It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by leaualorin
Originally posted by organism315
reply to post by AlwaysQuestion
Exactly right. It will only be visible to the very southern tips of South Africa, South America, Antarctica, and southern Australia for at least another year. Then in 2010, it will be visible up to the equator. 2011, it will be visible to everyone except the extreme northern regions (of course, it will be within the orbit of mars, at that point, and accelerating around the Sun, so we'll be in some really hard times. By 2012, we should have serious earthquakes, tidal waves, and asteroid impacts of the rocks it towed in from the Oort cloud and Kuyper belt.
with grace in liberty by justice,
O-315
I can confirm that about 4 days ago I HAVE SEEN A "SECOND SUN" to the right of the REAL SUN , and it stayed there about half an hour I think! I noticed it kind of late , but it was truly amazing! I called two of my collegues to see for them selves BECAUSE I COULD NOT BELIEVE MY EYES! I NEVER SAW SOMETHING LIKE THIS IN THE SKY!!!
We were so astonished that we just stared at it until it dissapeard from the sky ; in the final stage it turned kind of violet and the next minutes IT WAS NO MORE!
We did not took a single photo although we all 3 had a 5 mp phone in the pockets...
really frustrating now that I think of it...
BUT IT WAS THERE , IT WAS REAL , I REALLY COULD NOT BELIEVE IT , AND THIS IS THE ONLY REASON I STARTED SEARCHING THE NET FOR SOME KIND OF INFO / CREATED THIS ACCOUNT , AND THE USER ABOVE IS UNBELIEVABLE RIGHT AND EXACT IN DESCRIPTION!!!
It was observed and by others and one is in this topic here : www.disclose.tv...
i53.tinypic.com...
He actually took a photo and to my amaze it was exactly what i too saw!
There are others that probably saw it but it's been overlooked and IGNORED!
I was one of those that had a real laugh at the BS with 2012 , mayans and etc...
This thing that I saw BY PURE CHANCE , MISTAKE , LUCK you may call it what you whant , really made me think "a little bit more " about the information I previously had read on various sites about 2012 ...
If it really is true or not , remains to be seen , but hey : WHAT A VIEW , WITH 2 SUNS IN THE SKY!!
AND IT WAS IN A VERY CLEAR (CLOUDLESS ) PART OF THE SKY!
Truly an "eye-opener" that day for me!
Well this is what I had to say!
I hope for the best for all of you that believe in this "planet x thing" !
Good day to all!edit on 28-1-2011 by leaualorin because: forgot to complete the message with a link
Originally posted by stereologist
The photo looks like it was shot through a window. Did you see this through a window? Your description makes it sound like you were inside looking at this scene.
...the fact that someone else saw it in another part of the world...
I mean , all someone in their right minds can do is just take a telescope , go in a non-chemtrailed area , with a clear sky at night , and SEE WITH THEIR OWN EYES THE REALITY!
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by leaualorin
The photo was definitely taken through a window., What you are seeing is an internal reflection inside of the glass. That photo was been discussed in various threads at ATS.
1.What you saw is much more interesting and an atmospheric effect. We know that because of the color change and the fact that the "sun" disappeared.
1. I hope so! If "this sun" is the same thing as ancient civilization left word for us , well then WE'RE IN DEEP SH*T! taking in account what happend last time this "thing" past around earth! ).
2.There is no second sun around our Sun. If there was, where is it today? Amateur astronomers would easily see this with their scopes. The question of course is what did you see?
2.Considering earth's orbit , and other "relative things" , I HAVE NO IDEEA WHERE IS IT! What I saw that day was indeed strange , and above all, it looked like the planet with "wings" about wich A LOT of ancient civilizations talk about! But... who knows for sure?!
3.I suspect that you saw an interesting form of a sun dog. Not all sun dogs are seen close to the horizon. Some can appear well above the horizon. I have seen sun dogs so bright that it hurt to look at them. Some are dim and hard to detect. Some have vibrant rainbow colors and others are the color of the sun. Here is a link to sun dogs.
3. Nope , it didn't looked like that! We romanians , had something like that THIS YEAR in Constanta near the sea! THAT ONE GOT FILMED BY AN AMATEUR! :-) . Guess we'll have to wait and see what's what and that's all we can do! (besides taking a telescope , lots of pizza's , gas money and a very clear sky to STARE AT! :-)
Sun dogs
Look through this site to see many interesting examples of atmospheric phenomenon. Remember that these photos are the best of images. I have seen many of these sites, but incomplete cloud cover can make for fragmentary views of these phenomena.
...the fact that someone else saw it in another part of the world...
Actually, these are completely separate issues. They are only slightly similar. The only similarity is that the images were earthbound, not a new sun.
I mean , all someone in their right minds can do is just take a telescope , go in a non-chemtrailed area , with a clear sky at night , and SEE WITH THEIR OWN EYES THE REALITY!
Your are quite correct in that anyone can check this out for themselves. What people do not see is a new sun. It's not there. Thousands of amateur astronomers around the world would notice.
Originally posted by stereologist
The photo looks like it was shot through a window. Did you see this through a window? Your description makes it sound like you were inside looking at this scene.
I hope so! If "this sun" is the same thing as ancient civilization left word for us , well then WE'RE IN DEEP SH*T! taking in account what happend last time this "thing" past around earth! ).
Considering earth's orbit , and other "relative things" , I HAVE NO IDEEA WHERE IS IT! What I saw that day was indeed strange , and above all, it looked like the planet with "wings" about wich A LOT of ancient civilizations talk about! But... who knows for sure?!
Nope , it didn't looked like that! We romanians , had something like that THIS YEAR in Constanta near the sea! THAT ONE GOT FILMED BY AN AMATEUR! :-) . Guess we'll have to wait and see what's what and that's all we can do! (besides taking a telescope , lots of pizza's , gas money and a very clear sky to STARE AT! :-)
Hey "stereologist" , does your name , or a part of it comes form LOGISTIC?
someone from this forum told me you are "a government dis info agent" ! Is that so?
Stop trying to cover things up! You'll become a mess! spiritually speaking!
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by leaualorin
Hey "stereologist" , does your name , or a part of it comes form LOGISTIC?
No.
someone from this forum told me you are "a government dis info agent" ! Is that so?
No.
Stop trying to cover things up! You'll become a mess! spiritually speaking!
The evidence is very clear, there is no second sun. If there were a second sun, then where is it? Why don't the billions of people on this planet see it? The answer is simple. There is no second sun.
By the way : you speak really blunt!
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by leaualorin
First off, NASA never ever stated that a new planet was discovered in the 1980s. If you disagree please show me where you go this notion.
The only SHAMELESS ones I know of are the liars on websites that make this really asinine lie.
As far as NASA getting other groups interested in space ... weel they are. The privatization of space is an important issue with a number of companies formed to do exactly that. There are going to be private launches for satellites and passengers.
By the way : you speak really blunt!
This came from a post that did not mince words, right?
does this "satisfies" you , or this is still not enough?
So mysterious is the object that astronomers do not know if it is a planet, a giant comet, a
nearby "protostar" that never got hot enough to become a star, a distant galaxy so young that
it is still in the process of forming its first stars or a galaxy so shrouded in dust that none of the light cast by its stars ever gets through.
The 10th Planet, called 'X', reflecting the Roman numeral for the number 10,
moved in a 3,600 years elliptical orbit around our sun. Planet X is 4 to 5 times the size of earth and 100 times as dense.
The mass of Planet X, like the earth's moon, will cause massive tide fluctuations as it nears the earth when whipping around the Sun, it is also speculated that the magnetic pull of Planet X will cause the earth's magnetic poles to shift.
It will also case huge solar flares as it nears the sun.
The last time it passed the sun was approximately 1600 BC, putting it squarely in the timeframe of Noah's Flood.
Immediately after NASA's announcement, the discovery of Planet X was silenced and the cover-up began.
Apparently official estimates are that seventy to ninety percent of the mankind and animals on earth will perish.
All category 2 and 3 telescopes in the observatories have apparently been unavailable to the public since May of 2003. Category 4 scopes have a one to two year waiting list to schedule time.
... orbiting in a moderately eccentric orbit with a major axis of 2.8 light-years.
A potentially viable Newtonian candidate would be a trans-Plutonian massive object (Planet X/Nemesis/Tyche) since it, actually, would affect e with a non-vanishing long-term variation. On the other hand, the values for the physical and orbital parameters of such a hypothetical body required to obtain the right order of magnitude for de/dt are completely unrealistic. Moreover, they are in neat disagreement with both the most recent theoretical scenarios envisaging the existence of a distant, planetary-sized body and with the model-independent constraints on them dynamically inferred from planetary motions. Thus, the issue of finding a satisfactorily explanation for the anomalous behavior of the Moon's eccentricity remains open.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by weathergirl78
The first 3 articles you linked to discuss the evidence for Nemesis, a distant object that has an orbit taking millions of years to complete. As the abstract of the third link states:
... orbiting in a moderately eccentric orbit with a major axis of 2.8 light-years.
Such an object has to be more massive than a planet and more on the order of a small star, over 60 Jupiter masses.
As can be seen from the articles the extinction and crater date evidence is not clear enough to determine the period for this hypothesized object.
From the 5th link the abstract states
A potentially viable Newtonian candidate would be a trans-Plutonian massive object (Planet X/Nemesis/Tyche) since it, actually, would affect e with a non-vanishing long-term variation. On the other hand, the values for the physical and orbital parameters of such a hypothetical body required to obtain the right order of magnitude for de/dt are completely unrealistic. Moreover, they are in neat disagreement with both the most recent theoretical scenarios envisaging the existence of a distant, planetary-sized body and with the model-independent constraints on them dynamically inferred from planetary motions. Thus, the issue of finding a satisfactorily explanation for the anomalous behavior of the Moon's eccentricity remains open.
It's quite interesting that Tyche is mentioned. This is described in the following article.
Persistent Evidence of a Jovian Mass Solar Companion in the Oort Cloud
This supposes a large mass that is very far away. As noted supposing that such a mass exists runs into other issues.
The last link is to a planet that is around another star. This was the interesting planet that orbits the "opposite" direction around its host star.
WASP-17b
Thanks. Those are very interesting links. What this shows is that the search for a new planet has gone far out from the inner part of our solar system where the known planets orbit. A number of methods are being employed to suggest just where astronomers can look for a new large mass in our solar system.