It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
No. The image, not a copy of another image.
. . .jesus is an image of his father. . .
God is not a person.
. . .the believe that jesus and GOD are the same person.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
In John 10:18 Jesus says he has the power to take up his life. to quote, "I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again."
Acts 2:24 says that death was not able to hold him.
Is this all meaningless? Was Jesus just running his mouth about some gobbledygook? Was it a parable and did not have a practical application?
Or an infinite God all of a sudden is not infinite because there is this one thing he can not possibly do?
What book is that from, the Handbook for Being a God? There is no other image that Jesus is a copy of. Here is another one of my untrue hypothetical questions. If God had any image, why would God need a Son?
see jesus, then you can see god.
then what is jesus?
How long have I been "stuck"? Not very. Years ago, my best friends were JW and I considered myself an Arian. A year ago I was saying there was no Jesus before the incarnation. I still believe that but now realize there was something else that did, that somehow became Jesus.
jesus is not an infinite god. listen to yourself. you are so stuck on jesus being an eternal, immortal, almighty god that your not even realizing that there is no difference between what you are saying and what the nicea council concluded on.
you are teaching that jesus and god are different sides of the same coin.
thats not what the bible teaches.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by miriam0566
What book is that from, the Handbook for Being a God? There is no other image that Jesus is a copy of. Here is another one of my untrue hypothetical questions. If God had any image, why would God need a Son?
see jesus, then you can see god.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
My thought is God, the Father has no substance and what appeared to be substance was the pre-incarnation Son. He really was not anywhere near a substance until Jesus. The Father is not a person, per se, but the Son became a person, for our benefit.
and yet there is no scripture to support that theory
Originally posted by jmdewey60
and yet there is no scripture to support that theory
Show me the verse that says God is a person.
Making God out as a substance is the foundation of pantheism.
This is not an exact science and I am kind of fishing for words to fit. If reflect works for you, I am not going to debate it.
Jesus reflects god's personal qualities, he doesnt "translate" them for us.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by Xcouncil=wisdom
Of course. Where do you think the JW's ripped it off? From the Seventh Day Adventists. (I might add, along with every other part of the JW religion that is decent)
Are you aware of "the archangel"?
Originally posted by jmdewey60
Let's say you have an ordinary church that does not pretend to be prophetic. If they have a comment that they want to discuss, about a prophecy, they can put an article in the church's publication. They can drag out a professor from a church owned university and write it. He can put his name on it and say, this is what I think.
With the JW, they maintain this almost mystical curtain around them selves to where you do not even know who the Watchtower Society is.
There is this air about it as if you are being handed down from on high some authoritative prophecy, or some thing, to the point that their publication has to be taken as the gospel.
So that kind of paints them in a corner as far as having any flexibility of movement in just plain thought.
Can you write a letter to the editor and ask what the hell they were thinking, without being in fear of loosing your membership?
Maybe I have the wrong impression, but that is what I get.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
As for the truth, the SDA church does not claim to have all the truth, right at this moment. Maybe the JW's think they have it carved in stone, so no need to discuss it because any further light will be rejected out of hand.
I guess it depends on your personality. If you like the assurance that everything is all figured out, then join up. I do not think that is the case, so I feel more comfortable in a church where new understanding will at least be listened to.
In this case, Christianity should pack it up, and all the churches close their doors. Everything that supposedly supports Christianity in the Old Testament is pulling out the secrets. (making things up)
the problem arises when the simple truth isnt good enough. there has to be some hidden meaning. god has to be more secretive than this. then people just start making things up.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
In this case, Christianity should pack it up an all the churches close their doors. Everything that supposedly supports Christianity in the Old Testament is pulling out the secrets. (making things up)
Or, you can say it is new light. I guess once your catechism of dogma was finished, God turned out the light.