It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I'm not complaining, since name-calling and motives-impugning is a sure sign of argumentative bankruptcy.
Demonstrating a pattern of inaccuracy of a person's claims
He claims he saved the space shuttle program from a fatal design flaw by relaying a telepathic warning from space aliens.
Originally posted by JimOberg
Here's a long give-and-take over STS-63 with intelligent and persistent believer Ed Lopez, whose arguments actually help clarify the dispute.
Discussion of STS-63 video:
www.jamesoberg.com...
Originally posted by Zelong
reply to post by secretnasaman
(any translation would really help from our Russian ATS members)
G'day secretnasaman,I've noticed a reply on one of your utube channel uploads regarding translation of STS-63 UFO seen by NASA & Russian cameras:UNCUT
by- utubin67
Translation:Russ Mission Ctrl: Do you see that light? Russ Astronauts: Yes, and I've seen it before.... My wife says all the rest of the Russian talk is NOT related to any UFO's it more like 'how are guys feeling up there" "we are feeling good" etc.. and there is talk about the 'distance of things not ufo" in "meters" etc.. I thought for sure the Russian Astronauts were talking about a ufo turns out they're having small talk, it does reveal how our imaginations can run wild..
Zelong.
Originally posted by The Shrike
The only way we, or at least I, could possibly get any satisfaction is to sit side by side and watch THE NASA TRANSMISSIONS tape so I can hear your explanations because we've never addressed specific footage and you might have never watched the tape for all I know.
Originally posted by Jocko Flocko
reply to post by easynow
Not only that easynow, he has a visible pattern on these forums of picking and choosing incidents, topics and evidence to debate. People ask him for a scientific explanation about something and he totally avoids the questions. Jim could in the very least regurgitate some of NASA's explanations over the years, then at least this tactic wouldn't look so blatantly obvious to everyone.
Originally posted by Zelong
reply to post by JimOberg
He claims he saved the space shuttle program from a fatal design flaw by relaying a telepathic warning from space aliens.
G'day JimOberg,would you have a link to these claims from Gordon Cooper as I do look further into such claims for a link that maybe there.People talk of Guardian Angles telling them things in picture form or thought/telepathic etc...
Originally posted by JimOberg
Originally posted by The Shrike
The only way we, or at least I, could possibly get any satisfaction is to sit side by side and watch THE NASA TRANSMISSIONS tape so I can hear your explanations because we've never addressed specific footage and you might have never watched the tape for all I know.
I have extensive detailed critiques of that particular tape. Is this the proper forum to post them, they are not directly STS-63 related.
That's the tape that claims Scott Carpenter is alleged to have said that NASA thought John Glenn's fireflies were living critters, isn't it?
Originally posted by chunder
reply to post by JimOberg
Can you please explain the point of your post ?
Second line - I once saw a UFO and then lied on my tax return, does this exclude me from jury duty ?
Originally posted by Zelong
reply to post by JimOberg
Thanks JimOberg,for the book info.
These words ring true "She made a point always to document the details as soon as possible, usually typing up the complete messages".
Originally posted by The Shrike
reply to post by Exuberant1
Has anyone said that the object that is zoomed into could be Saturn? First the zoom in and the image is a blurry white "orb." Then when zoom out occurs and the distant object is more in focus, I see "rings" as around Saturn. When the zoom in occurs, a focusing effort is not seen as they don't quite bring the image into proper focus. Only when they zoom out is the image clearer or in better focus and that's when you see the "rings." I don't think it's a UFO with Saturn-like rings, I think it's the planet.
but not because of the ringlike image. That's a common camera artifact for point sources of any origin.
Originally posted by The Shrike
reply to post by JimOberg
but not because of the ringlike image. That's a common camera artifact for point sources of any origin.
I've been a (amateur) photographer since 1955. I've never seen that effect before. I'm aware of optical effects caused by shutter mechanisms as shown on TV documentaries to explain some diamond-shaped UFOs. IMO, the image shown on the video does not suffer from that malady.
BUT, I could be wrong.