It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Comsence2075
I understsand your reasoning 100%. But the qoute says, ""If someone is about to launch a weapon that would devastate America."
If someone is really about to launch a weapon, I would hope we do something to prevent it. Iraq was not even close to being about to launch anything.
Originally posted by Parabol
I have a problem with it because that's exactly what they said about Iraq. They had WMD's and were a threat to America because of their ties to Al Qaeda. Both of which were admitted to being false. The idea of pre-emptive war is for dictators and despots. People are building arms and tension against us because of our actions. If we weren't so concerned with snuffing out anything that disagrees with us maybe certain people wouldn't have a reason to hate us.
Originally posted by ShadowEyes
Say we were both standing on the street and you raised your hand, but I some how got the idea you were 'about' to hit me, so I hit you first...pre-emptively. However, all you had intended to do was scratch your head.
One cannot strike out because of what one thinks is about to happen. You need much more solid of a reason to act against another then that.
It's the same thing if considering attacking a country because you think something is 'about' to happen.
That's simply not good enough.
Originally posted by SoundFX
I think the problem lies in the way we were fear mongered into Iraq with the WMD's, Al Qaeda in Iraq, etc, etc. Then there is no accountability for the lies, and false intel we were given.
So how are we to trust McCain where anytime something comes up we just play the WMD card and invade some random country and then give no proof of said WMD's?
Originally posted by centurion1211
So, to you perhaps millions of people (nuclear attack as an example) would have to die before you could say I guess they mean us harm - even if all the prior signs pointed to the attack? There must be millions of real examples of what can happen in the history of the world to counter your grossly simplistic head scratching scenario.
Well it is going to be tough for you to swallow when he wins...and he will win.
Originally posted by Comsence2075
"If someone is about to launch a weapon that would devastate America, or have the capability to do so, obviously, you would have to act immediately in defense of this nation's national security interests."
Originally posted by ViewFromTheStars
Well it is going to be tough for you to swallow when he wins...and he will win.
What an arrogant statement but amusing nonetheless, and for reasons that would not flatter the person who stated it.
This whole pre-emptive doctrine is luciferian and 99.9% of the people who go along with it and peddle it have no idea that it is and how dangerous it is. If mutual assured destruction will not keep WMD from being used, then NOTHING will. Many luminaries from the past understand this. As horrible as Hiroshima and Nagasaki were, a VERY important precedent was set and has kept things in check well. But going into territory I feel most of you will not be able to discern, this is also a -spiritual- battle that can't be won by conventional means. You can NOT defeat a supernatural enemy with natural force. To attempt to do so is nothing but a path of judgement.
Go ahead and vote pre-emptive doctrine. You are voting your own destruction.
[edit on 10-4-2008 by ViewFromTheStars]
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Comsence2075
"If someone is about to launch a weapon that would devastate America, or have the capability to do so, obviously, you would have to act immediately in defense of this nation's national security interests."
I have no problem with this.
I DO have a problem with any potential POTUS who says that he/she wouldn't launch a pre-emptive strike in order to safeguard us.
[edit on 4/10/2008 by FlyersFan]
Originally posted by Comsence2075
Good to see there are sane Americans left in the world that don't think all republicans are part of a secret satan group to destroy makind.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by Comsence2075
Good to see there are sane Americans left in the world that don't think all republicans are part of a secret satan group to destroy makind.
You haven't been here long ... I'm not a left-winger.
And Comsence .. it's the DEMS that are the secret satanic group that wants to destroy mankind .. well .. America anyways.