It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jakyll
And,as you're taking this topic down the inevitable route,do you think its ok for pedophilia and beastiality sites to exist on line?
...just dont bitch when its you or your family getting dragged down the streets all charred and burnt...
I personally draw the line at animal abuse and violent attacks on people.
There is no reason to keep showing the video.
And,as you're taking this topic down the inevitable route,do you think its ok for pedophilia and beastiality sites to exist on line?
Such sites are available to anyone who uses the internet,including children.Sex,i have no problem with,but sites like the ones mentioned above and sites that cater to the more violent and abusive kind of porn should be banned.
The only information gleaned from such clips as the kangaroo video is this;some humans are sick and twisted.
And,as the vast majority of us already know this,we don't need such informative videos on line.
Originally posted by jakyll
Should sites such as YouTube be banned or forced into better policing of its content?
The reason i ask is because the clips showing abuse to animals and attacks on people that seem to be on the increase.
(as shown in the video of this thread,
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I find things so sickening that i can't even bring myself to watch them.
YouTube allows you to flag such clips but in their terms of agreement there are no rules that state such content is forbidden to be uploaded.
Copyright is usually the focus as it involves big businesses losing money,but isn't it about time something was done to stop this outrage??
(apologies if this is not in the right forum)
You must be losing your agument if you resort to that. Photos of pedophilia and beastiliality are a crime to posess.
And why should I or anyone else care where you personally draw the line? Who made you God? (Don't take offense, I'm not saying you really think you are god.)
So it's okay for kids to watch "regular" porn then?
I don't say this to be rude...But if you start expecting things to be banned as petty as that your asking for more to get banned. The government has taken away our liberties and manipulates the laws to their benefit...The internet is our last salvation from the government. WE DON'T WANT ANYMORE REGULATIONS AND RULES! So please, if you don't like it just don't watch it.
Is it too much to ask that sites such as youtube view videos before agreeing to them being uploaded?
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.
Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly resolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966.
Entry into force 23 March 1976, in accordance with Article 49.
....Article 18
1. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. This right shall include freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice, and freedom, either individually or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in worship, observance, practice and teaching.
2. No one shall be subject to coercion which would impair his freedom to have or to adopt a religion or belief of his choice.
3. Freedom to manifest one's religion or beliefs may be subject only to such limitations as are prescribed by law and are necessary to protect public safety, order, health, or morals or the fundamental rights and freedoms of others.
4. The States Parties to the present Covenant undertake to have respect for the liberty of parents and, when applicable, legal guardians to ensure the religious and moral education of their children in conformity with their own convictions.
Article 19
1. Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference.
2. Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.
3. The exercise of the rights provided for in paragraph 2 of this article carries with it special duties and responsibilities. It may therefore be subject to certain restrictions, but these shall only be such as are provided by law and are necessary:
(a) For respect of the rights or reputations of others;
(b) For the protection of national security or of public order (ordre public), or of public health or morals.
Originally posted by jakyll
reply to post by ROO-meh
and some sort of ebay type flagging ?
That never seems to work.
Some videos have been flagged up to a 100 times or more and they are still on line.
You asked where i would draw the line,i answered.If you don't want to know,don't bother to ask.
I just didn't make it clear that i don't have a problem with sex,but that doesn't mean i agree with children watching it.
Originally posted by jakyll
Should sites such as YouTube be banned or forced into better policing of its content?
The reason i ask is because the clips showing abuse to animals and attacks on people that seem to be on the increase.
(as shown in the video of this thread,
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I find things so sickening that i can't even bring myself to watch them.
Then why are you watching them? Something must have caused you to look at animal abuse videos on there. If they are so sickening, don't watch them.