It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Jay-in-AR
Tell that to the WW2 soldiers who finally got tired of killing one another and decided to lay down their arms to play soccer on Christmas.
Originally posted by BlueRaja
reply to post by budski
White phosphorus is also a terror weapon.
Well if the goal is extermination, the Israelis aren't being very efficient, but that term sure appeals to emotions. There are varying figures for the actual number of casualties, and their exact makeup, but the fact remains that the vast majority of casualties were combatants.
Here's a few articles to peruse.
I know you'll probably dismiss this stuff as being biased towards Israel, but....are you going to tell me that there's no bias in the Arab media either?
www.imra.org.il...
www.ynetnews.com...
""The number of deceased stands at no more than 500 to 600. Most of them are youths between the ages of 17 to 23 who were recruited to the ranks of Hamas, who sent them to the slaughter," according to the newspaper article. "
uk.reuters.com...
"The adviser said Israel would allow the "maximum" flow of food, medicine, oil and gas to the Gaza Strip to help its 1.5 million residents recover from the offensive, which killed more than 1,300 Palestinians, but a wider range of goods, including steel and cement needed for rebuilding, would have to wait."
"Olmert's adviser said Israel's underlying goal was to deny Hamas control over border crossings that could help it cement its hold on power. "If opening the passages will strengthen Hamas, we won't do it," he said. "
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by dooper
WP is not legal to use in civilian area's - end of story.
Originally posted by dooper
Thank you. This use by Israel does not violate any law, because as long as they were firing at combatants, even in primarily civilian areas, it's not only legal, it's morally correct.
Originally posted by Jay-in-AR
reply to post by dooper
"Visual tracking of identified enemy?"
Weren't you the one that said Israel doesn't know who their enemy is?
I kinda' thought that was what you were arguing, considering Israel is laying to waste everything alive in Gaza.
Originally posted by moniker
I can only guess that their reasoning goes something like this:
Israel allegedly consider all of Gaza a military area. Why? Because Hamas is there (and so is the Israeli military too, now). All of the civilians who were there had no business being in a military area.
Launching rockets by non-uniformed combatants is a war crime too, but you don't seem to get very worked up over that.
You seem to be highly selective in who you criticize.
Originally posted by spearhead
a countries defense force is a tool of the government which in turn is a tool of the people.
when the defense force is acting on its own accord, and using weapons like phosphorus and othe chemical agents it shows that the power has shifted from the people to the government and even more drastically to the defense force itself.
now the defense force can do as it pleases and all in the name of the people.
i agree that the use of chemical weapons is a war crime, but its also a cowards war tactic. if isreal is so tough they should go in and sort their problems out the old way mono e mono.
Girls throw mud. Men throw punches.
Originally posted by budski
reply to post by BlueRaja
Yes it is legal, but ALL the pictures posted in this thread have shown that it was being used against civilians, and for toxic purposes - in other words as a weapon of terror.
The UN and humanitarian organisations complete and total condemnation of Israeli actions makes the position taken by apologists untenable, and completely innapropriate.