It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
PARIS — The Federal Reserve, the European Central Bank and other central banks massively escalated the assistance offered to global money markets on Thursday, coordinating efforts to ease funding constraints stemming from the financial turmoil emanating from Wall Street.
The Fed said in a statement that it had authorized a $180 billion expansion of its temporary reciprocal currency arrangements, known as swap lines, to allow banks to borrow more dollars in markets at a lower rates.
“This is clearly a very significant help and central banks are showing decisive leadership here as risk aversion is hitting the private sector,” said Julian Callow, chief European economist at Barclays Capital in London.
The Fed also authorized increases in the existing swap lines with the European Central Bank, up to $110 billion from $55 billion, and the Swiss National Bank, up to $27 billion from $15 billion.
New swap facilities were established by the Fed with the Bank of Japan, for $60 billion; the Bank of England, for $40 billion; and the Bank of Canada for $10 billion.
“The central banks continue to work together closely and will take appropriate steps to address the ongoing pressures,’’ the ECB said in a statement.
Originally posted by Zepherian
Don't bother to drape it in political theory, just call it what it really is, theft and deception. First the deception of a Fiat currency, which sucks the very lifeblood out of an economy, and then the theft of banking consolidation of assets by calling in the credits, despite the fact that they were the very institutions than engineered the financial collapse.
Originally posted by infinite
reply to post by Areal51
No, that isn't what communism is about. This isn't redistribution of wealth based on the worker and all individuals being equal. Under a communist system capitalism and corporations would not exist. Nor is this "the third way" either.
This isn't a left vs right issue.
The only political-economic thought that could be applied here is the economic structure operated by Mussolini in Italy, which is arguably the most successful fiscal system Italy ever had.
As St Udio and I have said countless times on ATS: only two potential system can replace this current capitalism - a fascist style capitalism (Mussolini) or Islamic capitalism (no interest)
[edit on 18-9-2008 by infinite]
Originally posted by ThichHeaded
Sound almost like what happened at the beginning of the last American Depressions. eh?
Originally posted by grimreaper797
reply to post by Maxmars
No he is right. The government, to my knowledge, has not acted on the warrants that AIG has given them. That mean the government isn't running AIG and its not government "owned". So long as AIG meets their end to pay back the loan, which they DO have the ability to do, the taxpayer will make some money off this in interest.
AIG just needed time to raise capital that it wouldnt have had without a loan. I think that the private sector just wanted to see AIG engage in a fire sale, or go bankrupt so they could pick of the pieces for dirt cheap.
[edit on 18-9-2008 by grimreaper797]
Originally posted by infinite
reply to post by Areal51
No, that isn't what communism is about. This isn't redistribution of wealth based on the worker and all individuals being equal. Under a communist system capitalism and corporations would not exist. Nor is this "the third way" either.
This isn't a left vs right issue.
The only political-economic thought that could be applied here is the economic structure operated by Mussolini in Italy, which is arguably the most successful fiscal system Italy ever had.
As St Udio and I have said countless times on ATS: only two potential system can replace this current capitalism - a fascist style capitalism (Mussolini) or Islamic capitalism (no interest)
[edit on 18-9-2008 by infinite]
Originally posted by mybigunit
And in a true free market this should of happened. That is how things work. If you mismanage you lose the company isnt that why these CEOs get paid millions of dollars? There is no accountability anymore. You can walk in, take your millions, run the company to the ground, and still get paid. This is why America doesnt compete worldwide anymore.
Originally posted by grimreaper797
In a true free market you would be getting raped by monopolies. In a true free market, yesterday would have been the start of the next great depression. In a true free market, you wouldn't be able to afford to survive in the coming months.
And accountability is nice, so long as the entire market doesn't crumble as a result. If you want to push for another great depression, fine, but don't hide behind "the free market" to push your crazy armeggeddon desires.