It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Astyanax
Bravo, Modern Academia. You really have brought them out of the woodwork, haven't you?
I understand and agree entirely with what you are saying. Others seem to have comprehension poblems, so I'll repeat the logic of your OP in the bluntest terms possible and hope it helps them get it.
- North America was not empty when it was first settled by white Europeans. It was already popluated by native folk, whom the European settlers, an ignorant lot, called 'Indians'.
- The white European settlers proceed to exterminate the 'Indians' and steal their land. They dispossessed, hunted and massacred 'Indians' till soon there were hardly any left. On the stolen land they then built new countries: Mexico, the United States, Canada.
- Now the descendants of those European ethnic cleansers regard those countries as their own and go to great lengths to discourage or prevent people from other countries settling in them.
- Bascially, they are pressing a legal title to land their ancestors gained through robbery and genocide. Based on this claim, they also assume a moral high ground vis-à-vis illegal immigrants to which they have no right. It is not their occupation of North America but this assumption of ownership and pretence of morality you disapprove of.
In moral and ethical terms you are completely correct to do so. But human beings are animals - territorial animals - and the claims of morality and humanism fall silent before the stronger voices of instinct and exigency.
LIke you, I am pained by the obscene contradictions inherent in a world where goods and money may move with less hindrance across international borders than people do.
I look forward to the (inevitable, I believe) disappearance of all nation-states and the emergence of a world in which anyone can live wherever he likes. It will happen, too, in spite of all the spittle-flecked right-wing vigilantes squatting on the Mexican border like toads, cheeks stuffed with Oreos, automatic rifles at the ready, their hoglike buttocks obscenely overflowing their folding chairs.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
reply to post by jfj123
Okay, let me try to sum up some additional things i've said
In an ideal world you should be able to go wherever your feet takes you.
Secondly, it is wrong for descendants of invaders to say call other immigrants Immigrants in a derogatory sense. not only is it wrong it makes no sense whatsoever.
And everytime somoeone mentions illegal immigrants they only focus on illegal immigrants in mostly a derogatory sense.
Instead firstly they should not because that's how many are in this country/continent.
And not only that, you can completely bypass bigotry by being more logical and only focusing on govt. not increasing border security. Wouldn't that make more sense?
Imagine completely bypassing derogatory statements AND tackling the issue more intelligently at the same time! Wouldn't that be great, how come nobody is doing that?
How come so many are calling me racists when others here are saying things like "3rd world fools, having 9 babies all of them" or this or that.
So if you remember that the origins of America as YOU know it is all about immigrants then perhaps you wouldn't speak of them so badly.
Originally posted by stevegmu
Well, my grandparents on my father's side came here legally from Ireland
and Germany, while my mother is Sicilian. Just one exception proves your statement incorrect.
Actually, the original settlers in N. America either came here looking for riches or freedom from religious persecution.
Originally posted by jfj123
So let me ask you this. How would you like to handle the current illegal immigrant situation?
Would you allow ANYONE into the country that wants to enter? If not, why not?
The difference is in the legality and the things endured by doing things the right way, and doing things the wrong way. sneaking into a country and not subjecting yourself to the pros AND cons of that country is the wrong way.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Secondly, it is wrong for descendants of invaders to say call other immigrants Immigrants in a derogatory sense. not only is it wrong it makes no sense whatsoever.
And everytime somoeone mentions illegal immigrants they only focus on illegal immigrants in mostly a derogatory sense.
Instead firstly they should not because that's how many are in this country/continent.
Where is the bigotry in saying illegal immigrants don't belong here? WHERE?
And not only that, you can completely bypass bigotry by being more logical and only focusing on govt. not increasing border security. Wouldn't that make more sense?
Imagine completely bypassing derogatory statements AND tackling the issue more intelligently at the same time! Wouldn't that be great, how come nobody is doing that?
Two wrongs don't make a right and suggesting that one specific group of people can or cannot do this is a form of racist thinking.
How come so many are calling me racists when others here are saying things like "3rd world fools, having 9 babies all of them" or this or that.
So if you remember that the origins of America as YOU know it is all about immigrants then perhaps you wouldn't speak of them so badly.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by Astyanax
I look forward to the (inevitable, I believe) disappearance of all nation-states and the emergence of a world in which anyone can live wherever he likes. It will happen, too, in spite of all the spittle-flecked right-wing vigilantes squatting on the Mexican border like toads, cheeks stuffed with Oreos, automatic rifles at the ready, their hoglike buttocks obscenely overflowing their folding chairs.
Again let me quote this excellent post.
Sums up my feelings excellently!
You should all read his post and learn from it if not from me.
www.manhattan-institute.org...
Since the mid-1960s, America has welcomed nearly 30 million legal immigrants and received perhaps another 15 million illegal immigrants, numbers unprecedented in our history. These immigrants have picked our fruit, cleaned our homes, cut our grass, worked in our factories and washed our cars. But they have also crowded into our hospital emergency rooms, schools and government-subsidized aid programs, sparking a fierce debate about their contributions and costs.
www.manhattan-institute.org...
America does not have a vast labor shortage that requires waves of low-wage immigrants; in fact, unemployment among unskilled workers is high -- about 30 percent. Like Velasquez, many of the unskilled, uneducated workers now journeying here labor in shrinking industries, where they force out native workers, and many others work in industries in which cheap labor has led businesses to suspend investment in new technologies that would make them less labor-intensive. These workers come at great cost. Increasing numbers of them arrive with little education and none of the skills necessary to succeed in a modern economy. Many may wind up stuck on our lowest economic rungs, where they will rely on something that immigrants of other generations didn't have: a vast U.S. welfare and social- services apparatus that has enormously amplified the cost of immigration. Just as welfare reform and other policies are helping to shrink America's underclass by weaning people off such social programs, we are importing a new, foreign-born underclass. As famed free-market economist Milton Friedman puts it: "It's just obvious that you can't have free immigration and a welfare state."
Originally posted by Astyanax
Bravo, Modern Academia. You really have brought them out of the woodwork, haven't you?
I understand and agree entirely with what you are saying. Others seem to have comprehension poblems, so I'll repeat the logic of your OP in the bluntest terms possible and hope it helps them get it.
- North America was not empty when it was first settled by white Europeans. It was already popluated by native folk, whom the European settlers, an ignorant lot, called 'Indians'.
The white European settlers proceed to exterminate the 'Indians' and steal their land. They dispossessed, hunted and massacred 'Indians' till soon there were hardly any left. On the stolen land they then built new countries: Mexico, the United States, Canada.
Now the descendants of those European ethnic cleansers regard those countries as their own and go to great lengths to discourage or prevent people from other countries settling in them.
Bascially, they are pressing a legal title to land their ancestors gained through robbery and genocide. Based on this claim, they also assume a moral high ground vis-à-vis illegal immigrants to which they have no right. It is not their occupation of North America but this assumption of ownership and pretence of morality you disapprove of.
In moral and ethical terms you are completely correct to do so. But human beings are animals - territorial animals - and the claims of morality and humanism fall silent before the stronger voices of instinct and exigency.
I look forward to the (inevitable, I believe) disappearance of all nation-states and the emergence of a world in which anyone can live wherever he likes. It will happen, too, in spite of all the spittle-flecked right-wing vigilantes squatting on the Mexican border like toads, cheeks stuffed with Oreos, automatic rifles at the ready, their hoglike buttocks obscenely overflowing their folding chairs.
Originally posted by Skeletal Lamping
Ok, first of all. Question for the OP or whoever can answer... The original colonists were part of a "technologically advanced" society, moved to a new world devoid of cities and buildings etc.
How would they have lived in harmony with the Natives? Yeah they did some pretty horrible stuff, but people are people. The indians weren't saints either. Its called progress, mind you it isn't always a good thing, but inevitable none the less. Are we supposed to live like the dark ages?
Originally posted by Skeletal Lamping
Anyways... getting to the current situation: There isn't enough resources to support millions of leeches who don't pay taxes and expect to be treated like citizens without speaking english. There are certain laws now that weren't in place 300years ago, obviously. If immigrants want to come here and work to make a living, pay taxes like the rest of us, stand in DMV lines, vote, then fine. But if they leech off of society and live in hiding then... idk what to say anymore, this is ridiculous. We don't live in a peaceful holding hands around the earth world. live with it.
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
Originally posted by jfj123
So let me ask you this. How would you like to handle the current illegal immigrant situation?
Would you allow ANYONE into the country that wants to enter? If not, why not?
Ummm
No as mentioned Increased Border Security
You know... the thing no one is talking about?
Originally posted by ModernAcademia
if your parents came here legally then correct me if i'm wrong but you are not a white caucasian.