It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


FAA Release of Radar Data Signals a new 'Openness Policy' on UFOs

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

+11 more 
posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 04:06 PM

100% proof via FAA Radar Data that a UFO travelling 2100mph entered the skies in Stephenville Texas

Significant support for the testimony of multiple witnesses of a UFO seen near Stephenville Texas on January 8, 2008 came in the form of radar data recently released by the Federal Aviation Authority (FAA). Responding to a series of Freedom of Information requests by the Mutual UFO Network (MUFON), the FAA supplied 2.8 million radar returns from five sites covering the area where the UFO was sighted
(visit the link for the full news article)


Changed title to mirror the one on the Op Ed article

Headline: Please use the original story headline from your source. If the headline is biased or otherwise inapporpriate, provide a descriptive headline that is accurate and reflects the article you're submitting. Submissions with inaccurate, biased or otherwise deceptive headlines may be removed.

[edit on 14/8/08 by masqua]

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 04:06 PM
At last some undeniable proof that an object travelling at 2100 mph entered our skies.
(visit the link for the full news article)

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 04:12 PM
This is awesome!!! Now the question is whether it was a super-top secret government project or a extraterrestrial craft. Both are pretty plausible, and I actually think that at this point the government would be more quiet about the first option.

I am so excited

[edit on 8/13/2008 by InterestedObserver]

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 04:15 PM
Nice find Frans. Found it interesting the MIB were sent in to jack that report down. Something amazing happened there. No doubt in my mind.

[edit on 8/13/2008 by jpm1602]

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 04:19 PM
Thanks for the update Fran. I think it very interesting how something that has a radar return can accelerate to 2100 mph and not create a sonic boom. This means more than likely they create some kind of field around the ship that allows it to become free of our gravity and also the friction experienced with conventional airplanes which causes the very loud boom.

Wonder if maybe they were heading over to Crawford to pick up the decider for a hoedown yeeeeeeehhhhhaaaaa.

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 04:21 PM
wow, thats heaps good that thats all be released. Good work Fran.

Now this post isnt a one liner

Yes it is... Mod Note: One Line Post – Please Review This Link.

[edit on 13-8-2008 by elevatedone]

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 04:22 PM
reply to post by TH3ON3

Could it be that the ufo can somehow bend air around the craft and therefore, doesn't create a sonic boom. Some form of electromagnetic distortion maybe? This is very interesting, especially due to the fact that the FAA have released this data I am seriously thinking along the lines of disclosure 2009

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 04:26 PM
star, flag, proof the Air Force is lyinggggggg

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 04:28 PM

Originally posted by ufo reality
star, flag, proof the Air Force is lyinggggggg

I wanted you to jump on this one uforeality now you can do what you usually do and thats take this to the top . Good work by the way!

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 04:37 PM
reply to post by franspeakfree

to answer your question on how they are able to go so fast and not cause a sonic boom is that the ship creates its own space/time. it uses 3 things made like a telsa coil made up of element 115 (i read this somewhere and i found it to be semi credible.) basically it can move objects with it, and warp into a different space/time. look up element 115. it has the ability to create its own gravitational field. the life forms (if there ARE life forms in these ufo's) in this craft are not effected when they do those impossible turns and accelerations. i might be wrong, but its the best info thats out there regarding how they do those crazy menuvers without crushing their bodies inside. correct me if im wrong... or give me your best theory, id love to hear it!

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 04:56 PM
okay, I'm not trying to find flaws or be the downer of this thread, but what are the chances this UFO was the Aurora? We, the public, have no certain evidence of what this monster of an aircraft has and what it's capable of? I'm not saying this could be another planetary visitor nor would i want to rule that possibility out, but let's think of other things that could be it rather than jumping to the UFO conclusion, shut down the other possibilities that could be used an excuse so all we are left with is a true UFO.

(PS: i checked the link but didn't see a video, is there a video over there via another link or something? All i saw were words.)

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 06:55 PM
With our current mainstream understanding. That should have broken every window in Stephensville from the sonic blast. It was sumptin' else Jed.

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 07:21 PM
A sonic-boom is an air-shock-wave. Basically if the craft can cut through the air without much friction or if it can negate the creation of the shock-wave in front of it - then you would not get a sonic boom. My thinking is that if it's some kind of ET technology, speed is one thing - they may be actually altering time in their locale - by altering time, our "speed" is not the same speed that they are using. 2100 mph? That is what we perceive - however, they may have gone 210 mph but altered time by 10x relative to us. Our clock is ticking but theirs may be changing.

Pretty good site:

[edit on 13-8-2008 by bonaire]

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 07:29 PM
reply to post by bonaire

Hm...I've wondered how UFOs break and sound barrier and no sonic boom is created. Good theory in my opinion bonaire and link too!

I wonder too, is it that difficult to not make a peep while achieving Mach 1 and over?? What kind of technology would it take to do that?

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 07:36 PM
nice find!

I would add that the conclusions as to why the military would allow this kind of data to be so easily released is worth the read itself. I was skeptical to where he was going with the article at first but he concluded well.

Although his three possible reasons why the policy would change were pretty well thought out it still boggles my mind as to why and what is exactly going on. That was also the first Ive heard of the this story talking about the UN meeting on ufo openness.

star and flag!

(maybe it wasnt a ufo but harold and kumar headed to the crawford ranch

[edit on 13-8-2008 by 911fnord]

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 07:47 PM
finally those poor people who were criticized by the media and made fools out of have some evidence to back up their clam. star and flagged

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 07:58 PM
Shouldn't the title of the thread be the same as the title of the article? Isn't that one of the rules?

Ignoring the possible rule-bending title, I will use the opportunity of reading this report to get more information about this case, I was too busy when it happened and I did not saw it at first, so I never had the time read about it.

Flagged, even with this title, it's important information.

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 08:14 PM
I just posted this thread today:
Weather Radar Picks Up Car Doing 130 MPH

Kind of similar, huh?

Maybe we should be looking at the doppler radar shots. Since we have access to it.

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 08:17 PM
If the craft in question was extra-terrestrial in origin, it might be safe to assume the existence of some sort of "anti-gravity" capability.

That being the case, it might be that the craft was able to avoid creating a sonic boom as it accelerated as a by-product of the localized gravitional distortion generated by the the ship itself.

Just guessing here but, if the air molecules in the immediate vicinity of the craft were affected by a low/no gravity field, would that not affect how they respond to the physics of pressure wave generation which results in a sonic boom?

If a given quantity of air has no mass (as a result of exposure to gravity-nullification) could that quantity of air sustain a "pressure wave", that is to say, propagate the conditions necessary for a sonic boom?

On a more terrestrial (but likely less effective) scale, another way to mitigate the conditions that would result in a sonic boom would be to micro-control the laminar flow of the air stream as it passes ove (and under) the craft.

This might be accomplished by incorporating micro-electronic mechanical (MEM) devices on the surface of the the craft's "skin".

Think of how the "flufffy" feathyers of an owl distrupt the sound waves generated by its wings, allowing the owl almost "silent flight".

posted on Aug, 13 2008 @ 09:06 PM
During this entire episode of over an hour, there is no indication that any of the military jets reacted to this unknown aircraft, that was without a required transponder, and that was headed directly to the Western White House

Would it be possible that the jets weren't pursuing the object, but escorting it so-to-speak?

If the US Air Force is testing skunk works crafts, I'd imagine these wouldn't be up alone.

Of course, if that were the case I fail to see why Area51 wouldn't be used..

Hasn't anyone come out with some pix of the Stephenville event yet?

new topics

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in