It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wotan
I would agree with Operation Mindcrime. I know quite a few Dutch people and they are the most liberal minded people in Europe.
Too many on this forum do NOT understand Socialism or what social policies are. The whole of the EU is socialist in some form or another, but we are still a Democracy. We have elections and we do 'kick-out' our leaders. Our Governments even change to differing political ideologies, but regardless of whether the political power in control is Conservative, Labour, Liberal, Green or Social Democrat, they ALL implement and sustain socialist policies - ie; The Welfare State.
Originally posted by Solomons
Originally posted by Wotan
I would agree with Operation Mindcrime. I know quite a few Dutch people and they are the most liberal minded people in Europe.
Too many on this forum do NOT understand Socialism or what social policies are. The whole of the EU is socialist in some form or another, but we are still a Democracy. We have elections and we do 'kick-out' our leaders. Our Governments even change to differing political ideologies, but regardless of whether the political power in control is Conservative, Labour, Liberal, Green or Social Democrat, they ALL implement and sustain socialist policies - ie; The Welfare State.
Gordon Brown? He just walked right in....literally a dictator no approvement from the people he now has rule over...no better than if any stranger walked in and took office with no say from the public.
[edit on 18-11-2008 by Solomons]
Originally posted by Divinorumus
Yeah, life can be a beach, eh? Many of us have had similar issues during our lives, me included. Thing is though, I (personally) would rather hurl myself over a cliff before I could ever put a gun or a law up to anothers head and demand they feed, cloth, and house me. For me, involuntary socialism is an immoral issue.
Originally posted by Divinorumus
Maybe we can think of a way to pay for a safety net without having to involuntarily enslave others. Suppose we add a social tax to ALL non-essential retail purchases? You want that $150 iPod? Fine, add a $300 social tax to your total. Now THAT is fair and voluntary and something I can morally sign off on. It voluntarily collects the most from those that can most afford it. And, it's moral!
Originally posted by NettleTea
I do not like socialism. The basic rundown of a socialist nation includes taking money from the individual in order to pay for programs that benefit the collective. This is theft of wealth. I work and earn my money. This is not your money, this is not the state's money, it is mine. To take my money away from me in order to pay for someone else's existence is wrong. If you disagree with that point, which is more philosophical, let me state this.
The taxes for these programs will be paid to the government. Nothing good has ever come from the unbridled expansion of government. The more wealth, and power to seize wealth, you give the state only works to undermine the freedom of individuals. If people want to install socialist programs then please do it at the State (as opposed to the Federal) level. That way when they pass a law in my State to pay 1/3 of my income to social programs, I can promptly move away.
Originally posted by operation mindcrime
Let me try to explain this ONE more time......
Socialisme meaning -> all income goes to the goverment and they decide what to do with it.
social democracy -> you give 30% of your income to help your fellow countrymen.
You people have a really hard time giving up a part of your money in order to help your neighbor don't you...??
Mine, mine,mine....maybe that's the reason your country is in the state that it is today...
Originally posted by operation mindcrime
You people have a really hard time giving up a part of your money in order to help your neighbor don't you...??
Originally posted by operation mindcrime
Nobody is asking but yet we CHOOSE to give...that's called being social...
...With 30% being held back on your pay check aren't the ones who make the most money already paying the most...
[edit on 18/11/2008 by operation mindcrime]
Originally posted by Frankidealist35
I think that this socialism label is just thrown around too much and it's been given a negative label by conservatives.
What's so bad about socialism?
Originally posted by NettleTea
Whether it is 20%, 30%, 50% or 100%, the stealing of wealth by the government is wrong. Call it socialism, social democracy, liberalism, or whatever you want. Any way you spin it the system works against the Constitution (at least at the blanket Federal level).
Another point, I don't know or care about my neighbor. Do I think he should pay for my living expenses? No. Do I think I should pay for his living expenses? No. This is called being an individual, and it is not exclusive to one nation. If you want to buddy up with everyone and share your income, then do it. That is the great thing about having a choice in a matter. A nanny state dissolves this choice. If you have no choices then you are not free.
Originally posted by Blaine91555
Is fair rewarding criminals, alcoholics, drug addicts and grown people still living in Mommy's basement with money and benefits taken involuntarily from those who work hard and succeed?