It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What do you expect from a megalomaniac? the guy stopped serving God and began serving himself long ago.Robertson really thinks if there is a haven you are gonna need his little seal of approval on your @$$.Typical fundamentalist.
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
reply to post by jsobecky
Absolutely not. It is a valid question. If you cannot answer it, that's OK, but it is still a valid question.
No, it is not a valid question.
Pat thinks the Bible says homosexual marriage is wrong. Bible never said that.
It stops right there. If you have proof that homosexual marriage will lead to child abuse, bring it here. I have not seen it anywhere in this thread.
This is the point you dont get. Right now the law says marriage is between a man and a woman over the age of 18(though some states are a little more flexible on age.) So once you redifine it to include same sex couples then it can be defined as anything. You only think it should be limited to in your own words "BETWEEN two 18 years old consenting adults." It doesnt have to be defined as that. What makes your definition of "BETWEEN two 18 years old consenting adults" the right one. Why couldnt it just as correctly be between any group of people that are over 18 and consent. Plus, under your own limited definition, a man could marry his mother, sister, aunt, cousing, uncle, dad, etc as long as everyone involved is over 18 and they both consent?
t. Problem is we are in unprecedented times so only time will tell.
who would have thought 20 or 30 years ago that it would be acceptable much less legal to be a homosexual?
He said that the Bible says homosexuality itself is deviant.
Thus you cannot legitimize a deviance by incorporating it into marriage.
You are looking for something he did not say. He said that he is against gay marriage because the Bible said that homosexuality is wrong.
Pat Robertson: Gay marriage 'beginning in a long downward slide' to legalized child molestation.
He then expanded that to include bestiality and child abuse, which are also wrong under the Bible.
He then said if you remove the Biblical arguments from the discussion, what do you have left?
That is all the time I will spend on PR. I am not defending his position. I am merely clarifying it for those with sound-bite listening habits.
And your assertion that the Bible supports homosexuality are absurd.
I see that you cannot answer the question I asked earlier. That's OK, too.
Looking past that though, it is pretty clear that it would lead to polygamy at the very least,
I can see incest possibly happening too though
A good point Deaf Alien Robertson does walk a fine line when it comes to free speech.I just think it's sad that a lot of people take Robertson's word as literally being the "word of god" it's funny how when some fanatic goes on shooting spree he's immediately on the air giving the "don't blame me" soundbite.
Pat Robertson: Gay marriage 'beginning in a long downward slide' to legalized child molestation.
Originally posted by Deaf Alien
reply to post by jsobecky
He said that the Bible says homosexuality itself is deviant.
So you admit it's his opinion? Wow. That's a big step.
You are looking for something he did not say. He said that he is against gay marriage because the Bible said that homosexuality is wrong.
WHAT? Did you not read the title?
He then expanded that to include bestiality and child abuse, which are also wrong under the Bible.
Yes, he expanded that, but did not show that by logical progression.
A -> B -> C
That is all the time I will spend on PR. I am not defending his position. I am merely clarifying it for those with sound-bite listening habits.
Then why are you defending this idiot? People like Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell are what make this world a very, very dangerous world.
I see that you cannot answer the question I asked earlier. That's OK, too.
Already answered. Not a valid question. A strawman argument.