It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ScRuFFy63It does make sense or it wouldn't happen so often. You already know how conspiracy theorists are viewed. So you come to a conspiracy theorist haven and ask them questions you know they cannot answer. Do you know what happens when you corner a strange animal? They usually attack.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Originally posted by ScRuFFy63It does make sense or it wouldn't happen so often. You already know how conspiracy theorists are viewed. So you come to a conspiracy theorist haven and ask them questions you know they cannot answer. Do you know what happens when you corner a strange animal? They usually attack.
It doesn't make sense just because it happens "so often". That's just weird.
I thought attacks were against forum rules. I guess Animal House rules apply?
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Asking "what evidence do you have for that" is "cornering" someone? Really? It's just a question.
I said "Animal House".
That is rather strange. Defending oneself from attacks I can see. Defending oneself from inquiries is just odd. It would imply that people don't have evidence.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Which is rather my point, actually. I know dissenting voices are always at risk of being "disappeared". Almost as if there was a conspiracy to stifle opposing views. Or am I just being paranoid?
Originally posted by ScRuFFy63
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Which is rather my point, actually. I know dissenting voices are always at risk of being "disappeared". Almost as if there was a conspiracy to stifle opposing views. Or am I just being paranoid?
Well this is a conspiracy based web site... That like going to a church and preaching about atheism. Would you expect open arms in that scenario?
Originally posted by Malcram
reply to post by Gawdzilla
I'd love to discuss evidence. Maybe you can tell what evidence you have to justify your support of the claim that, for a "100%" fact, ETs more advanced than us 'DO NOT EXIST"?
I'd like to discuss your evidence for this so called "truth"?
[edit on 18-4-2009 by Malcram]
Originally posted by Malcram
reply to post by Gawdzilla
LOL I linked to it yesterday and you accused me of not providing evidence because I didn't cut and paste, today you insist on links not on cutting and pasting. You are incredibly inconsistent.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Originally posted by Malcram
reply to post by Gawdzilla
LOL I linked to it yesterday and you accused me of not providing evidence because I didn't cut and paste, today you insist on links not on cutting and pasting. You are incredibly inconsistent.
A link please. That's all I'm asking.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Never expected "open arms", but hoped for "open minds". Seems I was wrong. Nobody wants to talk about evidence, and there's probably a reason for that, isn't there?
Originally posted by ScRuFFy63
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
Never expected "open arms", but hoped for "open minds". Seems I was wrong. Nobody wants to talk about evidence, and there's probably a reason for that, isn't there?
I can't believe you're asking me about the evidence of others. I can only speak for myself.
You lead me to believe you have some other agenda than a search for truth. I mean you're on a conspiracy site constantly demanding evidence. If you have any kind of intelligence, which you appear to, you should know that will only cause problems. So why would you want to stir up trouble all the time?
Originally posted by Malcram
reply to post by Gawdzilla
I've asked you repeatedly for evidence for the claims you defend and all you do is evade. Physician, heal thyself!
Originally posted by Skyfloating
reply to post by Gawdzilla
The problem is not in asking for evidence. UFOlogy is overflowing with evidence. I could spontaneously drag up a few hundred threads containing evidence which has not been explained by conventional means.
The problem starts when you say: "Thats not evidence" and "There is no evidence"....in light of evidence.
Originally posted by Gawdzilla
So, asking "what evidence do you have for that" is a stupid thing on a conspiracy site? Ipso facto, there's no evidence to be had?