It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
"I don't think you could make a blanket statement about pre-emptive war, because obviously, it depends on the threat that the United States of America faces," McCain told his audience at Bridgewater Associates Inc., a global investment firm.
"If someone is about to launch a weapon that would devastate America, or have the capability to do so, obviously, you would have to act immediately in defense of this nation's national security interests."
McCain said he would consult more closely and more carefully "not with every member of Congress, but certainly the leaders of Congress."
Originally posted by SoundFX
reply to post by Comsence2075
I think the problem lies in the way we were fear mongered into Iraq with the WMD's, Al Qaeda in Iraq, etc, etc. Then there is no accountability for the lies, and false intel we were given.
So how are we to trust McCain where anytime something comes up we just play the WMD card and invade some random country and then give no proof of said WMD's?
Originally posted by Parabol
I have a problem with it because that's exactly what they said about Iraq. They had WMD's and were a threat to America because of their ties to Al Qaeda. Both of which were admitted to being false. The idea of pre-emptive war is for dictators and despots. People are building arms and tension against us because of our actions. If we weren't so concerned with snuffing out anything that disagrees with us maybe certain people wouldn't have a reason to hate us.
"If someone is about to launch a weapon that would devastate America, or have the capability to do so, obviously, you would have to act immediately in defense of this nation's national security interests."
" or have the capability to do so"
Originally posted by nowplanb
Well, I think you're gonna find out. Here's how it will happen. Obama will win the democratic nomination. The assassination will be successful. It's planned for Saturday September 13th, I think. About 4:56 pm central standard time. That will be the optimal moment to throw the democrats into mass confusion, and with Hillary off her game by this time will easily be beaten by McCain. He'll choose Romney for his running mate. I'm guessing he'll be heading for Iran on chinese credit. Anyway, he figures to die on July 2, 2011, whereupon Mitt Romney will become president.
Originally posted by Breifne
Is is just me, or does no other country on this planet have national security interests? Does no other country feel that they would be hit by an American ICBM? 'The Ruskies have them so we must' attitude rules!
Why do so many people hate America? The McCain comment should answer it diplomatically!!
If anyone votes McCain from this website - into my thread of hate you will go. Its not a nice place to be - full of wrongly spelt words and trash can answers etc.
Yours sincerely - Brei
Originally posted by Breifne
Comsence2075
I like your enthusiasm, but you clearly do not understand sarcasm.
''Into my thread of hate where all the wrongly spelt words etc go''. I thought that was a good joke - but then again it is near 4am here in Ireland.
Hmm. Sometimes I wonder about you.
I take you like American troops being in Iraq / going into Iran / Syria etc etc? 4000 / 5000 / 6000; stop me when this figure gets too high for you
Comsence2075!!
Then McCain is your man for further misery and further debts for YOUR country. Approximately 100 years of mysery according to McCain. By the way - this is the guy that said, ''I know where Osama Bin Laden is, and I will find him'' - then tell the current administration you complete and utter tool!!! Arrragghhh - that anoys me the most - I know where - bull#, you know nothing otherwise your party would have found him. Its people like you C that really crack me up.
Not my problem? - If it were up to me I would vote for Ron Paul! He at least appears to have his diplomatic head on.
Brei.