It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But the law was in fact to allow the buying of $700 billion of "troubled mortgages" and related assets.
Or was it?
See, buried in that bill was a nasty little catch-all "any other asset the Treasury says promotes financial stability."
One little sentence, with which you surrendered forever the principles of economic capitalism and replaced them with government totalitarianism.
Fascism.
And a week later half of that money was instead spent on a massive bailout of Wall Street through the injection of perpetual preferred stock, saving every single nickel of executive stock and options. No dilution of existing shareholders, nor any haircut for their bondholders, thereby preventing the capital structure of the firms from absorbing the losses as is intended and required under the law.
In other words, you, The Taxpayer, have been intentionally looted by the puppet-masters at Treasury (Hank Paulson) and The Fed (Bernanke, Geithner, et.al) to the tune of $250 billion dollars, while these folks in the so-called "private sector" keep each and every nickel of the money they stole from you while peddling their fraudulently-sold and packaged subprime and Option ARM mortgages.
America's House and Senate, just a couple of short weeks ago, passed a law that was denounced by The American People, where representatives and senators were receiving calls 50:50 against - 50% "No" and 50% "Hell No".
The bill passed after Henry Paulson and Ben Bernanke threatened Congress with the imposition of Martial Law. Yeah. Tanks in the streets stuff. Literally.
This was disclosed in the well of the house by a few brave representatives, including Representative Sherman.
Were you told this was how Congress was browbeaten into passing this law? Were you told that Congress was essentially threatened that tanks would be deployed into our cities and towns if Congress did not pass this bad law that Paulson and Bernanke demanded?
I bet, in fact, you cheered the nearly 1000 point rise in the DOW yesterday, even though it came from the expectation that you would be robbed blind to pay for the foibles of these bankers that arose from their felonious and outrageous conduct.
Sounds kinda Swedish.
Except its not, because the Swedes, when they had this same sort of problem with their banks, did two things you didn't:
Forced shareholders to take all loss before taxpayer money was used.
Forced full, complete balance sheet transparency.
The second is the critical item and the one that you and Bernanke have continually refused to address.
Yet this is the root of the problem with trust, when you get down to it.
Congress should let workers trade their 401(k) assets for guaranteed retirement accounts made up of government bonds, suggested Teresa Ghilarducci, an economics professor at The New School for Social Research in New York.
Maybe it will work, maybe it wont. I guess we will all see sometime in the near future. Probably months from now!
The preferred stock that each bank will have to issue will pay special dividends, at a 5 percent interest rate that will be increased to 9 percent after five years. The government will also receive warrants worth 15 percent of the face value of the preferred stock. For instance, if the government makes a $10 billion investment, then the government will receive $1.5 billion in warrants. If the stock goes up, taxpayers will share the benefits. If the stock goes down, the warrants will be worthless.
Originally posted by Lurkerzrule
Just wait till they start forcing your 401(k) money into US government bonds.
Tinfoil hat stuff? I am not so sure.
Congress should let workers trade their 401(k) assets for guaranteed retirement accounts made up of government bonds, suggested Teresa Ghilarducci, an economics professor at The New School for Social Research in New York.
Congress Mulls Major 401(k) Changes
Originally posted by Relentless
So what happened with our bailout money?
Originally posted by tide88
From what I understood the money was to be used for many different things, not just to buy troubled mortgage assests, but to do whatever necessary to prevent this mess from getting worse.
.... Also by them buying stock it also is highly likely three years from now they will be able to sell that stock at a much higher price.
The preferred stock that each bank will have to issue will pay special dividends, at a 5 percent interest rate that will be increased to 9 percent after five years. The government will also receive warrants worth 15 percent of the face value of the preferred stock. For instance, if the government makes a $10 billion investment, then the government will receive $1.5 billion in warrants. If the stock goes up, taxpayers will share the benefits. If the stock goes down, the warrants will be worthless.
Maybe it will work, maybe it wont. I guess we will all see sometime in the near future. ->Probably months from now
Herbert Hoover, October 1929
The fundamental business of the country, that is, production and distribution of commodities, is on a sound and prosperous basis.
Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon, early 1930
I see nothing in the present situation that is either menacing or warrants pessimism.
George Bush senior, December 1991
I remain convinced America's fundamentals are sound—not just the economic indicators that I mentioned a few moments ago, but the broad fundamentals that sustain American society.
Treasury Under-secretary John Taylor, October 2001
(O)ur basic fundamentals are very sound.
President Bush, The White House July 2007
...it's an economy that is large, flexible and resilient... And so I want the American people to take a good look at this economy of ours. The world is strong -- the world economy is strong. I happen to believe one of the main reasons why is because we remain strong. And my pledge to the American people is we will keep your taxes low to make sure the economy continues to remain strong, and we'll be wise about how we spend your money in Washington, D.C.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, The Greatest Economic Boom Ever: CNN Money July 2007
This is far and away the strongest global economy I've seen in my business lifetime
President Bush, The White House August 2007
When I came into office in 2001, our nation was headed into a recession. So we cut the taxes across the board. And hard working Americans have used this tax relief to produce strong and lasting economic growth... The American economy is the envy of the world... Now, what I focus on are the fundamentals of our economy... And the fundamentals of our economy are strong... Another factor one has got to look at is the amount of liquidity in the system... And I am told there is enough liquidity in the system to enable markets to correct.
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, April 2008
...monetary and fiscal policies are in train that should support a return to growth in the second half of this year and next year.
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, September 2008
...the American people can remain confident in the soundness and the resilience of our financial system.
John McCain, Washington Post, Washington Post September 2008
...the fundamentals of our economy are strong
Ron Paul, March 2007
Unless and until we get the Federal Reserve out of the business of creating money at will and setting interest rates, we will remain vulnerable to market bubbles and painful corrections.
Ron Paul, April 2007
The greatest threat facing America today is the disastrous fiscal policies of our own government, marked by shameless deficit spending and Federal Reserve currency devaluation.
Ron Paul, July 2007
The American empire is going to fail. It is in the process of failing. And I just want to get out of that empire building smoothly rather than waiting for a catastrophic event like a bankruptcy of this country.
I think we’re going to have a collapse before they come around to really thinking seriously about monetary policy and why we have to revamp it.
Originally posted by Rockpuck
In a 10 year span, had you invested in treasuries and bonds, you would most likely be ahead, percentage gain wise, with your original money then if you invested only in stocks.