It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by badmedia
I've never seen or heard of GWB killing anyone either.
You still keep to the same beliefs that religion is founded on. As I have told you before, I think you are a good person and have good intentions, but I think it is in spite of, not because of.
As I told you, the difference is in if they think they are the only one. That because of it, you are able to forgive the sins of people and so on. It is when someone makes themselves into an authoritative figure, because when you do that then you have put yourself above others.
See, when you see the truth and that it is in others, then the commandments make sense. It's like AHHHH, that is why! Treat other people as if they are yourself, because they are you. There is a reason it's called a sin against god when you do these things, because god is within them as well. So when you put yourself above others, then you are not recognizing this. You are not seeing it and so on.
Originally posted by Simplynoone
The word "vicar" means one who serves or acts in place of someone as a representative, and is derived from the word "vicarius."
Do you not believe that as christ is within you that you are also a representative of christ on this earth Badmedia ?
(I am not sticking up for the Pope because I believe he is in error just as you are Badmedia...but I wanted you to see that you prescribe to the same beliefs as the pope does) so you are in fact saying the same thing about yourself as the Pope says ........................
Originally posted by Simplynoone
GW is not a Catholic .(So how can you compare him to the Pope ?) .he is a DOMINIONIST (which is very similar to what you believe) READ UP ON THAT SECT ....they are bringing about a kingdom on this earth which is a physical kingdom brought on by men who will rule the kingdom for God ...who consider themselves christs on earth ..(do some reading ) ..........
(They are also replacement theologists ) which is very similar to the man made doctrine of you are christ men on earth .... .............
He believes that he is christ on earth too ..
So is he wrong in his belief that he is also christ on earth ?
You keep accusing others of the very same thing that your guilty of ..
Have you hated >> ? then you have also killed ..(to hate is to murder) .
You hate the BODY of Christ ...(which you have said in many a post that they are all of satan ) .............that is killing .....
Originally posted by Simplynoone
When you post your thoughts on Christ and you as being as Christ ...and what your beliefs are as one having authority (you push hard that Paul is a false teacher and that most of the bible is not true) ...you are preaching and teaching this idea across the world on ATS ..are you not ?
No difference ..only this is your pulpit ...........
Good point. I'm going with Sir Isaac Newton. After all, the man invented Calculus*. I can't even DO Calculus, so I defer to his vastly superior mathematical ability. *I'm aware Leibnetz also concurrently developed Calculus. (Post half tongue in cheek, but I am in awe of Newtons intellect.)
Originally posted by gotrox
I humbly suggest you read it again.-----Yourself and not by interpretation of various factions. Most cant even agree on pre trib, mid trib, pre wrath pan trib, or post trib, and the whole "rapture" thing wasn't even invented until the 1800's, there is no word "rapture" anywhere in the bible.
All are sinners and all fall short, so the good book says, so where are the other 139000 Jesus's hiding?
How about some notable "rapture" Predictions?
1792 - Shakers calculated this date.
1844 - William Miller predicted Christ would return between March 21, 1843 and March 21, 1844, then revised his prediction, claiming to have miscalculated Scripture, to October 22, 1844. Miller's theology gave rise to the Advent movement.
1977 - William M. Branham predicted that the Rapture would take place in 1977.
1981 - Chuck Smith undogmatically predicted that Jesus would likely return by 1981.
1988 - Publication of 88 Reasons why the Rapture is in 1988, by Edgar C. Whisenant.
1989 - Publication of The final shout: Rapture report 1989, by Edgar Whisenant. More predictions by this author appeared for 1992, 1995, and other years.
1992 - Korean group "Mission for the Coming Days" predicted October 28, 1992 as the date for the rapture.
1993 - Seven years before the year 2000. The rapture would have to start to allow for seven years of the Tribulation before the Return in 2000. Multiple predictions.
1994 - Pastor John Hinkle of Christ Church in Los Angeles predicted June 9, 1994. Radio evangelist Harold Camping predicted September 27, 1994.
2011 - Harold Camping's revised prediction has May 21, 2011 as the date of the rapture.
2060 - Sir Isaac Newton undogmatically proposed, based upon his calculations using figures from the book of Daniel, that the rapture could happen no earlier than 2060.
Though I would never imply insult to anyone's belief system, I figure if someone decides to follow a written doctrine that is finished (I.E. all in the canon without editorials and additions) then you have to follow exactly what is written, and not attempt to interpret according to personal belief or century you reside in.
Just my Dos Pesos.
Originally posted by watcher1960
Good point. I'm going with Sir Isaac Newton. After all, the man invented Calculus*. I can't even DO Calculus, so I defer to his vastly superior mathematical ability. *I'm aware Leibnetz also concurrently developed Calculus. (Post half tongue in cheek, but I am in awe of Newtons intellect.)
Originally posted by gotrox
Originally posted by badmedia
It is implied.
tell me how Jesus would be treated better than how the pope is treated on earth by people?
Originally posted by Simplynoone
I would like for you to show me where the Pope or any other believer has killed anyone recently for not believing as they do ???
And no your not forcing anyone to do anything ..neither is the Pope ..
He is merely stating an opinion and many are following his opinion .
As they will yours too ..
So make sure that what you say is truth ...otherwise you will be held as accountable to God as the Pope will be for what he teaches and or preaches and leads many astray with from his opinion ...
Originally posted by FlyersFan
It is definately NOT implyed that the pope is Christ.
The opposite is DIRECTLY STATED.
That the pope is just a man.
Being treated well is NOT WORSHIP.