The North Side Flyover - Officially Documented, Independently Confirmed

Originally posted by discombobulator
When you grow up and start acting like the adult you apparently are you will realise that this is a direct contradiction to Craig's claim that the "flyover" plane would have been indistinguishable from normal, everyday traffic!

WHEN YOU GROW UP AND LEARN HOW TO READ YOU MIGHT UNDERSDTAND THAT THE C-130 COMING FROM AN ODD DIRECTION CONTRIDICTS THE 84th RADES DATA OF THE C-130 BEING ON NORMAL COURSE.



[edit on 6-9-2008 by ULTIMA1]

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by discombobulator
When you grow up and start acting like the adult you apparently are you will realise that this is a direct contradiction to Craig's claim that the "flyover" plane would have been indistinguishable from normal, everyday traffic!

WHEN YOU GROW UP AND LEARN HOW TO READ YOU MIGHT UNDERSDTAND THAT THE C-130 COMING FROM AN ODD DIRECTION CONTRIDICTS THE 84th RADES DATA OF THE C-130 BEING ON NORMAL COURSE.

LOL!

The more worked up you are, the more childish and immature you get!

The 84 RADES data and the transcripts show that the C-130 was requested to divert from it's normal course and follow the "unknown aircraft".

Please engage your brain and address the evidence like an ADULT before responding to me again with your nonsense. You are making yourself appear stupider and stupider with every post!



[edit on 6-9-2008 by discombobulator]

Ultima1,

You no longer have any credibility whatsoever to discuss this issue. You are actually harming Craig's work by continuing to post your immature nonsense that has me wondering if you really are an adult at all.

I suggest you take your circular arguments and deliberate obfuscations to another thread where, hopefully for you, your idiocy isn't so transparent.

Originally posted by discombobulator
You no longer have any credibility whatsoever to discuss this issue.

Well you never had any credablility to discuss any issue.

Please show me in the transcript you posted anything about being diverted off course, or please be adult enouh to admit you are wrong.







[edit on 6-9-2008 by ULTIMA1]

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by discombobulator
You no longer have any credibility whatsoever to discuss this issue.

Well you never had any credablility to discuss any issue.

Coming from you that means absolutely nothing.

Please refrain from being so immature. Grow up and act like the adult you allegedly are.

Originally posted by discombobulator
Please refrain from being so immature. Grow up and act like the adult you allegedly are.

Please show me in the transcript you posted anything about being diverted off course, or please be adult enouh to admit you are wrong.



[edit on 6-9-2008 by ULTIMA1]

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by discombobulator
You no longer have any credibility whatsoever to discuss this issue.

Please show me in the transcript you posted anything about going off course, or please be aadult enouh to admit you are wwrong.

How stupid is this going to get?

13:37:09 GOFER06 instructed to turn right and follow the aircraft

Do you think that was in his flight plan before take off?

Please refrain from being so immature. Grow up and act like the adult you allegedly are.

Originally posted by discombobulator
13:37:09 GOFER06 instructed to turn right and follow the aircraft

So that would mean that he was on course with the aircraft he was following, not an odd direction as the witness states.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by discombobulator
You no longer have any credibility whatsoever to discuss this issue.

Well you never had any credablility to discuss any issue.

Please show me in the transcript you posted anything about being diverted off course, or please be adult enouh to admit you are wrong.







[edit on 6-9-2008 by ULTIMA1]

Gofer06 instructed to turn right and follow the aircraft
gofer06 instructed to right heading 80 degrees
gofer06 instucted to maintain 2000

Is that enough. It is obvious that has diverted and that is why it is coming from an odd direction. Especially since this adds up with the RADES data. Man trying to explain something to you is like talking to a 3 year old. It is impossible, this is way over you head. Please stop posting. Actually keep posting it shows how craigs theories dont hold up. Even a twoofer doesnt believe it. Or wait, he believes it but posts info that contradicts what he is saying. I love it. Ultima you are priceless.

Originally posted by tide88
Gofer06 instructed to turn right and follow the aircraft
gofer06 instructed to right heading 80 degrees
gofer06 instucted to maintain 2000

Is that enough. It is obvious that has diverted and that is why it is coming from an odd direction.

But doesn't that mean the C-130 would have been following the plane not coming from an odd direction as the witness states?

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by discombobulator
13:37:09 GOFER06 instructed to turn right and follow the aircraft

So that would mean that he was on course with the aircraft he was following, not an odd direction as the witness states.

Are you seriously an NSA analyst?

I mean, seriously?

COUGH,,.clears voice,

PLAY NICE NOW.

Originally posted by discombobulator

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by discombobulator
13:37:09 GOFER06 instructed to turn right and follow the aircraft

So that would mean that he was on course with the aircraft he was following, not an odd direction as the witness states.

Are you seriously an NSA analyst?

I mean, seriously?

Yes he analyzes the dirty floors before he mops them, the toilets before he cleans them, and the gabage cans before he empties them. Sorry mod didnt see your post above. Couldnt resist.

[edit on 6-9-2008 by tide88]

Originally posted by discombobulator
Are you seriously an NSA analyst?

I mean, seriously?

Yes i am as i have proven to several members.



[edit on 6-9-2008 by ULTIMA1]

Originally posted by sanctum
COUGH,,.clears voice,

PLAY NICE NOW.

Play nice?

Why don't you actually read what is going on here.

Do you really think Ultima1 is engaging in respectful debate?

Originally posted by tide88
Yes he analyzes the dirty floors before he mops them, the toilets before he cleans them, and the gabage cans before he empties them. Sorry mod didnt see your post above. Couldnt resist.

[edit on 6-9-2008 by tide88]

Don't make me call the mods again.

Originally posted by discombobulator
Do you really think Ultima1 is engaging in respectful debate?

Yes i am trying to have an adult discussion.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Originally posted by discombobulator
Do you really think Ultima1 is engaging in respectful debate?

Yes i am trying to have an adult discussion.

Trying, but not succeeding.

Your efforts here are infantile at best.

Any sensible person can look over the last two pages of this thread and realise that your argument has a foundation in, well, manure.

There is nothing left to discuss.

Originally posted by discombobulator
Trying, but not succeeding.

Well its hard to have a discussion with people who want to either insult, ignore facts and evidence or twist posts.

Originally posted by ULTIMA1

Well its hard to have a discussion with people who want to either insult, ignore facts and evidence or twist posts.

Which is exactly why I am putting you on my ignore list.

Thankyou and goodbye.