage and do this. Add a few dots, apply a trajectory to it and ... wow us all.
And unless it perfectly matches how this footage is, then you fail.
Now, I also believe it is quite possible that it is CGI. BUT I would not be so cocky in stating how 'easy' it is, and you're really making yourself out to be an arrogant member of the forums by your continual snide contributions.
I know I could pull something similar to this off in After Effects, using the provided plugins that come with it, having done similar when attempting to learn the application via tutorials. I also know that anything I did produce would certainly not stand up to scrutiny at the hands of people directly opposed to your view, and as such will refrain from doing so.
BUT for someone to sit there, not offer anything by way of example and claim that no skill would be involved whatsoever, is absolutely ignorant in the basics of how these things work.
So, you claim the ease of which this can be done, show us. Or your claims are moot.