It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by burdman30ott6
Is reading comprehension part of that IQ test?
Originally posted by burdman30ott6Are you sure you didn't mean to say you administer educational apptitude tests? Those might show this supposed 50th percentile and lower score which I now believe is a complete figment of your imagination anyway.
Originally posted by Lilitu
Reading comprehension? It has already been pointed out by SaviorComplex that "most school clubs for high-achievers or gifted students have volunteerism requirements". The same principles hold. We cannot expect something for nothing. Of course it is a whole lot easier to sit at home ranting about this conspiracy theory or that while bemoaning our powerlessness.
Originally posted by LilituAs a clinical psychologist I think I know what tests I administer thank you. For some oddball reason many of the home schooling parents in this area like to think their home schooled children are Mensa material, and so they come to me to test their children prior to the Mensa exam. They are as incredulous as you after learning what meatheads their children really are. Like father/mother, like son/daughter.
Originally posted by ALightinDarkness
Your propagandizing is nice and I am sure the Obama campaign would be proud, but speaking from Obama's daily talking points once he realized this wouldn't be a good idea really doesn't convince me of anything. However, as I said, as long as its completely optional I don't care. I know reading beyond the talking points is a lot of work for people on ATS.
Spoken like someone who has truly never spent lots of time doing community service. I suggest you look into the research done by lots of sociology scholars about linking material incentives to do service. It doesn't end up well. The problem is that if you are paying people to do community service then they aren't doing community service, they are in it for the money. People can and do game the system, because (surprise) a few programs like this already exist. They don't last long, nor do they go national, because they are failures.
Originally posted by SaviorComplex
People of Goldberg's political leaning, including people here on ATS, will often complain that we are giving handouts to people for the virtue of the fact all they are doing is breathing. Now when presented with a plan that will ask people to do something in exchange for the money being handed-out ("If you want this money, you will have to work for it) they are unhappy. Goldberg and people like him want it both ways.
[edit on 9-7-2008 by SaviorComplex]
I think you are missing the point. Obama's policy is not forced servitude, In a nutshell all it is saying is that if you want a college education and need government assistance then there is no free ride. Do not expect something for nothing. Requiring students to earn that assistance is a good thing and will teach them valuable skills they could not learn any other way.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
Of course Republican talking points are always the God's honest truth, right?
Yeah, they're failures, all except the US Military. How many tens of thousands sign up for service just to get college money?
Before 9/11 of course; nowadays anyone with the brains to get into college shouldn't be stupid enough to join the military unless they have strong suicidal tendencies and/or enjoy the effects of PTSD. And no, that's NOT a commentary on the troops, but on the elitist corporatocracy that sends them to fight and die for the profits of a handful of dirty old men.
And as for Obama wanting to tie this to federal funding for school districts, Hooray for him. It proves once again he is no Socialist. Were he, or were he even a real Liberal, he would completely do away with people having to pay out-of-pocket for higher education and set up a new system where college through at least the Bachelor's Degree level was free to all who qualify--just like it is in most of the civilized world. Oh but that's bad too, isn't it? Unconstitutional, right? Why don't you whine some more about the unconstitutionality of government-provided services on the taxpayer-funded Internet while kissing the butts of the neo-cons who actually HAVE wiped their butts with the Bill of Rights.
Again, its obvious most people on ATS have never spent much time on community service.
Originally posted by ALightinDarkness
They would not be, if I were a Republican. See, that is what you get for thinking that everyone who disagrees with the DNC is a republican. You'll find lots of people do - including me, a Libertarian. I disagree with the RNC too, but on ATS most of the propaganda is straight from DNC propagandist operatives. If you kindly point me to a RNC propagandist, I'll gladly point them out too.
Yeah, they're failures, all except the US Military. How many tens of thousands sign up for service just to get college money?
Umm..what? What in the world does this have to do with forced community service? As anyone can go to a respectable college for free if you put in the effort to make good grades, no one should be joining the military for college money.
Your DNC propaganda talking points are not relevant to the topic. Please propagandize elsewhere.
For once, think past your narrow worldview and your need to turn everything into a political circus. This is NOT POLITICAL. This is FORCING PEOPLE TO DO SOMETHING THEY DO NOT WANT TO DO, AND IT WILL HARM THOSE OF US WHO DO COMMUNITY SERVICE. Take your partisan politics out of it.
Again, its obvious most people on ATS have never spent much time on community service. I have. Those of us who care about doing good in our communities because its the right thing to do realize this sort of thing is beyond the partisan garbage posted in this thread. Facts are facts: forcing people to do community service means they are no longer doing it because they want to, and it means they force those of us who enjoy doing community service into a babysitting role. It will harm our communities where community service is a big part of the social infrastructure. See past your own partisan propaganda.
Originally posted by Maxmars
Again, its obvious most people on ATS have never spent much time on community service.
While your perception may be true of most people YOU have had experiences with on ATS, please avoid the generalization which lumps us all together. I'm sure I need not elaborate on why, or in what way this is a faulty generalization.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
Ah, a Libertarian (code for Anarchist). Interesting you claim DNC "operatives" rule ATS. A little paranoia mixed in with your 18th Century fantasies?
You made the claim that requiring someone to do community service in order to get federal funding for college hurts charities. It has been pointed out, numerous times, that this program would be voluntary for students, just as joining the military for college money is also voluntary.
It has been pointed out to you that the source for this is highly biased, Obama did NOT say it would be mandatory for all students, and that this notion of "forced servitude" is complete hysteria. Acknowledge these facts, and take your own advice.
Have you even considered that, even if what you're saying about this being forced on people were true (it's NOT), that it would not be packaged in such a way? That those students who might be asked to do this would first have the importance of such work instilled in them at an early age, so they DO want it?
Originally posted by Maxmars
Presumptively your assertion is that of the 141,310 members on ATS at least 70,656 have never performed community service. And you know this how, have you asked all of us?
Originally posted by Maxmars
Sorry. It is a generalization, and it IS faulty - unless you know of an ATS poll that I was unaware of (and therefore never participated in - rendering it faulty anyway).
Originally posted by Maxmars
(Sorry to be technically anal about this, but you wouldn't just accept the polite suggestion without a rebuttal.)
Originally posted by ALightinDarkness
This is why higher education is important. Then you'd know the difference between libertarian and anarchist.
As for the second line, your fellow DNC operatives would not be proud, your stepping over the protocol for how your supposed to respond when someone points out your a propagandist. As a reminder, your supposed to deflect and obfuscate - insulting me just makes it more obvious what your up to.
Wrong. Most people don't join the military for the college money as there are easier ways to get it.
However, tying forced community service into aid WOULD force people into community service.
You are of course ignoring the multiple failures that already exist when people have attempted to tie sums of money into community service. It results in people exploiting the system and hurts the effectiveness of those in it for the right reason. This would cause failure on a massive scale.
Just because your too stepped in your propaganda to seperate yourself from politics doesn't mean no one else can.
Politics is irrelevant to me when it comes to community service, and its obvious you have done little or no service or else you'd know this. It wouldn't matter to me if Bob Barr was for this, its still wrong.
Spoken from someone who has obviously never had to work with those forced into doing "community service." People do not suddenly love working for their community because they are forced to do it. In fact, it almost always makes them hate it. So if your goal is to turn future generations away from helping their community, GO FOR IT!
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
Having been a Libertarian for some time myself, attended meetings, etc. I can safely say that Libertarian philosophy is a direct road to anarchy. "Government so small you can drown it in a bathtub", to quote John Brown, can lead to nothing else. Nothing else that's any good for the rest of society, at least.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
And again, I'm no DNC propagandist. That you keep accusing me of such justifies any percieved insult you think I've hurled at you. You've already completely marginalized everything I have to say within your own mind, because in your paranoid state you have assumed everyone who disagrees with you must be a political operative from the opposition.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
Bull#. Before 9/11 I'd say a majority of soldiers did, in fact, join for the college money, especially in the Reserves and National Guard. Since the Iraq quagmire numbers have dwindled greatly, to a point where most recruiting offices are struggling to meet quotas. If, as your denial of money as a motivation suggests, it were purely a patriotic issue, there would be no shortage of recruits, and the amounts of money for college and $20K "signing bonuses" would be completely unnecessary--yet they exist. I would go so far as to say if no GI Bill had ever been passed, our military would have to be almost 70% draftees to reach current numbers. The number who join purely out of patriotism or to make the military a career is definitely a minority.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
They have a choice to take the aid or not. Isn't that the justification given for the existence of other forms of servitude, such as debt? If you don't want to serve you don't have to. Get the money elsewhere. Which is why I say college should be free anyway, and eliminate the whole problem.
You keep mentioning these "multiple failures". Could you please elaborate?
And it's still voluntary. Christ, it hasn't even happened and you're acting like Obama wants to put kids on a chain gang! Man, you're whack.
Originally posted by ALightinDarkness
Right. You go from being a libertarian to a socialist. Yeah, I believe that one. As long as were making stuff up, I went from being a communist to a libertarian.
I again recommend you look at your propaganda guide. You need to work more on your deflecting and projecting.
Facts are facts.
There is no reason to join the military just for college, because you can get college full rides without nearly as much effort. If people are too dense to figure that out, I really feel little sympathy. You can get a full ride at any innumerable amount of respected state universities with little effort on your part beyond having good grades.
Making up facts based on DNC propaganda isn't reality.
Do you not understand the concept of externalities? There is a difference between this and taking on debt, since the externalities of taking on debt can be confined. However, yet again - when you FORCE PEOPLE to do community service it creates huge negative externalities both in their communities and on those of us who do it without being forced.
A number of state programs, and others like Americorps, are graveyards to quite a few "community service for cash" failures. The problem, as I have stated, is that people do it just for the cash and not for the greater good - and as such, they usually hamper community service efforts because they don't care about helping.
Again, spoken from someone who has never done much community service. Look up negative externalities, and think about it. I realize everything is about politics to you, and you feel a need to support the DNC propaganda, but this isn't about politics for me. It doesn't matter who supports it, or doesn't support it. Its a bad idea.
Originally posted by The Nighthawk
I was a Libertarian back in the mid '90s. The platform back then included such craziness as an open border with Mexico (look it up!!).
If what you say is true more than 20% of Americans would have a Bachelor's or higher education. Since they do not, I'd have to surmise you're just blowing smoke.
Do you not understand the concept of comprehending what the candidate actually said? Nobody is being forced to do this.
Originally posted by burdman30ott6
Fair enough, but why did you tie it to college assistance instead of education as a whole beforehand?
Originally posted by burdman30ott6I was homeschooled for part of my grade school years.