It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by undo
reply to post by bruxfain
elaborare, please! sounds interesting.
kingship descending from heaven is not alien hybridization?
Originally posted by MatrixProphet
I also have the belief that Satan is the adversary of man not God, as I was taught when I was Christian. Also: that there is a conspiracy between the Gods involving us. This I find intriguing and thoughtful. It has led me to read many books that are delving into more abstract views regarding God and what I call his or their: Heavenly Congress.
The correlations between so many characters in the Bible (including Jesus) and mythology is fascinating! I think that it is very important, at least for me, to view information through skeptical eyes.
There is definitely a significance to all the apparent madness in any of the holy writings and archaeological truth and sound reasoning.
I may have a different perspective than many of you but I truly enjoy all the possibilities!!
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
reply to post by bruxfain
With all due repect, I dont see it impossible at all. I am not saying that Isaac should of received an Egyptian inheritence as a heir, I am just saying that if there was this Egyptian blood running through these famous men of the OT, then I would think the ones that knew of it were wanting to prove their might by their doings and actions.
Originally posted by undo
but wait... the seraphim were angels, yes?
the seraph were serpents, yes?
so some of the angels were serpent people, yes?
and they were sons of God. and they weren't bad.
so not all serpent seed is bad. only some is.
that's how i see it. maybe i'm wrong but only 1/3rd
of the angels fell! the other 2/3rds were still good guys.
Originally posted by undo
a paper by biblical scholar, michael s. heiser, entitled,
THE NACHASH AND HIS SEED.
Some Explanatory Notes on Why the Serpent in Genesis
3 Wasn't a Serpent (.pdf file)
www.thedivinecouncil.com...
^that's a very interesting paper.
Originally posted by undo
huh, i don't feel like a serpent.
enki was a male. that's an odd statement, brux.
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
reply to post by bruxfain
With all due repect, I dont see it impossible at all. I am not saying that Isaac should of received an Egyptian inheritence as a heir, I am just saying that if there was this Egyptian blood running through these famous men of the OT, then I would think the ones that knew of it were wanting to prove their might by their doings and actions.
.
Originally posted by bruxfain
Originally posted by LeoVirgo
reply to post by bruxfain
With all due repect, I dont see it impossible at all. I am not saying that Isaac should of received an Egyptian inheritence as a heir, I am just saying that if there was this Egyptian blood running through these famous men of the OT, then I would think the ones that knew of it were wanting to prove their might by their doings and actions.
If the answer to the question of the OP were affirmative, the inevitable consequence would be the destruction of the State of Israel.
The assertion that the modern nation State of Israel can exist is based on the notion that Isaac is Abraham's son and that the Modern State of Israel is the heir of Isaac; just as certain, the entire Islamic faith and the Ummah is based on the idea that Ishmael is Abraham's son. If I proved that Ishmael was not Abrahams son, the Temple Mount would cease to be under Muslim administration, Palestine would vanish and the Ummah would be plunged into Hell.
The belief that Isaac is not Abraham's son is a declaration of War against the State of Israel. Just like I declared war against the Ummah when I stated Ishmael is not Abraham's son, but the son of Eliezer of Damacus, Abraham's servant.
Can you not see this? Do you take these topics lightly?
By you saying that you do not see where it is impossible that Isaac was the offspring of Pharoah and Sarah means you are possibly in a state of war with Western Civilization because you consider it to be illegitimate and subject to the House of the Serpent as Isaac was the offspring of Pharoah by one of his concubines; Abraham's wife no less. Furthermore to that you assert that Abraham has no sons and his Kingly line died off; thus you summarily reject the exsistence of Jesus Christ and consider it possible that no such person existed. Consequently, by your own mouth you implicitly admit to be a servant of the Serpent and prove that the devil of the Christian bible is real.
The thing that many people don't seem to be able to grasp is the utter seriousness of government and the real source of power.
I won't assume that you don't know what you are doing, but instead I will assume that you know exactly what you are writing and joined this conspiracy website for the purpose of spreading disinformation.
I will say this. Isaac is Abraham's son and heir, Hagar is Pharoah's daughter and Ishmael is the son of Eliezer of Damascus.
[edit on 4-10-2008 by bruxfain]
[edit on 4-10-2008 by bruxfain]
[edit on 4-10-2008 by bruxfain]